San Jose, CA - San Jose, CA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | XU William | V V V V D | V V V V V | 2.7 | 4 | +1.3 |
| 2 | TANN Justin | V V V D V V | V V V V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
| 3 | JIANG Anthony | D V V V V | V V V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 3 | GHAYALOD ansh | V V V D V | V V V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 5 | YANG Duncan | V V V V V | V V D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
| 6 | HOUTZ Jackson | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.3 | 6 | +1.7 |
| 7 | YUN Jake | V V D V V | V V V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 8 | FOX Nicholas | D V V D V V | V V V D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
| 9 | ZUBATIY Samuel | V V V V V V | V D | 5.3 | 6 | +0.7 |
| 10 | OVERDECK Andrew | V V V V V V | V D | 3.2 | 6 | +2.8 |
| 11 | LIU Christopher X. | V V V V D V | V D | 5.0 | 5 | - |
| 12 | AVAKIAN Alec | V V V V D | V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 13 | ROSBERG Dashiell W. | V V V V D | V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 14 | LEE Conner M. | D V V V V | V V D | 2.5 | 4 | +1.5 |
| 15 | POFF James | V D V V V D | V V D | 2.5 | 4 | +1.5 |
| 16 | LUO George F. | V D V D V | V V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
| 17 | LEUNG cameron | V D V V V | D | 2.5 | 4 | +1.5 |
| 18 | JEFFRY Christian B. | D D V V V V | V D | 4.7 | 4 | -0.7 |
| 19 | XU Andrew | V V D V V D | V D | 4.8 | 4 | -0.8 |
| 20 | VO Minh Q. | D V V V D V | V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 20 | LO Konnor | V V V V D D | V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 20 | STONE Esmond A. | V V D V V D | V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 23 | HOLZ William A. | D V V V V D | V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 24 | SCOVILL Tenzin S. | D V D V V | V D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
| 25 | KIM Ryan | D V V D V D | V D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
| 26 | HAQ Omar M. | D D V D V | V D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
| 27 | BELLEMIN Thomas | V D D D V | V D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 28 | GAO Marcus | V V D D D | V D | 1.2 | 2 | +0.8 |
| 29 | LIN Daniel | V D D D D V | V D | 4.4 | 2 | -2.4 |
| 30 | LEWALLEN Reece | D D D D V V | V D | 1.1 | 2 | +0.9 |
| 31 | GIANETTO Ethan K. | D V D D D | V D | 3.3 | 1 | -2.3 |
| 32 | LEE Christopher M. | D V D D D | V D | 3.1 | 1 | -2.1 |
| 33 | RHEE Ethan N. | V D V V D | D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
| 34 | GARDNER Gabriel | V D D V V | D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
| 35 | LEE Derek J. | D D D V V V | D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
| 36 | JONES Daniel | V D D V D V | D | 1.6 | 3 | +1.4 |
| 37 | MILLER-MORTON Kahlo | V V D V D D | D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
| 38 | KIBBAR Tomer L. | V D V V D D | D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
| 39 | WANG YiLe(Justin) | D D V D V | D | 0.9 | 2 | +1.1 |
| 40 | RAMANAN Jaisimh | V V D D D D | D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
| 41 | RAO Adrit | D D D V D | D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
| 42 | MIYASAKI-CASTRO Masanobu | D D D D D V | D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
| 43 | KUMAR Sachit | D D D D V D | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
| 44 | SHANKWILER Christopher | D D D D D V | D | 3.9 | 1 | -2.9 |
| 45 | SEAL Maximus R. | D D D D D | D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 |
| 46 | CHIN Avery | D D D D D | D | 0.7 | 0 | -0.7 |
| 47 | FILER Joshua | D D D D D | D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 |
| 47 | OSENAR Sam | D D D D D | D | 1.0 | 0 | -1.0 |
| 49 | RAMANAN Govind | D D D D D D | D | 1.8 | 0 | -1.8 |
| 49 | ARNE Michael | D D D D D D | D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 |
| 51 | JORGESON Charlie | D D D D D D | D | 1.3 | 0 | -1.3 |
| 52 | FENG Zefan | D D D D D D | D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.