Fort Worth, TX, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | DHAIYA Tanya | 5% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 1% | |
| 2 | ALLIEVI Simone | 1% | 9% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 3 | ZHONG Evelyn | 2% | 14% | 31% | 33% | 17% | 3% | |
| 3 | OPERARIO Sofia Francesca | - | - | 3% | 17% | 39% | 34% | 8% |
| 5 | HABEK Sophia | - | - | - | - | 2% | 19% | 79% |
| 6 | RAMEY Alexa | 1% | 6% | 22% | 36% | 28% | 8% | |
| 7 | CHEN Alina | - | - | 4% | 17% | 35% | 33% | 11% |
| 8 | WU Jessica | - | - | - | 3% | 16% | 42% | 39% |
| 9 | XU Chenyu | - | - | 4% | 19% | 42% | 35% | |
| 10 | CAYETANO Audrey | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 41% | 22% | |
| 11 | OLUYOLE Isabella | - | 3% | 18% | 37% | 32% | 10% | |
| 12 | NGUYEN Renee | - | 3% | 20% | 37% | 29% | 10% | 1% |
| 13 | YU Chloe | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 40% | 25% | 2% |
| 14 | JIANG chenxi | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 34% | 13% | 1% |
| 15 | GRIGORYAN Amaliya | 1% | 9% | 27% | 36% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
| 16 | SUN Milly | 11% | 31% | 34% | 19% | 5% | 1% | |
| 17 | CHEN Julia Z. | - | - | 2% | 11% | 33% | 40% | 13% |
| 18 | CARCELLER Bernardita | - | 1% | 7% | 20% | 33% | 28% | 10% |
| 19 | PEI Claire | - | - | 6% | 22% | 37% | 28% | 8% |
| 20 | ANDRUS Allie | 1% | 9% | 23% | 32% | 24% | 10% | 2% |
| 21 | HALE Reagan | - | 2% | 14% | 36% | 36% | 12% | |
| 21 | ADYANTHAYA Anika | - | 3% | 14% | 35% | 37% | 12% | |
| 23 | FU Shannon | 2% | 11% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 4% | |
| 24 | HARMON Nikkole | 1% | 8% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 7% | |
| 25 | LEE Kate | 2% | 11% | 26% | 32% | 22% | 8% | 1% |
| 26 | YAN Ximei (Alicia) | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 32% | 12% | 1% |
| 26 | HE Anna | - | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 40% | 22% |
| 28 | KANE Alexa | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 39% | 21% | |
| 29 | CHU Anabelle | - | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 37% | 14% |
| 30 | LI Ariel | 10% | 31% | 36% | 19% | 5% | - | - |
| 31 | MOKRETSOV Leah | 5% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 7% | 1% | |
| 32 | LI Anna | 2% | 14% | 31% | 33% | 17% | 3% | |
| 33 | MIYOSHI Kylie | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 5% |
| 34 | ZHANG Jane | 1% | 8% | 24% | 35% | 24% | 7% | |
| 35 | OLELE Ifechi | 23% | 40% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 36 | CHEN Stephanie | 4% | 19% | 36% | 30% | 10% | 1% | |
| 37 | YU Xintong | 4% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 12% | 2% | |
| 38 | MIAO Anthea | 6% | 22% | 33% | 25% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 39 | VIJAY Vaishnavi | - | 5% | 19% | 35% | 30% | 10% | |
| 40 | SHABASHOVA Veronika | 13% | 35% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - | |
| 41 | WANG Nicole | - | 3% | 19% | 36% | 29% | 11% | 1% |
| 42 | LI Allison | 1% | 10% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 43 | BUNCH Helena | 24% | 41% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 44 | CHEN Madeline | 3% | 17% | 35% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 45 | LOO Samantha | 19% | 39% | 30% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 46 | DU Chelsea | 1% | 6% | 18% | 31% | 28% | 14% | 3% |
| 47 | FRANGER Emma | 1% | 10% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 48 | MAI Blair | 25% | 43% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 49 | ARULKUMAR Lashia | 3% | 17% | 37% | 31% | 11% | 1% | |
| 50 | DU Chloe | 3% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 13% | 2% | |
| 51 | MOSHKOV Sophia | 19% | 40% | 29% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 52 | BURKS Madison | 19% | 38% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - | |
| 53 | VEGA-BRANDT Gabriella | 5% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 2% | |
| 54 | YOUSSEF Margaret | 1% | 5% | 20% | 34% | 30% | 10% | |
| 55 | YANG Angela | 24% | 43% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 56 | CHOI Arianna | 3% | 13% | 28% | 31% | 19% | 6% | 1% |
| 57 | REN Ivanka | 2% | 12% | 27% | 31% | 20% | 7% | 1% |
| 58 | MISHIMA Olivia | 13% | 36% | 34% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 59 | LEE Zoe | 52% | 39% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 60 | THOMPSON Rhyleigh | 23% | 43% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 61 | KAMALDEV Anya | 2% | 15% | 33% | 32% | 15% | 2% | |
| 62 | KOU Cynthia | 5% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 8% | 1% | |
| 63 | HE Elsa | 22% | 54% | 21% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 64 | LIN Gianna | 6% | 26% | 37% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 65 | MARTIN-HARVEY Connelly | 18% | 42% | 30% | 9% | 1% | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.