San Jose, CA - San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | YHIP Mikaela M. | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 40% | 19% | |
| 2 | LI Phoebe J. | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 39% | 50% |
| 3 | SOOD Ishani S. | - | - | - | 1% | 13% | 44% | 41% |
| 3 | CASTANEDA Erika L. | - | - | - | 1% | 7% | 34% | 58% |
| 5 | SULEIMAN Alena J. | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 38% | 31% | 6% |
| 6 | GEBALA Gabrielle Grace A. | - | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 42% | 28% |
| 7 | CHO Gracie L. | - | - | 3% | 16% | 42% | 39% | |
| 8 | CHO Cameron S. | - | - | - | 3% | 19% | 51% | 27% |
| 9 | WANDJI Anais | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 44% | 47% |
| 10 | LEE Brianna J. | - | - | - | 1% | 6% | 32% | 61% |
| 11 | KOROL Neta | - | 1% | 5% | 18% | 34% | 32% | 11% |
| 12 | CAO Arianna L. | - | - | - | - | 4% | 26% | 70% |
| 13 | KONG Olivia | - | - | 4% | 16% | 35% | 34% | 11% |
| 14 | LAU Chloe M. | - | - | 4% | 17% | 39% | 32% | 7% |
| 15 | FERNANDES Thea | - | 1% | 5% | 18% | 34% | 31% | 11% |
| 16 | SHIH Diane | - | - | 4% | 18% | 40% | 32% | 7% |
| 17 | OH Erin H. | - | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 37% | 17% |
| 18 | KIM Katherine | - | - | 5% | 18% | 35% | 32% | 10% |
| 19 | SUN Chien-Yu | - | 3% | 21% | 41% | 29% | 7% | |
| 20 | WANG Chloe | 1% | 9% | 29% | 38% | 20% | 3% | |
| 21 | CASTANEDA Keira | - | 1% | 7% | 29% | 41% | 20% | 2% |
| 22 | DE LA CRUZ Eden | - | - | 5% | 23% | 45% | 23% | 3% |
| 23 | LEE Bethanie | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 38% | 28% | 5% |
| 24 | SHITAMOTO Audrey F. | - | 1% | 8% | 30% | 40% | 19% | 2% |
| 25 | KOROL Dana | - | 2% | 14% | 36% | 36% | 10% | |
| 26 | CUI Amy | 1% | 8% | 27% | 38% | 22% | 4% | |
| 27 | LOCKE Savannah | - | 2% | 12% | 33% | 38% | 15% | |
| 28 | KIM Hyunchae Y. | 1% | 6% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
| 29 | DANG Elizabeth H. | 2% | 16% | 35% | 31% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 30 | KOSLOW Amicie | 4% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 31 | CHANG Elizabeth | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 41% | 20% | 2% |
| 32 | WELBORN Calissa | 4% | 22% | 39% | 27% | 7% | 1% | |
| 33 | NAMGALAURI Mariam | - | - | - | 4% | 25% | 48% | 22% |
| 34 | HWANG Jungmin | 1% | 10% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 35 | HSIUNG Samantha | 1% | 9% | 27% | 38% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 36 | NAIR Supriya | 4% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 37 | TOM Caitlyn | - | 4% | 15% | 31% | 31% | 15% | 3% |
| 38 | TALWALKAR Apoorva | - | - | 6% | 27% | 43% | 24% | |
| 39 | DING Abigail | - | 1% | 11% | 33% | 40% | 15% | |
| 40 | FUNG Vera | 10% | 53% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 41 | CHIRASHNYA Mika | 1% | 10% | 34% | 40% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 42 | RANDOLPH Piper | 1% | 6% | 22% | 34% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
| 43 | HOBSON Ava | 2% | 13% | 32% | 35% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 44 | FUNG Emma | 2% | 11% | 27% | 33% | 20% | 6% | 1% |
| 45 | HAN Crystal | 1% | 6% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 8% | - |
| 46 | HAN Ashley | 9% | 30% | 37% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 47 | ZHUANG Christina | - | 7% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 8% | 1% |
| 48 | OTEYZA Camille | 5% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 49 | LUO Sandra J. | - | 6% | 31% | 40% | 19% | 3% | |
| 50 | WANG Zoie Z. | 2% | 13% | 33% | 35% | 15% | 2% | |
| 51 | LEE Samantha X. | 15% | 39% | 32% | 11% | 2% | - | |
| 52 | ZHENG Zoe | 43% | 41% | 14% | 2% | - | - | |
| 53 | WANG Celine S. | 7% | 28% | 37% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 54 | YEN Natalie | 1% | 6% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 10% | 1% |
| 55 | HO Rachel E. | - | 2% | 13% | 30% | 33% | 17% | 3% |
| 56 | UMAP Arna | 8% | 29% | 36% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 57 | NICKOLOV Nora | 20% | 47% | 27% | 6% | - | - | - |
| 58 | LEE Ji Ahn | 1% | 9% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
| 59 | PISHARODI smriti | 23% | 41% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 60 | PATTERSON Natalia | 79% | 20% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
| 61 | GONG Chloe | 9% | 31% | 37% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 62 | STRUGAR Steliana | 15% | 37% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 63 | BEAVER Hannah | 7% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 64 | GAMRADT Taylor | 8% | 32% | 38% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 65 | RAO Sonia D. | 7% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 66 | OLSHANSKY Eliora S. | 5% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 67 | ZHANG Eunice | 1% | 11% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 5% | 1% |
| 68 | SHEKAR Anuva | 4% | 18% | 33% | 29% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 69 | MANN Sophia J. | 2% | 23% | 45% | 25% | 6% | - | - |
| 70 | DAYAL Saahira | 4% | 39% | 41% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 71 | TSANG Catherine | 21% | 39% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 72 | MU Allison | 36% | 44% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 73 | ZHANG Selena | 3% | 19% | 41% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 74 | LUH Mia P. | 8% | 30% | 37% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 75 | SULLIVAN Emma | 18% | 38% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 76 | BEAVER Kaitlyn | 22% | 40% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 77 | DAVIS Cate | 21% | 41% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 77 | THOMAS Saejel | 69% | 27% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
| 79 | BOLES Amanda X. | 33% | 44% | 20% | 4% | - | - | |
| 80 | ENRILE Erica | 75% | 23% | 2% | - | - | - | |
| 81 | CHEN Chloe I. | 2% | 13% | 31% | 34% | 17% | 4% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.