Denver, CO, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | KHAMIS Yasmine A. | - | - | - | - | 5% | 46% | 49% |
2 | MEHROTRA Anya | - | - | - | - | 5% | 31% | 64% |
3 | TOLSMA Chloe (CJ) | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 36% | 27% | 7% |
3 | SMOTRITSKY Mia | - | - | 2% | 10% | 29% | 39% | 21% |
5 | NGUYEN Tallulah | - | - | - | 2% | 11% | 38% | 49% |
6 | KIM Zoe L. | - | - | - | 2% | 13% | 42% | 43% |
7 | ZHANG Victoria R. | - | - | 1% | 10% | 40% | 50% | |
8 | RANDLEMAN Teresa | - | - | 1% | 11% | 35% | 43% | 9% |
9 | JAKEL Sophia N. | - | - | - | - | 2% | 24% | 74% |
10 | KORFONTA Jolie | - | - | - | 2% | 12% | 40% | 46% |
11 | YU Nicole J. | - | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 38% | 17% |
12 | FENG ge | - | - | 2% | 14% | 37% | 36% | 10% |
13 | YAO Yilin | - | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 32% | 10% |
14 | HAFEEZ Hania | - | - | 2% | 16% | 42% | 40% | |
15 | LUO Ashley | - | - | - | 1% | 11% | 40% | 48% |
16 | NGUYEN Kira | - | - | - | 3% | 16% | 42% | 39% |
17 | SEBASTIAN Felicity A. | - | - | - | 1% | 14% | 44% | 40% |
18 | PEHLIVANI Zara | - | - | - | 4% | 20% | 42% | 34% |
19 | ZHANG Tina Tianyi | - | - | - | 1% | 7% | 34% | 58% |
20 | REMEZA Alissa | - | - | 1% | 6% | 26% | 44% | 24% |
21 | ELSTON Sophia | - | - | 4% | 20% | 39% | 30% | 7% |
22 | WITTER Catherine A. | - | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 44% | 24% |
23 | YAO Melinda | - | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 41% | 23% |
23 | NIX Reagan | - | 7% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 6% | - |
25 | PADHYE Tanishka | - | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 41% | 27% |
26 | LEE REGINA | - | - | - | 4% | 20% | 44% | 32% |
27 | BECKMAN Ana | - | - | 3% | 16% | 36% | 34% | 10% |
28 | DOROSHKEVICH Victoriia | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 38% | 52% |
29 | SPRINGER Sierra | - | - | 1% | 5% | 23% | 43% | 28% |
30 | PINNAMANENI Drithi | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 35% | 16% | 2% |
31 | LIN Elaine | - | - | 3% | 18% | 37% | 32% | 10% |
32 | AZMEH nour | - | - | 3% | 17% | 38% | 33% | 9% |
33 | YANG Alisa | - | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 38% | 16% |
34 | CHA Eugenie | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 39% | 20% | 3% |
35 | KOZLOWSKI Maya M. | - | 4% | 19% | 39% | 31% | 7% | |
36 | MALLAVARPU saanvi | - | 2% | 15% | 36% | 33% | 12% | 1% |
37 | POTAPENKO Margarita D. | - | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 37% | 15% |
38 | NELSON-LOVE Lily B. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 43% | 19% |
39 | GEVA Eliana | 1% | 11% | 32% | 36% | 17% | 3% | - |
39 | LI Fei | - | 3% | 13% | 29% | 34% | 18% | 3% |
41 | SWENSON Nikita G. | - | - | 2% | 13% | 34% | 37% | 13% |
42 | WANG Ziqi (yoyo) | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 36% | 30% | 9% |
43 | CHI Chelsea | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 39% | 21% | 3% |
44 | LAN Alice S. | - | - | - | 4% | 21% | 43% | 31% |
45 | LEE Natasha | - | - | - | 3% | 18% | 42% | 36% |
46 | LIN Ariel | 2% | 19% | 37% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - |
47 | ZIGALO Elizabeth | - | - | - | 2% | 16% | 42% | 40% |
48 | DESAI Meera P. | - | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 42% | 27% |
49 | SHELIN Chelsea | - | 1% | 12% | 32% | 36% | 16% | 2% |
50 | BARG Daniella | - | - | 4% | 20% | 40% | 29% | 6% |
50 | RUNIONS Emersyn | - | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 42% | 25% |
52 | FERREIRA DE MELO Adriana | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 2% |
53 | FURMAN Maria | - | - | 4% | 19% | 39% | 31% | 6% |
54 | GUO Luxi | 1% | 8% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 6% | - |
