San Jose, CA - San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | KRASTEV Minna | - | - | 1% | 7% | 34% | 59% | |
2 | KER Grace | - | - | - | 4% | 18% | 41% | 37% |
3 | ANDRES Charmaine G. | - | - | 2% | 19% | 58% | 21% | |
3 | GHAYALOD reya | - | - | 1% | 10% | 37% | 52% | |
5 | JUNG Irene | - | 5% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 11% | 1% |
6 | KONG Carys H. | - | - | - | 3% | 26% | 71% | |
7 | WANG Zidan | - | 7% | 26% | 40% | 24% | 3% | |
8 | HITOMI Nadya | - | 5% | 23% | 41% | 26% | 4% | |
9 | TSE Angelina | - | - | - | 4% | 35% | 61% | |
10 | SEAL Cameron I. | 1% | 7% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 6% | 1% |
11 | RAMIREZ Mirka A. | - | 5% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 12% | 1% |
12 | LO Chloe | - | - | 3% | 15% | 35% | 36% | 10% |
13 | LIU Sydney | 1% | 10% | 31% | 38% | 18% | 2% | |
14 | YANG Lea | 2% | 16% | 36% | 33% | 12% | 1% | |
15 | LIN Lauren | 1% | 8% | 25% | 35% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
16 | BUCKHOUSE Talia | 44% | 41% | 14% | 2% | - | - | |
17 | GOMES Diana C. | 1% | 8% | 27% | 40% | 22% | 2% | |
18 | FANG Victoria W. | - | - | - | 3% | 14% | 39% | 44% |
19 | LIU Emily | 8% | 33% | 38% | 17% | 3% | - | |
20 | NASIROV Zemfira | 4% | 24% | 45% | 24% | 3% | - | |
21 | CHAN Jolene | 2% | 13% | 31% | 33% | 17% | 4% | - |
22 | LEMUS-IAKOVIDOU ALEXANDRA | - | 4% | 18% | 33% | 30% | 13% | 2% |
23 | REGANTI Sitara | 4% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 11% | 2% | - |
24 | HU Michelle | 1% | 12% | 38% | 39% | 9% | - | |
24 | XA-CHIN Sara | 6% | 27% | 40% | 22% | 5% | - | |
26 | FENG Alicia G. | 2% | 18% | 38% | 32% | 10% | 1% | |
27 | CHEN Elaine | 2% | 17% | 37% | 32% | 11% | 1% | |
28 | DIECK Miranda P. | 4% | 24% | 39% | 26% | 6% | - | |
29 | HUAI Delilah | - | 4% | 20% | 40% | 30% | 6% | |
30 | STONE Coral | 21% | 47% | 26% | 5% | - | - | |
31 | KATILA-MIIKKULAINEN Alli | 7% | 28% | 36% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
32 | CUI Jinzhu | 7% | 30% | 39% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
33 | SHEARER Alena | 7% | 31% | 39% | 19% | 4% | - | |
34 | NELLIGAN Hutton | 35% | 45% | 17% | 2% | - | - | |
35 | KONG Daniela | 32% | 41% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
36 | SNOAD Indy | 10% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
37 | CAPLICE Ella | 40% | 42% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
38 | POIRIER Hailey | 44% | 40% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.