San Jose, CA - San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | MACHULSKY Leehi | - | - | - | 3% | 16% | 42% | 40% |
| 2 | LAN Alice S. | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 35% | 56% |
| 3 | DANIEL Olivia | - | - | - | 1% | 20% | 60% | 18% |
| 3 | GEBALA Natalie Brooke A. | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 36% | 54% |
| 5 | PEI Audrey | - | - | - | 3% | 19% | 44% | 33% |
| 6 | LABRACHE Ella P. | - | - | 3% | 13% | 30% | 36% | 18% |
| 7 | GAUR Ishi | - | - | 3% | 17% | 39% | 33% | 9% |
| 8 | ZHEREBCHEVSKA Veronika | - | 5% | 19% | 33% | 29% | 12% | 2% |
| 9 | DU Angela | 1% | 9% | 24% | 33% | 23% | 8% | 1% |
| 10 | POPOVICI Alina B. | - | - | 4% | 19% | 37% | 31% | 8% |
| 11 | LEE Kaitlyn M. | - | - | 4% | 19% | 43% | 29% | 5% |
| 12 | CHIRASHNYA Noya | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 5% |
| 13 | PACHECO Naomi | 1% | 11% | 27% | 33% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
| 14 | LEE Rachel | - | 5% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 9% | 1% |
| 15 | CHANG Celine A. | - | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 33% | 12% |
| 16 | HAU Olivia | 1% | 5% | 18% | 31% | 29% | 14% | 2% |
| 17 | KIM Zoe L. | - | - | - | 4% | 19% | 43% | 34% |
| 18 | QURESHI Nisa | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 39% | 24% | 5% |
| 19 | BARBARA Camille | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 4% |
| 20 | STRATTON Alexia | 1% | 6% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 6% | - |
| 21 | HUANG audrey | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 37% | 24% | 4% |
| 22 | LI Charlotte | 2% | 15% | 33% | 32% | 15% | 4% | - |
| 23 | SIVAGAR Fiona | 1% | 7% | 25% | 38% | 23% | 6% | - |
| 24 | LO Sabrina S. | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 38% | 28% | 5% |
| 25 | SAID Riana | 1% | 7% | 30% | 37% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 26 | YIN Grace | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 32% | 12% | 1% |
| 27 | GALLON Maya S. | - | - | 2% | 14% | 33% | 36% | 14% |
| 28 | SHARMA Sanvi | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 37% | 20% | 3% |
| 29 | SHU Muyang | 1% | 9% | 27% | 35% | 21% | 6% | - |
| 30 | DERAKSHANDEH Donya | - | 4% | 20% | 37% | 29% | 9% | 1% |
| 31 | CHEN Clara | 23% | 45% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 32 | PACHECO Evangeline | 1% | 8% | 25% | 36% | 23% | 6% | - |
| 33 | DALEY Keira | 17% | 41% | 32% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 34 | GAURIAT Jade S. | 2% | 18% | 44% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 35 | WANG Grace | 48% | 42% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 36 | HABERMAN Hailey | 1% | 9% | 32% | 37% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 37 | ZHOU Ashlee | 4% | 25% | 43% | 23% | 4% | - | - |
| 38 | SIMHADRI Meghana | 22% | 43% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 39 | BHATT Anisha | 28% | 52% | 17% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 40 | COSCI Angelina | 9% | 35% | 36% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
| 41 | UMMETHALA Kavya | 27% | 44% | 23% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 42 | GUPTA Sanya | 1% | 9% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 43 | MA Katelyn | 17% | 36% | 31% | 13% | 3% | - | - |
| 44 | LIN Ashley | 2% | 14% | 36% | 36% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 45 | POON Desiree | 41% | 41% | 15% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 46 | DUONG Zoey | 18% | 39% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 47 | LOUIE Sarah | 24% | 52% | 21% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 48 | SYA Annabelle | 36% | 44% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 48 | WEN Mica | 17% | 37% | 31% | 13% | 3% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.