55 | BORUFF Vincent (Artemis) | 2% | 12% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 4% | |
56 | DAYAL Saahira | 25% | 40% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - | |
57 | LIU Nicole | 1% | 8% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 5% | |
58 | BRUNSON Nile | - | 1% | 9% | 33% | 43% | 14% | |
59 | LU Samantha R. | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 4% |
60 | SENYUVA Su | - | 2% | 15% | 34% | 33% | 13% | 2% |
61 | LEWIS Rachel | 5% | 22% | 37% | 26% | 9% | 1% | - |
62 | KRUMHOLZ Nicole | - | 3% | 17% | 37% | 31% | 11% | 1% |
63 | NEELAM Navya | 9% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
64 | SKILLMAN Natalie | 15% | 39% | 32% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
65 | GUJJA Misha | - | - | 4% | 18% | 39% | 32% | 7% |
66 | CALDERA Lexi I. | - | 1% | 5% | 22% | 42% | 30% | |
67 | ZANGA Kaitlyn | 1% | 8% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
68 | BUSH emma | - | - | 5% | 19% | 37% | 31% | 8% |
69 | CANNING Charlotte | - | - | 2% | 18% | 44% | 30% | 6% |
70 | WONG Alexandra R. | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 38% | 25% | 6% |
71 | CARRIER Meredith | - | 1% | 11% | 33% | 39% | 14% | 1% |
72 | BENZAN India | - | 5% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 9% | 1% |
73 | SYKES Elynor | 3% | 20% | 37% | 29% | 10% | 1% | - |
74 | SMUK Alexandra S. | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 38% | 27% | 5% |
75 | SHU Youshan | 2% | 11% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 4% | |
76 | XIONG Angelica | 1% | 7% | 23% | 36% | 25% | 7% | 1% |
77 | MALLAVARPU Aarthi C. | - | - | - | 6% | 30% | 46% | 18% |
78 | WANG Jessie | - | 5% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 10% | 1% |
79 | MANDAP Svetlanna | - | 7% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 6% | 1% |
80 | REID Anousheh | - | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 41% | 24% |
81 | BEAVER Ava | - | 2% | 12% | 33% | 36% | 15% | 2% |
82 | YOU Emily | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 7% |
83 | CHERNIS Zoe C. | - | - | 5% | 19% | 37% | 31% | 8% |
84 | LEE Rachel | - | 2% | 16% | 35% | 32% | 13% | 2% |
85 | CHOI Grace | - | 2% | 15% | 34% | 32% | 14% | 2% |
86 | KORKIN Alice | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 5% |
87 | MUN Brianna K. | - | - | 5% | 21% | 38% | 29% | 8% |
87 | SHIV Avni | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 37% | 21% | 3% |
89 | MUELLER Emma M. | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 6% |
90 | DOUGLAS Marketa F. | 1% | 8% | 28% | 39% | 21% | 4% | - |
91 | MENDOZA zoie | 1% | 10% | 33% | 37% | 16% | 3% | - |
92 | PARK Avery | 1% | 7% | 27% | 39% | 21% | 4% | - |
93 | KINDEL Amara | 5% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
94 | ZHU Serene M. | - | 5% | 20% | 39% | 29% | 7% | |
95 | ENRILE Erica | 1% | 14% | 38% | 35% | 11% | 1% | |
96 | PHUKAN Indra | - | 4% | 19% | 36% | 29% | 10% | 1% |
97 | YAO KATHARINE | - | 2% | 15% | 37% | 33% | 12% | 1% |
98 | LEE Camilla | - | 4% | 19% | 38% | 29% | 9% | 1% |
99 | KIM Jayna | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 37% | 22% | 4% |
99 | SONG Angela | - | - | 2% | 15% | 38% | 36% | 9% |
99 | VICKERMAN Sofia | 3% | 17% | 35% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - |
102 | PECK Maia A. | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 15% | 3% |
103 | ZHENG Linden | 3% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 3% | - |
104 | REKEDA Anna | 4% | 22% | 41% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - |
105 | SUN Renee R. | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 4% |
105 | CHANG Celine A. | 1% | 7% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 7% | 1% |
107 | LEE Olivia | - | - | 1% | 10% | 35% | 46% | 8% |
107 | WANG Victoria | - | 1% | 16% | 47% | 29% | 6% | - |
