ROCKLAND COMMUNITY COLLEGE - Suffern, NY, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | TSE Maxwell | - | - | - | 1% | 11% | 39% | 49% |
2 | O'LONGAIGH Sunkhar | - | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 32% | 10% |
3 | NORMILE Nicholas | - | - | 2% | 13% | 34% | 39% | 11% |
3 | FENG Shang | - | - | - | 3% | 19% | 50% | 27% |
5 | NAKAS Levent | - | - | - | - | 5% | 30% | 64% |
6 | XIA Dashan | - | - | - | 1% | 11% | 44% | 44% |
7 | DYCKMAN Benjamin | 1% | 5% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 9% | 1% |
8 | KIM Henry | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 36% | 27% | 7% |
9 | SINGLETON Aman | - | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 42% | 29% |
10 | SOLARZ Arthur | - | 6% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 7% | < 1% |
11 | CHEN Jayden | - | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 38% | 18% |
12 | LI Jade | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 31% | 11% | 1% |
13 | HELMY Richard | - | - | 3% | 16% | 39% | 35% | 7% |
14 | CHEN Daniel | - | 2% | 13% | 31% | 35% | 16% | 3% |
15 | NOOL Alexander | 1% | 12% | 34% | 35% | 15% | 3% | - |
16 | AHMED Mohsen | 4% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 11% | 2% | - |
17 | LUO Alexander | - | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 36% | 13% |
18 | SONG Aidan | - | 3% | 15% | 32% | 34% | 15% | 2% |
19 | BHANDARE Veer | 2% | 11% | 30% | 36% | 18% | 3% | - |
20 | LI Ryan | 5% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - |
21 | TESFAYE Elias | - | 6% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 7% | 1% |
22 | GIORDANO Zach | 2% | 12% | 30% | 35% | 18% | 4% | - |
23 | WANG-SONG Evan | - | 4% | 19% | 35% | 30% | 10% | 1% |
24 | FOGEL Jake | 19% | 39% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
25 | BEYER Timothy | 1% | 7% | 23% | 35% | 25% | 9% | 1% |
26 | LIU Jeremy | 3% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 3% | - |
27 | CHEN Tianjun | 2% | 15% | 34% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - |
28 | YU David | 18% | 39% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
29 | VALLINA Finn | 19% | 39% | 30% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
30 | SHAPIRO Samuel | 3% | 16% | 34% | 32% | 13% | 2% | - |
31 | WANG Marcus | 46% | 40% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
32 | NOOL Aaron | 8% | 29% | 37% | 21% | 5% | - | - |
33 | GUMEDELLI Mohnish | - | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 40% | 17% |
34 | CODER Ethan | - | 2% | 16% | 37% | 33% | 11% | 1% |
35 | LEE Nicholas | 11% | 40% | 34% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
36 | WHITE Jackson | 6% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 9% | 1% | - |
37 | TANG Maximus | 6% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
38 | MCGANN Grant | 5% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - |
39 | MADRIGAL SALVAT Guillermo | 1% | 10% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 4% | - |
40 | NG Nico | 22% | 42% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
41 | CHEN Edward | 23% | 40% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
42 | ZHANG Shuhao | 64% | 30% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.