San Jose, CA - San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | HOLZ Daniel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 60% | |
| 2 | GAO Albert | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 37% |
| 3 | LIN Daniel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 21% |
| 3 | QIU Nathan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 36% |
| 5 | PATIL Aaryan A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 17% |
| 6 | JOO Jeein | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 15% |
| 7 | COOK Cole | 100% | 99% | 88% | 57% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 8 | CHEN Lohen | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 50% | 18% | 2% |
| 9 | HAO Anwen | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 30% | 5% |
| 10 | RICHARDS Jackson D. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 57% | 19% | 2% | |
| 11 | MCCARTHY Gabriel | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 22% | 2% |
| 12 | TAO Jeffrey | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 65% |
| 13 | OSENAR Sam | 100% | 95% | 68% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 14 | LEE Christopher M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 26% |
| 15 | LEE Derek J. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 30% | 7% | 1% |
| 16 | YANG Dylan | 100% | 100% | 94% | 73% | 36% | 9% | 1% |
| 17 | MIYASAKI-CASTRO Masanobu | 100% | 95% | 70% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 18 | GAO Marcus | 100% | 97% | 79% | 44% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 19 | LAM Ethan | 100% | 92% | 61% | 24% | 5% | - | - |
| 20 | PEREIRA Beckham | 100% | 99% | 87% | 57% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 21 | RAMANAN Jaisimh | 100% | 98% | 82% | 46% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 22 | KUMAR Sachit | 100% | 53% | 14% | 2% | - | - | |
| 23 | RAO Adrit | 100% | 97% | 76% | 37% | 9% | 1% | |
| 24 | LLAMAS Martin | 100% | 98% | 80% | 44% | 12% | 1% | |
| 25 | FILER Joshua | 100% | 70% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 26 | ZHU Kevin | 100% | 98% | 85% | 56% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 27 | ANDRES Michael | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 58% | 23% | 3% |
| 28 | HRISTOV Kris | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 19% | 2% |
| 29 | RAMANAN Govind | 100% | 99% | 86% | 54% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 30 | SHERES Asher | 100% | 99% | 87% | 55% | 18% | 2% | |
| 31 | LEWALLEN Reece | 100% | 98% | 80% | 44% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 32 | JOHNSON Alon H. | 100% | 49% | 12% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 33 | KOVALEV Daniil N. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 49% | 17% | 3% |
| 34 | TUNG Ryan | 100% | 98% | 84% | 50% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 35 | CHOW William T. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 61% | 24% | 4% |
| 36 | SHANKWILER Christopher | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 31% | 5% |
| 37 | RADJABLI Maximillian | 100% | 84% | 47% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 38 | MISHRA Aadi | 100% | 97% | 79% | 44% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 39 | BAHARUDIN Jayden | 100% | 39% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 40 | JORGESON Charlie | 100% | 66% | 23% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 41 | DEBNATH Kirin | 100% | 89% | 53% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.