Denver, CO, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | WATRALL Christina | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 37% | 54% |
| 2 | KUZNETSOV Victoria | - | - | - | 2% | 13% | 40% | 46% |
| 3 | LUO Ashley | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 42% | 26% | |
| 3 | LEE Sumin | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 39% | 50% |
| 5 | LEE REGINA | - | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 35% | 14% |
| 6 | TOLSMA Chloe (CJ) | - | 1% | 10% | 30% | 37% | 19% | 3% |
| 7 | SMOTRITSKY Mia | - | - | 5% | 19% | 37% | 30% | 8% |
| 8 | SONG Angela | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 35% | 18% | 3% |
| 9 | WANG Elizabeth | - | - | - | - | 3% | 27% | 69% |
| 10 | RUNIONS Emersyn | - | 5% | 21% | 37% | 29% | 7% | |
| 11 | WITTE Vera | - | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 37% | 16% |
| 12 | YANG Alisa | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 5% |
| 13 | FENG ge | - | - | 2% | 12% | 38% | 41% | 7% |
| 14 | YU Nicole J. | - | - | 4% | 16% | 34% | 34% | 13% |
| 15 | LU Junyao | - | - | 5% | 22% | 39% | 27% | 7% |
| 16 | SMUK Daria A. | - | 2% | 15% | 38% | 34% | 9% | 1% |
| 17 | NGUYEN Kira | - | - | 1% | 9% | 31% | 41% | 18% |
| 18 | TYLER Syd | - | - | - | 2% | 13% | 42% | 44% |
| 19 | CAPELLUA Mariasole | - | - | 3% | 14% | 34% | 35% | 13% |
| 20 | MEHROTRA Anya | - | - | - | 4% | 18% | 42% | 36% |
| 21 | KIM Zoe L. | - | - | - | 3% | 18% | 43% | 35% |
| 22 | SEBASTIAN Felicity A. | - | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 42% | 27% |
| 23 | LAN Alice S. | - | - | 3% | 16% | 36% | 33% | 11% |
| 24 | PADHYE Tanishka | - | 2% | 14% | 33% | 37% | 14% | |
| 25 | ZHANG Victoria R. | - | - | 3% | 14% | 36% | 38% | 10% |
| 26 | RUSSELL Renata | - | - | 3% | 13% | 33% | 37% | 14% |
| 26 | BUSH emma | - | 3% | 13% | 30% | 34% | 17% | 3% |
| 28 | DOUGLAS Julia F. | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 5% |
| 29 | DAMRATOSKI Anna Z. | - | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 34% | 12% |
| 30 | ELSTON Sophia | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 3% |
| 31 | PHUKAN Indra | 1% | 7% | 27% | 38% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 32 | LI Fei | 2% | 14% | 36% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 33 | ZHANG Tina Tianyi | - | - | 3% | 18% | 45% | 33% | |
| 34 | LEE Natasha | - | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 39% | 18% |
| 35 | MAO Amy | - | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 43% | 29% |
| 36 | CANNING Charlotte | 1% | 9% | 26% | 35% | 22% | 5% | |
| 37 | CHEN Lefu | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 40% | 43% |
| 38 | KIM Elizabeth Y. | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 37% | 24% | 5% |
| 39 | NELSON-LOVE Lily B. | - | - | 3% | 16% | 37% | 34% | 10% |
| 40 | REMEZA Alissa | - | - | 3% | 16% | 39% | 34% | 7% |
| 40 | SHU Youshan | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 36% | 17% | 3% |
| 42 | PRIHODKO Nina | 2% | 11% | 27% | 33% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
| 43 | KORKIN Alice | 1% | 12% | 31% | 34% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 44 | KIM Jayna | - | 4% | 20% | 39% | 30% | 7% | |
| 45 | TAN Jocelyn | 1% | 9% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 46 | BECKMAN Ana | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 39% | 26% | 5% |
| 47 | CHANG Celine A. | 3% | 18% | 36% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 48 | POTAPENKO Margarita D. | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 6% |
| 49 | SMITH Grace L. | - | - | 1% | 9% | 31% | 41% | 18% |
| 50 | BEI Karen | - | - | - | 3% | 20% | 49% | 27% |
| 51 | GUMAGAY Erika L. | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 40% | 21% | 3% |
| 52 | PAPADAKIS Lily | - | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 38% | 15% |
| 53 | SLACKMAN Valerie | - | 5% | 32% | 39% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 54 | LEE Olive | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 6% |
| 55 | YOU Emily | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 38% | 19% | 3% |
| 56 | RANDLEMAN Teresa | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 37% | 16% | 2% |
| 57 | LEANG Priscilla Y. | - | - | 5% | 23% | 39% | 27% | 5% |
| 58 | SWENSON Nikita G. | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 37% | 27% | 7% |
| 59 | ZHEREBCHEVSKA Veronika | 4% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 10% | 1% | |
| 60 | PINNAMANENI Drithi | 4% | 26% | 41% | 24% | 5% | - | |
