The Southern Y8/RYC/RJCC/RPC/ROC (VET/D1A/DV2)/TEAM

Cadet Men’s Saber (CDTMS)

Sunday, October 12, 2025 at 8:00 AM

Register

John T. Rhodes Sport Center - Myrtle Beach, SC

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 2290 2347 - 2210
5 - 8 2019 2097 - 1883
9 - 16 1750 1846 - 1618
17 - 24 1265 1551 - 706

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 Gurevich, Benjamin Alle Fencing Club C25 2347 2096.18
2 Burgess, Beckham Athens Fencing Club B25 2347 2080.13
3 Rinaldi, Savio Capital Fencing Academy C25 2254 2002.16
4 Chang, Ethan Nazlymov Fencing Foundation C25 2210 1953.77
5 Briseno, Ethan Nellya Fencers U 2097 1808.93
6 Womack, Theodore Athens Fencing Club D25 2068 1668.91
7 Edwards, Farren Premier Fencing Alliance E25 2027 1666.55
8 Liu, Jayden Capital Fencing Academy U 1883 1621.38
9 Chou, Qianhao Forge Fencing Teams DUR U 1846 1559.54
10 Pak, Andrew Jacksonville Fencing Club D25 1832 1527.47
11 Toscano, Sebastian Jacksonville Fencing Club D25 1774 1454.08
12 Miller, Kevin "Chase" Premier Fencing Alliance U 1811 1361.76
13 Lorenzini, Samuel Athens Fencing Club D25 1758 1329.11
14 Kohler, Vaughn Nellya Fencers E25 1632 1320.99
15 Sheridan, Filip North Florida Fencing Club U 1725 1272.69
16 Yeazel, Colin Forge Fencing Teams DUR E25 1618 1272.12
17 Pipke, Garrett Nova Fencing Club U 1551 1229.79
18 Bramlett, Myer Forge Fencing Teams DUR E25 1511 1195.78
19 Barrionuevo, Nicolas Alle Fencing Club U 1404 1036.20
20 Allen, Paxton Nellya Fencers U 1389 994.34
21 Dulay, Peter Jacksonville Fencing Club D25 1400 957.76
22 Prosper, Nathaniel Nova Fencing Club U 1033 542.92
23 Teplesky, Sasha Nova Fencing Club U 706 < 0
24 Cottle, Finnegan Triple Threat Fencing Academy U 1129 < 0

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!