San Jose, CA - San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | HOLZ Daniel | - | - | 1% | 7% | 33% | 60% | |
| 2 | GAO Albert | - | - | - | 4% | 17% | 41% | 37% |
| 3 | LIN Daniel | - | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 42% | 21% |
| 3 | QIU Nathan | - | - | - | 4% | 19% | 41% | 36% |
| 5 | PATIL Aaryan A. | - | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 39% | 17% |
| 6 | JOO Jeein | - | - | 2% | 12% | 33% | 39% | 15% |
| 7 | COOK Cole | 1% | 11% | 31% | 36% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 8 | CHEN Lohen | - | 3% | 15% | 32% | 33% | 15% | 2% |
| 9 | HAO Anwen | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 5% |
| 10 | RICHARDS Jackson D. | 1% | 11% | 32% | 37% | 17% | 2% | |
| 11 | MCCARTHY Gabriel | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 37% | 19% | 2% |
| 12 | TAO Jeffrey | - | - | - | - | 5% | 30% | 65% |
| 13 | OSENAR Sam | 5% | 27% | 40% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 14 | LEE Christopher M. | - | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 43% | 26% |
| 15 | LEE Derek J. | 1% | 8% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
| 16 | YANG Dylan | - | 5% | 21% | 37% | 27% | 8% | 1% |
| 17 | MIYASAKI-CASTRO Masanobu | 5% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 18 | GAO Marcus | 3% | 18% | 35% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 19 | LAM Ethan | 8% | 30% | 37% | 19% | 5% | - | - |
| 20 | PEREIRA Beckham | 1% | 12% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 21 | RAMANAN Jaisimh | 2% | 16% | 36% | 32% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 22 | KUMAR Sachit | 47% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - | - | |
| 23 | RAO Adrit | 3% | 21% | 39% | 28% | 8% | 1% | |
| 24 | LLAMAS Martin | 2% | 17% | 36% | 32% | 11% | 1% | |
| 25 | FILER Joshua | 30% | 42% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 26 | ZHU Kevin | 2% | 13% | 30% | 33% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 27 | ANDRES Michael | - | 2% | 12% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 3% |
| 28 | HRISTOV Kris | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 36% | 17% | 2% |
| 29 | RAMANAN Govind | 1% | 13% | 32% | 33% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 30 | SHERES Asher | 1% | 12% | 32% | 36% | 17% | 2% | |
| 31 | LEWALLEN Reece | 2% | 18% | 36% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 32 | JOHNSON Alon H. | 51% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 33 | KOVALEV Daniil N. | - | 3% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 3% |
| 34 | TUNG Ryan | 2% | 14% | 34% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 35 | CHOW William T. | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 4% |
| 36 | SHANKWILER Christopher | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 5% |
| 37 | RADJABLI Maximillian | 16% | 37% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 38 | MISHRA Aadi | 3% | 18% | 36% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 39 | BAHARUDIN Jayden | 61% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 40 | JORGESON Charlie | 34% | 43% | 19% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 41 | DEBNATH Kirin | 11% | 35% | 36% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.