| 61 | LEE Olivia | - | 1% | 10% | 30% | 37% | 18% | 3% |
| 62 | NGUYEN Audrey | - | 2% | 15% | 35% | 33% | 13% | 1% |
| 63 | MCLANE Lauren | - | < 1% | 4% | 18% | 42% | 36% | |
| 64 | DOROSHKEVICH Victoriia | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 41% | 22% | |
| 65 | WANG Karen | - | - | - | 1% | 7% | 33% | 59% |
| 66 | PATURU Meghana | - | - | - | 1% | 13% | 45% | 40% |
| 67 | ZIGALO Elizabeth | - | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 41% | 20% |
| 68 | LIN Elaine | - | 6% | 23% | 38% | 27% | 7% | |
| 69 | REID Sobia | - | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 41% | 20% |
| 69 | JAKEL Sophia N. | - | - | - | 1% | 6% | 31% | 62% |
| 71 | EDWARDS Auprell | - | 3% | 17% | 35% | 31% | 12% | 2% |
| 72 | KALE Anika A. | - | - | 2% | 11% | 33% | 40% | 15% |
| 73 | KORFONTA Jolie | - | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 42% | 31% |
| 74 | DESAI Meera P. | - | - | 5% | 21% | 38% | 29% | 7% |
| 74 | MUELLER Emma M. | - | 2% | 14% | 34% | 35% | 14% | 1% |
| 76 | CHISHOLM Phoebe C. | - | 5% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
| 77 | WEISS Talia L. | - | - | 2% | 9% | 28% | 40% | 21% |
| 78 | CAFASSO Natalya | - | 4% | 19% | 35% | 30% | 11% | 1% |
| 79 | MCCUTCHEN Lauren (Lulu) | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 38% | 19% | |
| 80 | ALEXANDROV Katherine S. | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 37% | 15% | |
| 81 | REID Anousheh | - | 5% | 21% | 37% | 29% | 8% | |
| 82 | WITTER Catherine A. | - | - | 2% | 14% | 36% | 36% | 12% |
| 82 | SPRINGER Sierra | - | 1% | 13% | 34% | 34% | 15% | 2% |
| 84 | SUN Renee R. | - | 4% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 12% | 2% |
| 84 | YAO Melinda | - | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 35% | 13% |
| 86 | GEBALA Natalie Brooke A. | - | - | 2% | 15% | 35% | 36% | 12% |
| 87 | JAKEL Alysa C. | - | 5% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
| 88 | BARG Daniella | - | 4% | 18% | 37% | 30% | 10% | 1% |
| 88 | STOECKEL Sofia I. | 2% | 14% | 31% | 33% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 88 | RAKHOVSKI Alexandra | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 6% |
| 91 | NEISINGH Isabelle | 1% | 11% | 30% | 35% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 92 | LIANG Jingjing | 3% | 21% | 40% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 93 | MALLAVARPU Aarthi C. | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 5% |
| 93 | ZHU Serene M. | - | 3% | 16% | 33% | 32% | 13% | 2% |
| 95 | SYKES Elynor | 1% | 11% | 33% | 36% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 96 | LEE Samantha X. | 13% | 35% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 97 | HICKS Grace | 3% | 17% | 32% | 30% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 98 | HOPKINS Leila | 3% | 20% | 37% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 99 | WHITTEMORE Lucy K. | - | - | 3% | 12% | 31% | 38% | 17% |
| 100 | SHELIN Chelsea | 4% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 10% | 1% | |
| 101 | LEUNG Natalie | - | - | 4% | 22% | 47% | 26% | |
| 102 | HUANG Lanlan | - | 12% | 36% | 35% | 14% | 2% | |
| 103 | HAFEEZ Hania | - | - | 5% | 21% | 43% | 31% | |
| 103 | GUJJA Misha | 1% | 10% | 28% | 36% | 20% | 4% | |
| 105 | CHERNIS Zoe C. | 2% | 13% | 33% | 34% | 15% | 2% | |
| 106 | CHA Eugenie | 1% | 9% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
| 107 | PEHLIVANI Zara | - | - | 4% | 16% | 34% | 34% | 12% |
| 108 | CHI Chelsea | - | 6% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
| 109 | KWON Athina | - | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 43% | 28% |
| 110 | NGUYEN Tallulah | - | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 40% | 21% |
| 110 | WANG Angelina | 2% | 21% | 42% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 112 | MILEWSKI Nicole | - | - | 3% | 16% | 36% | 34% | 11% |
| 112 | GUAN Isabella | 3% | 26% | 40% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 114 | FURMAN Maria | - | 4% | 18% | 34% | 29% | 12% | 2% |
| 115 | MENDOZA zoie | 7% | 31% | 39% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 116 | BOYS Nishta B. | - | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 40% | 20% |
| 117 | CHOI Grace | - | 4% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 12% | 2% |
| 118 | LIU Christina A. | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 44% | 36% |
| 119 | YOU Isabel B. | 1% | 13% | 35% | 36% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 120 | DOUGLAS Marketa F. | 3% | 18% | 36% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 121 | CARRIER Meredith | - | 5% | 26% | 39% | 24% | 6% | - |