109 | CHISHOLM Phoebe C. | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 3% |
110 | DEPOMMIER Isabelle | 2% | 13% | 31% | 33% | 16% | 3% | - |
111 | YOU Isabel B. | 6% | 23% | 36% | 25% | 9% | 1% | - |
112 | JAKEL Alysa C. | 3% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 3% | |
112 | RAKHOVSKI Alexandra | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 37% | 17% | |
114 | RICHARDSON Meredith | 1% | 12% | 36% | 37% | 13% | 1% | |
114 | HUANG Lanlan | 2% | 13% | 33% | 34% | 16% | 2% | |
116 | PRIHODKO Nina | 1% | 12% | 31% | 35% | 18% | 3% | |
117 | CAFASSO Natalya | - | 1% | 11% | 30% | 36% | 18% | 3% |
118 | VICKERMAN Aspen | 7% | 32% | 39% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
119 | NGUYEN Jolie T. | 3% | 17% | 34% | 30% | 13% | 3% | - |
120 | CHIRASHNYA Noya | - | 2% | 10% | 26% | 36% | 22% | 5% |
121 | LEE Yedda | - | 4% | 19% | 35% | 31% | 10% | - |
121 | CHUNG Penelope | 3% | 21% | 42% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - |
123 | HAYDEN Molly | 2% | 24% | 39% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - |
124 | LAI Amanda | 16% | 39% | 32% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
125 | VARAN Kateryna | 15% | 44% | 31% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
126 | SAUCEDO Grecia | 8% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 7% | 1% | - |
127 | CREMONA Viola Maria | 4% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 9% | 1% | |
128 | FERNLUND Helen | 21% | 42% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - | |
129 | KUMAR Eva | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 36% | 19% | 3% |
130 | KOVALCHUK Erika S. | 1% | 12% | 34% | 36% | 15% | 2% | - |
131 | LEEDER Elizabeth | - | 5% | 19% | 36% | 29% | 10% | 1% |
132 | BRIDGE Rebekah | 2% | 13% | 30% | 33% | 17% | 4% | - |
133 | ANDERSON Claire | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 40% | 25% | 4% |
134 | NEELAM Neha | 4% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 10% | 2% | - |
135 | LUMINATI Kathryn | - | 8% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 5% | - |
136 | BALAKRISHNAN Trisha | 5% | 22% | 37% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - |
137 | HSIU Elizabeth | 1% | 11% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 5% | - |
138 | WANG Zoe | 2% | 18% | 38% | 31% | 10% | 1% | - |
139 | BARDIN Kira | 33% | 45% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
140 | NGUYEN Ella | 42% | 40% | 15% | 3% | - | - | |
141 | NGUYEN Ashley L. | 7% | 29% | 40% | 20% | 4% | - | |
142 | KUKVA Taisiya | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 39% | 24% | 5% |
143 | WATTANAKIT Anda | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 35% | 20% | 4% |
144 | LEE Samantha X. | 8% | 34% | 37% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
145 | ZHEREBCHEVSKA Veronika | - | 1% | 10% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 4% |
146 | LENDIS Gabrielle | 3% | 16% | 34% | 32% | 13% | 2% | - |
147 | DRYSDALE Lita | 2% | 15% | 33% | 32% | 15% | 3% | - |
148 | GUAN Isabella | 1% | 10% | 29% | 36% | 19% | 4% | - |
149 | DUONG Zoey | 2% | 15% | 38% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - |
150 | WONG Caitlin | 9% | 31% | 37% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
151 | LIANG Jingjing | 2% | 21% | 40% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - |
152 | POON Desiree | 19% | 44% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
153 | SHARMA Sanvi | - | 4% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 10% | 1% |
154 | XU Celina | 1% | 11% | 54% | 29% | 5% | - | - |
154 | PULLARA Ashley | - | 4% | 18% | 38% | 31% | 8% | - |
156 | CAMAMA Tessa | 1% | 9% | 31% | 37% | 18% | 4% | - |
157 | KIM Isabella | 86% | 14% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
158 | JOHNSON Merit | 16% | 41% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
