San Jose, CA - San Jose, CA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | MARSEE Samantha | D V V V V V | V V V V V | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
| 2 | CALLAHAN Chase J. | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 5.1 | 6 | +0.9 |
| 3 | ANDRES Katherine A. | V V V V D V | V V V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
| 3 | KRASTEV Minna | V V V V V V | V V V D | 4.9 | 6 | +1.1 |
| 5 | CODY Alexandra C. | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.5 | 6 | +1.5 |
| 6 | ANDRES Charmaine G. | V V V V D V | V V D | 4.7 | 5 | +0.3 |
| 7 | JUNG Irene | V D V D V V | V V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
| 8 | HERRERA LARA Luisa F. | V D D V D V | V V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
| 9 | SHEARER Natalie E. | V V V V V V | V D | 4.9 | 6 | +1.1 |
| 10 | XU Ellen | V V V V V V | V D | 5.1 | 6 | +0.9 |
| 11 | PENG Florella | V V V V V D | V D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
| 12 | CHIN Sophia J. | V V V V V D | V D | 5.0 | 5 | - |
| 13 | FANG Victoria W. | V D V V V V | V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
| 14 | PLONKA Kaley V. | D D V V V V | V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 15 | YANG Lea | V V V D V D | V D | 2.1 | 4 | +1.9 |
| 16 | YEN Natalie | V V V V D D | V D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
| 17 | KER Grace | V D D V V V | D | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 |
| 18 | WANG Zidan | D V V V V D | D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 19 | CHIN Elise | V V D V D V | D | 2.6 | 4 | +1.4 |
| 20 | BARNOVITZ Maya | V V D D V V | D | 1.6 | 4 | +2.4 |
| 21 | TSE Angelina | V V V D D V | D | 4.9 | 4 | -0.9 |
| 22 | GOMES Diana C. | D V V D D V | D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 23 | GHAYALOD reya | D D V V D V | V D | 4.3 | 3 | -1.3 |
| 24 | KONG Carys H. | D V V D V D | V D | 4.9 | 3 | -1.9 |
| 25 | TSOI Julie | D V D D V D | V D | 3.2 | 2 | -1.2 |
| 26 | HITOMI Nadya | D V D D V D | V D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 27 | LEMUS-IAKOVIDOU ALEXANDRA | D D D V V D | V D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
| 28 | DIECK Miranda P. | V D D D V D | V D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 29 | TONG Jessie | D D V D D D | V D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
| 30 | PYO Penelope E. | D D V D D D | V D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 |
| 31 | BUCKHOUSE Talia | V D D D D D | V D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
| 32 | KATILA-MIIKKULAINEN Alli | D D D D D D | V D | 1.4 | 0 | -1.4 |
| 33 | RAMIREZ Mirka A. | D D D V V D | D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
| 34 | LIN Grace | V D D D V D | D | 0.8 | 2 | +1.2 |
| 35 | HUANG MADELINE | D D D D D V | D | 0.6 | 1 | +0.4 |
| 36 | TUNG Renee | D D D D D V | D | 2.7 | 1 | -1.7 |
| 37 | REGANTI Sitara | V D D D D D | D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
| 38 | LI Chengxuan | D D D D D D | D | 0.7 | 0 | -0.7 |
| 39 | LIN Lauren | D D D D D D | D | 2.2 | 0 | -2.2 |
| 40 | STREU Mirabel | D D D D D D | D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 |
| 40 | SHAPONA Lillian | D D D D D D | D | 1.0 | 0 | -1.0 |
| 42 | BARTON Mele | D D D D D D | D | 2.1 | 0 | -2.1 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.