Fort Worth, TX, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | WANG JiaQi | - | - | 3% | 12% | 29% | 37% | 19% |
2 | LONG Jessie | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 4% |
3 | ZHANG Ashley | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 7% |
3 | GONG Joy | - | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 41% | 27% |
5 | ZHANG Olivia | - | 4% | 17% | 35% | 32% | 11% | |
6 | HU Heidi | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 7% |
7 | NEMORIN Rei | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 35% | 30% | 9% |
8 | ZHAO Lingran | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 35% | 54% |
9 | ZHU Avril | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 5% |
10 | SUNG Olivia | 2% | 12% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 4% | - |
11 | YAN Angela | - | 3% | 12% | 30% | 36% | 18% | 1% |
12 | LONG Chloe | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 37% | 19% | |
13 | CHOI Charlotte | - | 5% | 20% | 36% | 30% | 9% | |
14 | REN Katherine | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 37% | 27% | 6% |
15 | XU Elaine | 9% | 33% | 36% | 17% | 4% | 1% | - |
16 | FAN Tina | 3% | 18% | 35% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - |
17 | LI Tiffany | - | 3% | 17% | 36% | 32% | 10% | 1% |
18 | CAI Joanna | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 35% | 30% | 9% |
19 | OSMINKINA-JONES Kai | 4% | 22% | 39% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - |
20 | KIM Grace | 4% | 19% | 33% | 28% | 12% | 3% | - |
21 | NGUYEN Summer | - | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 44% | 25% |
22 | CHENG Anna | 2% | 13% | 32% | 34% | 16% | 3% | |
23 | JIANG Evelyn | - | 3% | 15% | 32% | 33% | 15% | 2% |
24 | YE Isabella | - | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 42% | 28% |
25 | CHANG Kylie | - | 2% | 12% | 29% | 34% | 18% | 4% |
26 | KATZ Emma | - | 2% | 12% | 33% | 35% | 15% | 2% |
27 | WANG Emily | 2% | 17% | 35% | 31% | 13% | 2% | |
27 | TA-ZHOU Sophia | 6% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 7% | 1% | |
29 | WANG Tina | - | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 42% | 21% |
30 | YU Stella | 3% | 18% | 34% | 29% | 12% | 3% | - |
31 | CHENG Zijuan "Grace" | 1% | 9% | 33% | 37% | 17% | 3% | - |
32 | SCHMIDT Yehna | - | 4% | 16% | 31% | 32% | 15% | 3% |
33 | LAUREYNS Ainsley | - | - | 3% | 13% | 31% | 36% | 16% |
34 | KO Ariel | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 4% |
34 | MCCARTHY Nora Louisa Abrous | 13% | 32% | 33% | 17% | 5% | 1% | - |
36 | QIU Abigail | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 37% | 20% | 4% |
37 | BEATEY Piper | 12% | 32% | 34% | 18% | 4% | - | |
37 | YU Skylar | 1% | 12% | 32% | 35% | 17% | 3% | |
39 | ESTEVES ZOE | 2% | 11% | 28% | 35% | 20% | 4% | |
40 | DUDNICK Caitlin | 3% | 17% | 32% | 30% | 14% | 3% | - |
41 | LAI Karen | - | 4% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 11% | 1% |
42 | KIM Saeren | 5% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 11% | 2% | - |
43 | MERRITT Annabelle | 2% | 15% | 33% | 32% | 15% | 3% | - |
44 | WEI Levana | 11% | 35% | 36% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
45 | CONG Catherine | 1% | 8% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 6% | |
46 | DEMRY Kylee | 26% | 43% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
47 | BRIMMER Bella | 36% | 43% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
48 | KANIA Brigitte | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 6% |
49 | GUO YUKI | 9% | 32% | 38% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
50 | HWANG Sophie | 1% | 9% | 25% | 35% | 23% | 6% | - |
51 | WANG April | 14% | 38% | 33% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
52 | WANG Keira | 1% | 10% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
53 | RUSMEVICHIENTONG Lyla | 4% | 17% | 32% | 30% | 14% | 3% | - |
54 | CHACKO Anne | 36% | 42% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
55 | HAYHOE Tara | 5% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 11% | 2% | - |
56 | LEE Chaewon | 55% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
56 | CLAIANU Adriana | 1% | 17% | 41% | 31% | 9% | 1% | |
58 | BABB Virginia | 14% | 41% | 32% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
59 | BRAN ROSADO Victoria | 47% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - | - | - |
59 | GU Lauranna | 2% | 15% | 34% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - |
61 | LIU Anya | 33% | 43% | 19% | 4% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.