San Jose, CA - San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | KRASTEV Minna | - | - | 1% | 7% | 34% | 59% | |
| 2 | KER Grace | - | - | - | 4% | 18% | 41% | 37% |
| 3 | ANDRES Charmaine G. | - | - | 2% | 19% | 58% | 21% | |
| 3 | GHAYALOD reya | - | - | 1% | 10% | 37% | 52% | |
| 5 | JUNG Irene | - | 5% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 11% | 1% |
| 6 | KONG Carys H. | - | - | - | 3% | 26% | 71% | |
| 7 | WANG Zidan | - | 7% | 26% | 40% | 24% | 3% | |
| 8 | HITOMI Nadya | - | 5% | 23% | 41% | 26% | 4% | |
| 9 | TSE Angelina | - | - | - | 4% | 35% | 61% | |
| 10 | SEAL Cameron I. | 1% | 7% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 6% | 1% |
| 11 | RAMIREZ Mirka A. | - | 5% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 12% | 1% |
| 12 | LO Chloe | - | - | 3% | 15% | 35% | 36% | 10% |
| 13 | LIU Sydney | 1% | 10% | 31% | 38% | 18% | 2% | |
| 14 | YANG Lea | 2% | 16% | 36% | 33% | 12% | 1% | |
| 15 | LIN Lauren | 1% | 8% | 25% | 35% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
| 16 | BUCKHOUSE Talia | 44% | 41% | 14% | 2% | - | - | |
| 17 | GOMES Diana C. | 1% | 8% | 27% | 40% | 22% | 2% | |
| 18 | FANG Victoria W. | - | - | - | 3% | 14% | 39% | 44% |
| 19 | LIU Emily | 8% | 33% | 38% | 17% | 3% | - | |
| 20 | NASIROV Zemfira | 4% | 24% | 45% | 24% | 3% | - | |
| 21 | CHAN Jolene | 2% | 13% | 31% | 33% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 22 | LEMUS-IAKOVIDOU ALEXANDRA | - | 4% | 18% | 33% | 30% | 13% | 2% |
| 23 | REGANTI Sitara | 4% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 24 | HU Michelle | 1% | 12% | 38% | 39% | 9% | - | |
| 24 | XA-CHIN Sara | 6% | 27% | 40% | 22% | 5% | - | |
| 26 | FENG Alicia G. | 2% | 18% | 38% | 32% | 10% | 1% | |
| 27 | CHEN Elaine | 2% | 17% | 37% | 32% | 11% | 1% | |
| 28 | DIECK Miranda P. | 4% | 24% | 39% | 26% | 6% | - | |
| 29 | HUAI Delilah | - | 4% | 20% | 40% | 30% | 6% | |
| 30 | STONE Coral | 21% | 47% | 26% | 5% | - | - | |
| 31 | KATILA-MIIKKULAINEN Alli | 7% | 28% | 36% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 32 | CUI Jinzhu | 7% | 30% | 39% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 33 | SHEARER Alena | 7% | 31% | 39% | 19% | 4% | - | |
| 34 | NELLIGAN Hutton | 35% | 45% | 17% | 2% | - | - | |
| 35 | KONG Daniela | 32% | 41% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 36 | SNOAD Indy | 10% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 37 | CAPLICE Ella | 40% | 42% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
| 38 | POIRIER Hailey | 44% | 40% | 13% | 2% | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.