San Jose, CA - San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | XU William | 1% | 11% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 4% | |
| 2 | TANN Justin | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 7% |
| 3 | JIANG Anthony | - | - | 3% | 20% | 45% | 31% | |
| 3 | GHAYALOD ansh | - | 1% | 9% | 34% | 42% | 15% | |
| 5 | YANG Duncan | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 43% | 24% | |
| 6 | HOUTZ Jackson | - | - | 4% | 16% | 34% | 33% | 13% |
| 7 | YUN Jake | - | - | 4% | 23% | 45% | 28% | |
| 8 | FOX Nicholas | - | 5% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 1% |
| 9 | ZUBATIY Samuel | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 44% | 45% |
| 10 | OVERDECK Andrew | - | 5% | 20% | 36% | 28% | 9% | 1% |
| 11 | LIU Christopher X. | - | - | - | 3% | 21% | 50% | 25% |
| 12 | AVAKIAN Alec | - | 1% | 13% | 38% | 37% | 11% | |
| 13 | ROSBERG Dashiell W. | - | 1% | 8% | 31% | 42% | 18% | |
| 14 | LEE Conner M. | 2% | 15% | 34% | 33% | 15% | 2% | |
| 15 | POFF James | 3% | 16% | 32% | 31% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 16 | LUO George F. | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 38% | 17% | |
| 17 | LEUNG cameron | 1% | 11% | 38% | 36% | 13% | 1% | |
| 18 | JEFFRY Christian B. | - | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 41% | 20% |
| 19 | XU Andrew | - | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 42% | 23% |
| 20 | VO Minh Q. | 1% | 6% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
| 20 | LO Konnor | - | 1% | 9% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 6% |
| 20 | STONE Esmond A. | - | 3% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 3% |
| 23 | HOLZ William A. | - | 4% | 16% | 32% | 31% | 14% | 2% |
| 24 | SCOVILL Tenzin S. | 1% | 8% | 32% | 38% | 18% | 3% | |
| 25 | KIM Ryan | 2% | 16% | 38% | 33% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 26 | HAQ Omar M. | - | 4% | 21% | 39% | 29% | 7% | |
| 27 | BELLEMIN Thomas | 5% | 28% | 43% | 20% | 3% | - | |
| 28 | GAO Marcus | 18% | 47% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 29 | LIN Daniel | - | - | 4% | 16% | 33% | 34% | 13% |
| 30 | LEWALLEN Reece | 27% | 42% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 31 | GIANETTO Ethan K. | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 32% | 10% | |
| 32 | LEE Christopher M. | - | 3% | 22% | 41% | 27% | 6% | |
| 33 | RHEE Ethan N. | - | 2% | 13% | 35% | 37% | 13% | |
| 34 | GARDNER Gabriel | 3% | 19% | 37% | 29% | 10% | 1% | |
| 35 | LEE Derek J. | - | 2% | 12% | 35% | 39% | 12% | 1% |
| 36 | JONES Daniel | 12% | 37% | 34% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 37 | MILLER-MORTON Kahlo | 3% | 17% | 35% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 38 | KIBBAR Tomer L. | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 5% |
| 39 | WANG YiLe(Justin) | 31% | 50% | 17% | 2% | - | - | |
| 40 | RAMANAN Jaisimh | 2% | 13% | 32% | 33% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 41 | RAO Adrit | 27% | 46% | 23% | 4% | - | - | |
| 42 | MIYASAKI-CASTRO Masanobu | 8% | 31% | 37% | 19% | 5% | - | - |
| 43 | KUMAR Sachit | 24% | 43% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 44 | SHANKWILER Christopher | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 6% |
| 45 | SEAL Maximus R. | 37% | 46% | 14% | 2% | - | - | |
| 46 | CHIN Avery | 48% | 38% | 12% | 2% | - | - | |
| 47 | FILER Joshua | 51% | 40% | 8% | 1% | - | - | |
| 47 | OSENAR Sam | 29% | 47% | 21% | 3% | - | - | |
| 49 | RAMANAN Govind | 10% | 32% | 35% | 17% | 4% | 1% | - |
| 49 | ARNE Michael | 48% | 40% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 51 | JORGESON Charlie | 19% | 43% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 52 | FENG Zefan | 39% | 42% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.