159 | PATELLI Anna Alice | 49% | 40% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
159 | FREEMAN Kate | 12% | 42% | 34% | 10% | 1% | - | |
161 | PATIL Amulya | 3% | 18% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 2% | |
162 | GUESNARD Maelig | 30% | 41% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
163 | WANG Angelina | 1% | 8% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 6% | - |
163 | TANG Elaine | 20% | 41% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
165 | ILYAS Ayah | 36% | 43% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
166 | BLANCO Ariia | 19% | 40% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
167 | PAN Angela | 30% | 45% | 21% | 4% | - | - | - |
168 | CHIRASHNYA Mika | 8% | 30% | 37% | 20% | 5% | - | - |
169 | JUDICKE Olivia | 6% | 29% | 38% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - |
170 | CHANG Abigail | 26% | 42% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
171 | MESSINA Sophia | 8% | 31% | 38% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
172 | SCANLAN Claire | 30% | 43% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
173 | BROWN Riley | 2% | 20% | 40% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - |
174 | MANAUGH Calliope | 51% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
175 | MAGALSKI Mary | 10% | 32% | 35% | 18% | 5% | - | - |
175 | MARTIN Adriana | 19% | 40% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
177 | ZHUANG Lauren | 14% | 40% | 34% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
178 | HAU Olivia | 2% | 13% | 32% | 33% | 16% | 4% | - |
179 | NELSON Grace E. | 7% | 31% | 40% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
179 | HASIM Eurietta | 33% | 41% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
181 | WALTER Anna | 8% | 32% | 38% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
182 | PARKS Jessica | - | 3% | 14% | 30% | 32% | 17% | 4% |
183 | SANLIKOL Suzan | 26% | 47% | 23% | 4% | - | - | - |
184 | KOH Millicent | 42% | 49% | 8% | - | - | - | - |
185 | STOMMEL-DIAZ Charly | 17% | 39% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
185 | KHAZANCHI Raeha | 82% | 17% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
185 | MISRA Tara | 6% | 27% | 40% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - |
188 | BERNAL Isabella | 7% | 38% | 37% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
189 | ZUCKER Emily A. | 24% | 41% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
190 | UM KIM Hyun Hee Lorena | 57% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
191 | MIHILL Margaret | 23% | 41% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
192 | NWOKOCHA Chizoro | 39% | 43% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
193 | VICKERMAN Lilly | 4% | 43% | 37% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
194 | PYE Emily | 43% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
194 | MITRANI Gabriela | 33% | 46% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
196 | KNUDSEN Ayda Jane | 18% | 40% | 31% | 10% | 1% | - | |
197 | MOLLINIER Angel | 16% | 36% | 32% | 13% | 3% | - | - |
198 | BOGDANOVSKAYA Elizaveta | 32% | 45% | 20% | 3% | - | - | - |
198 | IMRAN Jannat | 10% | 31% | 35% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
200 | GARIKIPATI Thansi | 3% | 20% | 38% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - |
201 | RUVOLO Arwen | 23% | 47% | 25% | 5% | - | - | - |
202 | TSUI Zoe | 51% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
202 | LEEB Zoe | 73% | 25% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
204 | LAKE Emma | 44% | 51% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
204 | ERISKIN Nisa | 39% | 42% | 16% | 3% | - | - | - |
206 | SANTORO Chloe | 70% | 26% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.