French Field House - Columbus, OH, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | ||
1 | TOLEDO AMES Julieta Isabel | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 2% | 13% | 39% | 46% | |
2 | HOOGENDOORN Levi | - | - | - | 1% | 5% | 17% | 33% | 30% | 13% | 2% | - | ||
3 | NGUYEN Thea | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1% | 7% | 21% | 34% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
3 | OISHI Megumi | - | - | - | - | - | 2% | 9% | 24% | 35% | 24% | 6% | ||
5 | MILLER Sky | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1% | 5% | 18% | 33% | 31% | 12% | |
6 | LIU Sumin | - | - | 4% | 15% | 29% | 30% | 16% | 5% | 1% | - | - | - | |
7 | SATHYANATH Kailing | - | - | - | 2% | 8% | 23% | 34% | 25% | 7% | 1% | |||
8 | PERRIER Eleonore | - | - | - | - | - | 2% | 10% | 25% | 32% | 22% | 8% | 1% | |
9 | UDOH Tessy | 4% | 22% | 39% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - | - | - | ||
10 | FREIBURGER Ilyssa M. | - | - | 3% | 11% | 24% | 30% | 21% | 9% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
11 | BROWN Delaney | 5% | 28% | 38% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
12 | ARNIPALLI Hamsika | - | - | 2% | 11% | 26% | 32% | 21% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - | |
14 | ISBERG Natalie | 1% | 13% | 33% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - | - | - | - | - | ||
15 | HORMEL Molly | 80% | 19% | 1% | - | - | ||||||||
16 | MANTOAN Adeline L. | 60% | 35% | 5% | - | - | - | |||||||
17 | BYARS Reagan | 46% | 44% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - | ||||||
18 | LARIMER Katherine E. | 1% | 24% | 53% | 21% | 2% | ||||||||
19 | PASSALARIS Joanna M. | 30% | 52% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.