ROCKLAND COMMUNITY COLLEGE - Suffern, NY, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | CHEN Renee | - | - | - | - | 2% | 20% | 78% |
| 2 | CHO Emily (Euran) | - | - | - | 4% | 29% | 67% | |
| 3 | ZELDIN Nadia | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 41% | 18% | |
| 3 | PAULUS Sloane E. | - | - | - | 3% | 27% | 69% | |
| 5 | LI Eleanor | - | - | 2% | 16% | 43% | 39% | |
| 6 | KAPRAN Anastasia | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 43% | 22% | |
| 7 | LI Han (Helina) | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 43% | 25% | |
| 8 | WANG Amabel | - | - | 1% | 8% | 40% | 51% | |
| 9 | GREENLEAF Ella | - | - | 4% | 24% | 51% | 20% | |
| 10 | WANG Joanna | - | 1% | 10% | 34% | 41% | 13% | |
| 11 | HARRIS Julia | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 43% | 22% | |
| 12 | CHEN Sophie | 2% | 14% | 36% | 35% | 12% | 1% | |
| 13 | BERGEL Daphne | - | 4% | 20% | 40% | 32% | 5% | |
| 14 | CAVANAGH Emma | 2% | 16% | 38% | 34% | 9% | 1% | |
| 15 | CAI Ilana | 3% | 19% | 38% | 30% | 9% | 1% | |
| 16 | ROZPEDOWSKI Claire | - | 1% | 11% | 38% | 42% | 8% | |
| 17 | SHERLOCK Gabriella | 2% | 14% | 33% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 18 | REZA Fukaina | 1% | 11% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 19 | LIN Yunong | 1% | 10% | 30% | 37% | 18% | 3% | |
| 20 | HUANG Sophie | 3% | 19% | 42% | 29% | 7% | - | |
| 21 | MCFARLANE Asha | 1% | 14% | 39% | 34% | 11% | 1% | |
| 22 | LI Savannah | 12% | 38% | 35% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 23 | HUSSIAN Annabelle | 4% | 21% | 38% | 28% | 8% | 1% | |
| 24 | LIU Caydence | - | 6% | 29% | 45% | 18% | 1% | |
| 25 | LI Xiang (Shining) | 10% | 33% | 38% | 17% | 2% | - | |
| 26 | BING Charlotte | - | 4% | 24% | 42% | 25% | 5% | |
| 27 | LEE Allison | 37% | 45% | 16% | 2% | - | - | |
| 28 | DIMATULAC Elise Ann | - | 5% | 19% | 35% | 30% | 10% | 1% |
| 29 | ORRINGER Lottie | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 40% | 27% | 3% |
| 30 | LI Yixin Catherine | 22% | 41% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 31 | ZAMLYNNY Maya | 1% | 11% | 31% | 37% | 17% | 3% | |
| 32 | CARON Josie | 13% | 36% | 34% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 33 | KIM Claire | 3% | 17% | 38% | 32% | 9% | 1% | |
| 34 | JANSSEN Juliane | 18% | 40% | 31% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 35 | SHANG Arianna | 20% | 42% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 36 | ZHANG Zoey | 25% | 42% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 37 | HAND Sadie | 45% | 42% | 11% | 1% | - | - | |
| 38 | BAULIN Zoya | 16% | 40% | 33% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 39 | TSE Isabel | 21% | 49% | 25% | 5% | - | - | |
| 40 | JIN Amie | 16% | 39% | 32% | 11% | 2% | - | |
| 41 | JIN Sophie | 34% | 43% | 19% | 4% | - | - | |
| 42 | WANG Selina | 24% | 49% | 23% | 4% | - | - | |
| 42 | MOON Eleni | 24% | 43% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.