Fencing Academy of Denver - Littleton, CO, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | STRAUSS Luke | V V V V D V | V V V V V | 5.2 | 5 | -0.2 |
| 2 | LI Patrick | V V V V V | V V V V D | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 |
| 3 | CHOI Kaiden I. | V V V V V | V V V D | 3.6 | 5 | +1.4 |
| 3 | GAO Zachary | V V V D D V | V V V D | 5.1 | 4 | -1.1 |
| 5 | HARR Carver | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.2 | 6 | +1.8 |
| 6 | ALTMAN Jeff H. | V V V D V V | V V D | 5.4 | 5 | -0.4 |
| 7 | EVANS Tyler | D V D V D | V V D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 8 | TRAN Bryn L. | D D D D D | V V V D | 1.8 | 0 | -1.8 |
| 9 | AGGELER Donovan | V V D V V | V D | 2.6 | 4 | +1.4 |
| 10 | MCCOWN Ronan | D V V V V | V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 11 | BUERGISSER Kai | D V V V D V | V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
| 12 | PETERSON Matthew | D V D V V V | V D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
| 13 | BARON Sabina | V V D V D V | V D | 2.7 | 4 | +1.3 |
| 14 | MILEY Walker | D D V V V | V D | 1.0 | 3 | +2.0 |
| 15 | KENT IV David | V V V D D D | V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
| 16 | MACMILLAN Collin | D V D V V D | V D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
| 17 | PEARSON Heila | V V D V V V | D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
| 18 | GIOVAGNOLI Nolan | V V V D V | D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
| 19 | WELCH Bryant | V V D V V D | D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
| 20 | DANIS Blake M. | V V V D D | D | 3.7 | 3 | -0.7 |
| 21 | LEWIS Rachel | D D V V V D | D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 22 | NIEMIEC Mark | D D V V V D | D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
| 23 | GAMMILL Luke | V D D D V V | D | 1.9 | 3 | +1.1 |
| 24 | RASMUSSEN Nathan | V D D V D | D | 4.1 | 2 | -2.1 |
| 25 | RODRIGUES Nicholas | D D V D V | D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
| 26 | LEE Jayden J. | D V V D D | V D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 26 | LEWIS Cole | D D D V V | D | 0.8 | 2 | +1.2 |
| 28 | KENT Elizabeth J. | V D V D D | V D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
| 29 | FRENCH Phaelen | D D V D V D | V D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
| 30 | SKUBIC Wyatt | D V D V D D | V D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
| 31 | TIBBETTS Noah | V D D D D | V D | 2.6 | 1 | -1.6 |
| 32 | MCADOO Declan | D D D D V | V D | 3.2 | 1 | -2.2 |
| 33 | MU Jason | V D D V D | D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
| 34 | REDD Andrew C. | D V D D D | D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
| 35 | FUNSTON Lauren L. | D D D D V D | D | 2.8 | 1 | -1.8 |
| 36 | FOX Alexander | D D D D V D | D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
| 37 | NANNEMANN Chandler | D D D V D D | D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
| 38 | MCGOUGH Kevin | D D D D D D | D | 2.0 | 0 | -2.0 |
| 39 | GREGER Sarah | D D D D D D | D | 1.8 | 0 | -1.8 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.