Northwest Fencing Center - Tigard, OR, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | SHAN Junzhe | - | - | - | - | 1% | 17% | 81% |
2 | LU Jacob | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 37% | 51% |
3 | DODDAPANENI Aarav | - | - | 2% | 10% | 31% | 41% | 17% |
3 | TAI Edison | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 36% | 55% |
5 | ZHAO Michael(Junyi) | - | 1% | 13% | 40% | 37% | 8% | |
6 | WANG aaron | - | 3% | 17% | 37% | 33% | 10% | |
7 | TANG Zheng | - | 2% | 10% | 26% | 36% | 22% | 4% |
8 | KROPP Wesley | 2% | 12% | 32% | 37% | 16% | 1% | |
9 | VAN JAARSVELD Leo | 1% | 10% | 28% | 36% | 20% | 5% | - |
10 | MAZAHERI Fletcher | - | 1% | 11% | 33% | 39% | 16% | |
11 | ZHOU Shawn | - | 1% | 8% | 30% | 42% | 19% | |
12 | WU Matthew | 17% | 42% | 31% | 9% | 1% | - | |
13 | LEE Daniel | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 32% | 12% | 1% |
14 | YAO Tristan | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 40% | 21% | 1% |
15 | KIM Remington | 1% | 10% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 6% | - |
16 | WANG Devin | 1% | 11% | 34% | 36% | 16% | 3% | |
17 | DONG Haiyi | - | - | - | 4% | 19% | 44% | 33% |
18 | NAIR Sujit | 1% | 5% | 20% | 35% | 30% | 10% | |
19 | HSU Joshua | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 38% | 28% | 5% |
20 | LIU Zicheng | 17% | 37% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
21 | SRINIVASAN Sanat Ram | 6% | 26% | 38% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
22 | GOWDA Suyog | - | 2% | 13% | 34% | 37% | 14% | |
23 | GUO Woody | 4% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 11% | 2% | |
24 | MA Nolan | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 39% | 21% | 2% |
25 | JIANG Aaron | 3% | 15% | 32% | 31% | 15% | 3% | - |
26 | ROBERTS Arthur | 2% | 17% | 40% | 31% | 9% | 1% | |
27 | RUBIN Nathan | - | 4% | 17% | 35% | 33% | 11% | |
28 | PATEL Krish | - | 3% | 16% | 36% | 34% | 12% | |
29 | LEWIS Michael | 2% | 12% | 29% | 33% | 19% | 5% | - |
30 | LI Timothy | 33% | 42% | 20% | 4% | - | - | - |
31 | KIM Evan | 6% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 9% | 1% | - |
32 | WONG Alexander | - | 4% | 16% | 33% | 33% | 13% | 2% |
33 | MYRAH Devin | 19% | 45% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - | |
34 | LU Ian | 5% | 22% | 36% | 26% | 9% | 1% | - |
35 | LEE Joshua | 8% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
36 | JAMES Kaden | 4% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - |
37 | WU MiEr | 14% | 34% | 33% | 16% | 4% | - | |
38 | AMIRAULT Jacob | 6% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 7% | 1% | |
39 | NGUYEN Ethan | 2% | 14% | 34% | 34% | 14% | 2% | - |
40 | YUE Bryan | 16% | 36% | 31% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
41 | ST CLAIR Soren | 2% | 14% | 33% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - |
42 | BREILING Sebastian | 5% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 11% | 2% | - |
43 | MAZAHERI Theodore | 27% | 41% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
44 | MEHROTRA Darsh | 32% | 44% | 20% | 4% | - | - | |
45 | YOON Jonathan | 41% | 43% | 14% | 2% | - | - | |
46 | LI Bryan | 5% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.