San Jose, CA - San Jose, CA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | KRASTEV Minna | V V V V V | V V V V V | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
2 | KER Grace | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 5.1 | 6 | +0.9 |
3 | ANDRES Charmaine G. | V V V V V | V V V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
3 | GHAYALOD reya | V V V V V | V V V D | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 |
5 | JUNG Irene | V V V V V V | V V D | 3.3 | 6 | +2.7 |
6 | KONG Carys H. | V V V V D | V V D | 4.7 | 4 | -0.7 |
7 | WANG Zidan | V D V V V | V V D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
8 | HITOMI Nadya | V V D V V | V V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
9 | TSE Angelina | V V D V V | V D | 4.6 | 4 | -0.6 |
10 | SEAL Cameron I. | V D D V V V | V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
11 | RAMIREZ Mirka A. | V V D D V V | V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
12 | LO Chloe | D V V D V V | V D | 4.4 | 4 | -0.4 |
13 | LIU Sydney | V V D D V | V D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
14 | YANG Lea | V D V D V | V D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
15 | LIN Lauren | V V D D D D | V D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
16 | BUCKHOUSE Talia | D D D D D | V V D | 0.7 | 0 | -0.7 |
17 | GOMES Diana C. | V V V V V | D | 2.8 | 5 | +2.2 |
18 | FANG Victoria W. | V D V V V V | D | 5.2 | 5 | -0.2 |
19 | LIU Emily | D V V V D | D | 1.8 | 3 | +1.2 |
20 | NASIROV Zemfira | V V V D D | D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
21 | CHAN Jolene | V V D D D V | D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
22 | LEMUS-IAKOVIDOU ALEXANDRA | D D V V V D | D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
23 | REGANTI Sitara | V D V V D D | D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
24 | HU Michelle | D D D V V | D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
24 | XA-CHIN Sara | V D V D D | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
26 | FENG Alicia G. | D D D V V | D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
27 | CHEN Elaine | D V D V D | D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
28 | DIECK Miranda P. | D V D D D | V D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
29 | HUAI Delilah | D D D D V | V D | 3.1 | 1 | -2.1 |
30 | STONE Coral | D D D D D | V D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
31 | KATILA-MIIKKULAINEN Alli | D D D D D D | V D | 1.9 | 0 | -1.9 |
32 | CUI Jinzhu | D D D D D D | V D | 1.8 | 0 | -1.8 |
33 | SHEARER Alena | D D V D D | D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
34 | NELLIGAN Hutton | D D V D D | D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
35 | KONG Daniela | D D V D D D | D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
36 | SNOAD Indy | D D V D D D | D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
37 | CAPLICE Ella | D D D D D | D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 |
38 | POIRIER Hailey | D D D D D | D | 0.7 | 0 | -0.7 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
---|---|---|---|
Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.