Fort Worth, TX, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | DHAIYA Tanya | 100% | 95% | 73% | 37% | 10% | 1% | |
2 | ALLIEVI Simone | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 25% | 5% | - |
3 | ZHONG Evelyn | 100% | 98% | 84% | 53% | 21% | 3% | |
3 | OPERARIO Sofia Francesca | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 41% | 8% |
5 | HABEK Sophia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 79% |
6 | RAMEY Alexa | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 36% | 8% | |
7 | CHEN Alina | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 44% | 11% |
8 | WU Jessica | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 39% |
9 | XU Chenyu | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 35% | |
10 | CAYETANO Audrey | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 22% | |
11 | OLUYOLE Isabella | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 42% | 10% | |
12 | NGUYEN Renee | 100% | 100% | 97% | 77% | 40% | 11% | 1% |
13 | YU Chloe | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 27% | 2% |
14 | JIANG chenxi | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 14% | 1% |
15 | GRIGORYAN Amaliya | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 27% | 6% | 1% |
16 | SUN Milly | 100% | 89% | 58% | 24% | 5% | 1% | |
17 | CHEN Julia Z. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 54% | 13% |
18 | CARCELLER Bernardita | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 71% | 38% | 10% |
19 | PEI Claire | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 35% | 8% |
20 | ANDRUS Allie | 100% | 99% | 90% | 67% | 35% | 11% | 2% |
21 | HALE Reagan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 48% | 12% | |
21 | ADYANTHAYA Anika | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 49% | 12% | |
23 | FU Shannon | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 24% | 4% | |
24 | HARMON Nikkole | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 32% | 7% | |
25 | LEE Kate | 100% | 98% | 88% | 62% | 30% | 9% | 1% |
26 | YAN Ximei (Alicia) | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 45% | 13% | 1% |
26 | HE Anna | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 22% |
28 | KANE Alexa | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 59% | 21% | |
29 | CHU Anabelle | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 14% |
30 | LI Ariel | 100% | 90% | 60% | 24% | 5% | - | - |
31 | MOKRETSOV Leah | 100% | 95% | 73% | 34% | 8% | 1% | |
32 | LI Anna | 100% | 98% | 84% | 53% | 20% | 3% | |
33 | MIYOSHI Kylie | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 29% | 5% |
34 | ZHANG Jane | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 31% | 7% | |
35 | OLELE Ifechi | 100% | 77% | 38% | 10% | 2% | - | |
36 | CHEN Stephanie | 100% | 96% | 77% | 41% | 11% | 1% | |
37 | YU Xintong | 100% | 96% | 77% | 43% | 14% | 2% | |
38 | MIAO Anthea | 100% | 94% | 71% | 39% | 13% | 3% | - |
39 | VIJAY Vaishnavi | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 40% | 10% | |
40 | SHABASHOVA Veronika | 100% | 87% | 52% | 17% | 3% | - | |
41 | WANG Nicole | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 41% | 12% | 1% |
42 | LI Allison | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 26% | 5% | - |
43 | BUNCH Helena | 100% | 76% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
44 | CHEN Madeline | 100% | 97% | 80% | 46% | 15% | 2% | - |
45 | LOO Samantha | 100% | 81% | 42% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
46 | DU Chelsea | 100% | 99% | 93% | 75% | 44% | 16% | 3% |
47 | FRANGER Emma | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 25% | 5% | - |
48 | MAI Blair | 100% | 75% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - | |
49 | ARULKUMAR Lashia | 100% | 97% | 80% | 43% | 12% | 1% | |
50 | DU Chloe | 100% | 97% | 79% | 45% | 15% | 2% | |
51 | MOSHKOV Sophia | 100% | 81% | 41% | 11% | 1% | - | |
52 | BURKS Madison | 100% | 81% | 43% | 14% | 2% | - | |
53 | VEGA-BRANDT Gabriella | 100% | 95% | 74% | 39% | 12% | 2% | |
54 | YOUSSEF Margaret | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 40% | 10% | |
55 | YANG Angela | 100% | 76% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
56 | CHOI Arianna | 100% | 97% | 84% | 56% | 25% | 7% | 1% |
57 | REN Ivanka | 100% | 98% | 86% | 59% | 27% | 7% | 1% |
58 | MISHIMA Olivia | 100% | 87% | 51% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
59 | LEE Zoe | 100% | 48% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
60 | THOMPSON Rhyleigh | 100% | 77% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
61 | KAMALDEV Anya | 100% | 98% | 82% | 50% | 17% | 2% | |
62 | KOU Cynthia | 100% | 95% | 71% | 35% | 9% | 1% | |
63 | HE Elsa | 100% | 78% | 24% | 3% | - | - | - |
64 | LIN Gianna | 100% | 94% | 68% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - |
65 | MARTIN-HARVEY Connelly | 100% | 82% | 40% | 10% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.