| 122 | YAO Yilin | 2% | 14% | 33% | 34% | 15% | 2% | |
| 123 | LEE Rachel | 2% | 15% | 32% | 33% | 15% | 3% | |
| 124 | WONG Alexandra R. | - | 5% | 24% | 39% | 26% | 5% | |
| 125 | BRIDGE Rebekah | 6% | 41% | 38% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 126 | KOZLOWSKI Maya M. | - | 4% | 22% | 41% | 27% | 5% | - |
| 127 | BENZAN India | 4% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 127 | DEPOMMIER Isabelle | 5% | 27% | 40% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 129 | GAO Judy | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 39% | 22% | 3% |
| 130 | TEMIRYAEV Anna M. | - | - | 1% | 10% | 31% | 39% | 18% |
| 131 | KENT Elizabeth J. | 4% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 8% | 1% | |
| 132 | CHIRASHNYA Noya | 4% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 9% | 1% | |
| 133 | PATIL Amulya | 3% | 23% | 41% | 27% | 6% | - | |
| 134 | LENDIS Gabrielle | 22% | 40% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 135 | MUN Brianna K. | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 35% | 16% | 2% |
| 136 | XIONG Angelica | 1% | 12% | 33% | 34% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 137 | LU Samantha R. | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 32% | 12% | 2% |
| 138 | WANG Nora | - | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 44% | 16% |
| 138 | YAO KATHARINE | 1% | 21% | 39% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 140 | WADE-CURRIE Ava S. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 41% | 24% |
| 141 | SMUK Alexandra S. | - | 3% | 19% | 37% | 29% | 10% | 1% |
| 142 | SHIV Avni | - | 4% | 19% | 35% | 30% | 11% | 1% |
| 142 | KUKVA Taisiya | 1% | 7% | 25% | 39% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 144 | PEARSON Heila | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 30% | 13% | 2% |
| 145 | ZHENG Linden | 1% | 13% | 36% | 34% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 146 | BASRALIAN Azniv | 2% | 14% | 33% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 147 | NGUYEN Jolie T. | 4% | 29% | 39% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 148 | ZANGA Kaitlyn | 1% | 11% | 35% | 36% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 148 | MANAUGH Calliope | 53% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 150 | SKILLMAN Natalie | 22% | 45% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 151 | SENYUVA Su | 1% | 9% | 27% | 36% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 152 | CALDERA Lexi I. | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 39% | 17% | |
| 153 | RUSSELL Alison | 1% | 26% | 41% | 25% | 6% | 1% | |
| 154 | POPA Catherine | 8% | 30% | 37% | 20% | 5% | - | |
| 155 | PECK Maia A. | 2% | 16% | 38% | 33% | 10% | 1% | |
| 156 | DRYSDALE Lita | 16% | 36% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - | |
| 157 | SHARMA Sanvi | 1% | 10% | 29% | 36% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 158 | VICKERMAN Sofia | 19% | 39% | 30% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 159 | DOERR Zoe | 2% | 14% | 32% | 32% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 159 | HESS Heidi J. | - | 4% | 17% | 33% | 31% | 13% | 2% |
| 161 | GITHENS Gracyn J. | - | 1% | 10% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 4% |
| 162 | ANDERSON Claire | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 43% | 21% | 2% |
| 163 | LEE Yedda | - | 2% | 16% | 36% | 33% | 12% | 1% |
| 163 | SAINT-PHARD Shana | 6% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 165 | TAYLOR-CASAMAYOR Maia | - | 3% | 17% | 35% | 31% | 12% | 2% |
| 166 | ABRAMSON Mariela R. | 2% | 12% | 31% | 34% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 167 | KUMAR Eva | 2% | 14% | 34% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 168 | NELSON Grace E. | 10% | 39% | 36% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 168 | MANDAP Svetlanna | 1% | 13% | 35% | 35% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 170 | WONG Caitlin | 37% | 43% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 171 | RICHARDSON Meredith | 4% | 24% | 39% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 171 | LI Charlotte | 3% | 26% | 40% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 171 | GAUR Ishi | 2% | 12% | 31% | 35% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 174 | LAI Amanda | 32% | 43% | 20% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 175 | LEUNG Wan Kiu Hayley | - | 3% | 16% | 34% | 32% | 13% | 2% |
| 176 | BARON Sabina | - | 3% | 20% | 37% | 29% | 10% | 1% |
