Event Results
Central Collegiate Fencing Conference ChampionshipsDifficulty Map
Each box shows how difficult an opponent was from the fencer's point of view.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | TOLEDO AMES Julieta Isabel | V V V V V V V V D V V | V V V | 10.3 | 10 | -0.3 |
| 2 | HOOGENDOORN Levi | D V V V V D V V V D | V V D | 6.3 | 7 | +0.7 |
| 3 | NGUYEN Thea | V V D V V D V D V V V V | V D | 9.1 | 9 | -0.1 |
| 3 | OISHI Megumi | V D V V D V V V V V | V D | 7.9 | 8 | +0.1 |
| 5 | MILLER Sky | V V V V D V D V V V V | D | 9.2 | 9 | -0.2 |
| 6 | LIU Sumin | D V V V D V D V V V V | D | 4.6 | 8 | +3.4 |
| 7 | SATHYANATH Kailing | V V V D V D V V D | D | 6.0 | 6 | - |
| 8 | PERRIER Eleonore | V V D V V V V V D D D | D | 7.9 | 7 | -0.9 |
| 9 | UDOH Tessy | D D D D V D D D D V | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 | |
| 10 | FREIBURGER Ilyssa M. | V V D D D V D D D V V D | 4.9 | 5 | +0.1 | |
| 11 | BROWN Delaney | V D V D D V D D D D D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 | |
| 12 | ARNIPALLI Hamsika | D D V V V D D D D D D | 4.8 | 3 | -1.8 | |
| 13 | SHAY-TANNAS Zoe Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 14 | ISBERG Natalie | D V D V D D D D D D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 | |
| 15 | HORMEL Molly | V D D D | 0.2 | 1 | +0.8 | |
| 16 | MANTOAN Adeline L. | D D D D D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 | |
| 17 | BYARS Reagan | D D D D V D | 0.7 | 1 | +0.3 | |
| 18 | LARIMER Katherine E. | D D V D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 | |
| 19 | PASSALARIS Joanna M. | D D D D D D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 | |
| 20 | BENFORD Hannah Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 21 | MOLINA Adriana Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| 22 | OLESEN Claire Missing ID | 0.0 | 0 | - | ||
| Color | Difficulty | Win Probability |
|---|---|---|
| Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Very Easy | 80% to 100% |