William & Mary Adair Gym - Williamsburg, VA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | SOUDERS Peter F. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| 2 | WOODWARD Connor | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 45% |
| 3 | FENG Leo | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 40% |
| 3 | SU Landon | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 51% | |
| 5 | CHAVES Matthew J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 41% | |
| 6 | DECK Tyson | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 39% | - |
| 7 | QI JI | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 56% | 15% | |
| 8 | FENKER William M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 92% | 45% | |
| 9 | LIAO Siwen | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 57% | |
| 10 | SEMP Brannon A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 33% | 6% |
| 11 | CLARK Keagan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 90% | 53% | 12% | |
| 12 | LE Tan | 100% | 100% | 94% | 73% | 37% | 10% | 1% |
| 13 | OTT Alexander | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 33% | 7% | - |
| 14 | STAM August M. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 66% | 21% | 2% | |
| 15 | CASSIDY Connor J. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 38% | 6% | - | |
| 16 | ABU-AJAJ Mohamed | 100% | 94% | 71% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 17 | LEE Matthew | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 24% | 3% | - |
| 18 | DREHER Matthew | 100% | 96% | 75% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 19 | PETERS Nathan M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 26% | 4% |
| 20 | MITCHELL Matthew | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 45% | 13% | 1% |
| 21 | LAUDO Joseph | 100% | 100% | 97% | 77% | 31% | 2% | |
| 22 | SHIFFLETT Parker | 100% | 98% | 82% | 41% | 6% | - | |
| 23 | TRAYNOR Jake | 100% | 93% | 64% | 21% | 1% | - | |
| 24 | ROUADY Ryan | 100% | 99% | 81% | 35% | 5% | - | |
| 25 | SUTHERLAND Jr. Richard L. | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 37% | 9% | - |
| 26 | BUNCHER Michael | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 49% | 16% | 2% |
| 27 | PARCELL Colby | 100% | 87% | 53% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
| 28 | ZANE Christopher | 100% | 65% | 21% | 3% | - | - | |
| 29 | PHAM Matthew | 100% | 86% | 41% | 8% | - | - | |
| 30 | BARR Corinne | 100% | 52% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
| 31 | REED Michael | 100% | 93% | 58% | 20% | 3% | - | - |
| 32 | JACKSON Evan | 100% | 37% | 6% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 33 | LESTYAN Cat | 100% | 57% | 15% | 1% | - | - | |
| 34 | URIBE David | 100% | 95% | 73% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 35 | KEESEE Devon | 100% | 82% | 32% | 5% | - | - | |
| 35 | WILLIAMS Morgan | 100% | 72% | 18% | 2% | - | - | |
| 37 | MARINO Edwin | 100% | 96% | 66% | 20% | 2% | - | - |
| 38 | OHASHI Jax | 100% | 96% | 75% | 39% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 39 | WANG Kelley | 100% | 77% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.