| 176 | ERISKIN Nisa | 63% | 31% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
| 178 | LEEDER Elizabeth | 3% | 17% | 34% | 30% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 179 | HSIU Elizabeth | 2% | 16% | 35% | 32% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 180 | ULRICH Zoe | 64% | 30% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
| 181 | DUONG Zoey | 10% | 35% | 35% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
| 182 | LEWIS Rachel | 9% | 35% | 36% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
| 183 | HASIM Eurietta | 42% | 45% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 184 | GUESNARD Maelig | 30% | 46% | 20% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 185 | NIX Reagan | 9% | 34% | 37% | 17% | 3% | - | |
| 186 | KRUMHOLZ Nicole | 7% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 7% | 1% | |
| 187 | DU Shunyi(Wendy) | 6% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 7% | 1% | |
| 188 | LIU Nicole | 3% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 3% | |
| 189 | CHUNG Penelope | 41% | 41% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
| 190 | BEAVER Ava | 5% | 24% | 37% | 26% | 8% | 1% | |
| 191 | LANE Leah | 35% | 42% | 19% | 4% | - | - | |
| 192 | LEEB Zoe | 88% | 11% | - | - | - | - | |
| 193 | PANT Anisha | 1% | 8% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
| 194 | ENRILE Erica | 8% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 195 | DAYAL Saahira | 9% | 35% | 37% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 196 | MOON Seojung | - | 5% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 10% | 1% |
| 197 | PULLARA Ashley | 9% | 28% | 34% | 21% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 198 | DAVIS Julia | 2% | 25% | 41% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 199 | ZUCKER Emily A. | 33% | 45% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 199 | STOMMEL-DIAZ Charly | 8% | 34% | 38% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 201 | VICKERMAN Lilly | 27% | 55% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 202 | SANTOS Cara | 53% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 203 | SAUCEDO Grecia | 22% | 41% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 204 | TANG Elaine | 32% | 45% | 19% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 204 | GARIKIPATI Thansi | 13% | 48% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 206 | FERNLUND Helen | 18% | 44% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 207 | XU Priscilla | 55% | 40% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
| 208 | CHIRASHNYA Mika | 27% | 46% | 22% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 209 | NGUYEN Ashley L. | 15% | 41% | 31% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 210 | POON Desiree | 28% | 50% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 211 | BROWN Riley | 34% | 41% | 19% | 4% | 1% | - | - |
| 212 | MAGALSKI Mary | 13% | 36% | 34% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 213 | SCHMELZER Elizabeth | 14% | 36% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 214 | VICKERMAN Aspen | 24% | 42% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 215 | XU Celina | 60% | 33% | 6% | - | - | - | |
| 216 | HAU Olivia | 6% | 36% | 40% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
| 217 | SHELTON Devyn | 65% | 30% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
| 217 | VARAN Kateryna | 49% | 39% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 219 | NEELAM Neha | 28% | 42% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 220 | PYE Emily | 46% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 220 | LUMINATI Kathryn | 7% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 220 | NWOKOCHA Chizoro | 62% | 33% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
| 223 | MOHAMED Faisa | 7% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 223 | CHANG Abigail | 41% | 42% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 223 | MARTIN Adriana | 44% | 40% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 223 | MISRA Tara | 20% | 42% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 227 | LEVERETT Corrina | 51% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 227 | IMRAN Jannat | 77% | 21% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
| 229 | MANCELL Hope | 39% | 43% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 229 | DIAMANDAKIS Alexandra | 17% | 42% | 31% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 229 | FAKTOR Emily | 80% | 19% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.