The Fencing Center SYC

Y-14 Women's Foil

Sunday, October 6, 2019 at 1:30 PM

San Jose, CA - San Jose, CA, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 YHIP Mikaela M. 100% 100% 99% 89% 60% 19%
2 LI Phoebe J. 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 89% 50%
3 SOOD Ishani S. 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 86% 41%
3 CASTANEDA Erika L. 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 92% 58%
5 SULEIMAN Alena J. 100% 100% 99% 94% 74% 37% 6%
6 GEBALA Gabrielle Grace A. 100% 100% 100% 99% 93% 70% 28%
7 CHO Gracie L. 100% 100% 100% 97% 82% 39%
8 CHO Cameron S. 100% 100% 100% 100% 97% 78% 27%
9 WANDJI Anais 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 90% 47%
10 LEE Brianna J. 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 93% 61%
11 KOROL Neta 100% 100% 99% 94% 77% 43% 11%
12 CAO Arianna L. 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 96% 70%
13 KONG Olivia 100% 100% 100% 96% 79% 45% 11%
14 LAU Chloe M. 100% 100% 100% 96% 79% 39% 7%
15 FERNANDES Thea 100% 100% 99% 94% 76% 42% 11%
16 SHIH Diane 100% 100% 100% 96% 78% 39% 7%
17 OH Erin H. 100% 100% 100% 97% 85% 54% 17%
18 KIM Katherine 100% 100% 100% 95% 77% 42% 10%
19 SUN Chien-Yu 100% 100% 97% 76% 35% 7%
20 WANG Chloe 100% 99% 90% 61% 23% 3%
21 CASTANEDA Keira 100% 100% 99% 92% 63% 22% 2%
22 DE LA CRUZ Eden 100% 100% 100% 95% 72% 27% 3%
23 LEE Bethanie 100% 100% 99% 93% 71% 33% 5%
24 SHITAMOTO Audrey F. 100% 100% 99% 91% 62% 21% 2%
25 KOROL Dana 100% 100% 98% 83% 47% 10%
26 CUI Amy 100% 99% 91% 64% 26% 4%
27 LOCKE Savannah 100% 100% 98% 85% 53% 15%
28 KIM Hyunchae Y. 100% 99% 93% 72% 37% 9% 1%
29 DANG Elizabeth H. 100% 98% 82% 48% 17% 3% -
30 KOSLOW Amicie 100% 96% 77% 43% 14% 2% -
31 CHANG Elizabeth 100% 100% 99% 92% 62% 22% 2%
32 WELBORN Calissa 100% 96% 74% 35% 8% 1%
33 NAMGALAURI Mariam 100% 100% 100% 100% 96% 71% 22%
34 HWANG Jungmin 100% 99% 88% 60% 24% 5% -
35 HSIUNG Samantha 100% 99% 90% 63% 26% 4% -
36 NAIR Supriya 100% 96% 77% 42% 13% 2% -
37 TOM Caitlyn 100% 100% 96% 80% 50% 18% 3%
38 TALWALKAR Apoorva 100% 100% 100% 93% 67% 24%
39 DING Abigail 100% 100% 99% 88% 55% 15%
40 FUNG Vera 100% 90% 38% 7% 1% -
41 CHIRASHNYA Mika 100% 99% 89% 56% 16% 2% -
42 RANDOLPH Piper 100% 99% 93% 71% 37% 10% 1%
43 HOBSON Ava 100% 98% 85% 54% 18% 2% -
44 FUNG Emma 100% 98% 87% 60% 27% 7% 1%
45 HAN Crystal 100% 99% 94% 72% 35% 8% -
46 HAN Ashley 100% 91% 61% 24% 4% - -
47 ZHUANG Christina 100% 100% 92% 67% 32% 8% 1%
48 OTEYZA Camille 100% 95% 73% 35% 8% 1% -
49 LUO Sandra J. 100% 100% 94% 62% 22% 3%
50 WANG Zoie Z. 100% 98% 86% 52% 18% 2%
51 LEE Samantha X. 100% 85% 46% 13% 2% -
52 ZHENG Zoe 100% 57% 16% 2% - -
53 WANG Celine S. 100% 93% 65% 28% 6% 1% -
54 YEN Natalie 100% 99% 94% 73% 39% 11% 1%
55 HO Rachel E. 100% 100% 97% 84% 54% 20% 3%
56 UMAP Arna 100% 92% 63% 27% 7% 1% -
57 NICKOLOV Nora 100% 80% 33% 6% - - -
58 LEE Ji Ahn 100% 99% 90% 65% 30% 8% 1%
59 PISHARODI smriti 100% 77% 36% 9% 1% - -
60 PATTERSON Natalia 100% 21% 2% - - - -
61 GONG Chloe 100% 91% 60% 23% 4% - -
62 STRUGAR Steliana 100% 85% 47% 15% 2% - -
63 BEAVER Hannah 100% 93% 66% 31% 8% 1% -
64 GAMRADT Taylor 100% 92% 60% 22% 4% -
65 RAO Sonia D. 100% 93% 66% 30% 7% 1% -
66 OLSHANSKY Eliora S. 100% 95% 74% 37% 9% 1% -
67 ZHANG Eunice 100% 99% 89% 59% 25% 6% 1%
68 SHEKAR Anuva 100% 96% 78% 46% 16% 3% -
69 MANN Sophia J. 100% 98% 76% 31% 6% - -
70 DAYAL Saahira 100% 96% 56% 16% 2% - -
71 TSANG Catherine 100% 79% 40% 12% 2% - -
72 MU Allison 100% 64% 20% 3% - - -
73 ZHANG Selena 100% 97% 78% 37% 8% 1% -
74 LUH Mia P. 100% 92% 62% 25% 5% - -
75 SULLIVAN Emma 100% 82% 44% 14% 2% - -
76 BEAVER Kaitlyn 100% 78% 37% 10% 1% - -
77 DAVIS Cate 100% 79% 38% 10% 1% - -
77 THOMAS Saejel 100% 31% 4% - - - -
79 BOLES Amanda X. 100% 67% 24% 4% - -
80 ENRILE Erica 100% 25% 2% - - -
81 CHEN Chloe I. 100% 98% 85% 55% 21% 4% -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.