William & Mary Adair Gym - Williamsburg, VA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | PETERS Nathan M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 28% |
| 2 | GALEMORE Jonathan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 29% |
| 3 | MCKINNEY Isaiah | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 51% | 13% |
| 3 | MOORHOUSE Emmett | 100% | 99% | 87% | 55% | 20% | 3% | - |
| 5 | KLYCZEK Andrew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 28% |
| 6 | EDRALIN II Chadwick Q. | 100% | 98% | 81% | 46% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 7 | EDRALIN Alexander Jordan Q. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 27% | 4% |
| 8 | FORMY DUVAL Christopher | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 31% | 5% |
| 9 | SIDES Nathaniel S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 44% |
| 10 | FADL Omar | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 63% | 17% |
| 11 | O'DONNELL Breck | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 53% |
| 12 | SEMP Iain | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 29% | 3% |
| 13 | LEE Ethan | 100% | 96% | 74% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 14 | SEMP Brannon A. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 73% | 32% | 6% | - |
| 15 | REEDER Nicholas W. | 100% | 97% | 79% | 38% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 16 | KUYLER Karl | 100% | 89% | 48% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 17 | OTT James (Jimmy) P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 44% | 10% |
| 18 | MAGGY Melanie D. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 27% | 5% | - |
| 19 | SMIGRODZKI Nymeria | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 46% | 8% |
| 20 | HAYES Nathan P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 47% | 9% |
| 21 | SLACK Mary-Stuart F. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 20% | 3% |
| 22 | PRICE Owen | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 30% | 6% | - |
| 23 | HARTMAN Grayson | 100% | 99% | 81% | 42% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 24 | FERGUSON Sam C. | 100% | 98% | 77% | 39% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 25 | TREADWAY Ella | 100% | 62% | 18% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 26 | WILLIAMS IV Walter | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 48% | 14% | 2% |
| 27 | LEE Hans | 100% | 47% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 28 | KASPER Lucia | 100% | 65% | 24% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 29 | MAHNKEN Thomas G. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 44% | 12% | 1% |
| 30 | RYAN Sean | 100% | 90% | 55% | 17% | 2% | - | - |
| 31 | MORRIS Luke | 100% | 96% | 74% | 31% | 4% | - | - |
| 32 | DELANNES-MOLKA Daniel | 100% | 74% | 27% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 33 | ROUNTREE Andrew | 100% | 66% | 20% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 34 | MALIK Zeerick | 100% | 40% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
| 35 | WILLIAMS Morgan | 100% | 94% | 62% | 23% | 4% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.