Milwaukee, WI - Milwaukee, WI, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | PAN Jack (Yuxiang) | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 7% |
| 2 | ANGLADE Junior Ronald (RJ) E. | - | - | - | 4% | 20% | 42% | 33% |
| 3 | WOOD Elden S. | - | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 37% | 15% |
| 3 | ZHOU Matthew R. | - | - | - | 4% | 20% | 43% | 33% |
| 5 | WILLIAMS Nolan E. | - | - | - | 3% | 18% | 43% | 36% |
| 6 | KUSHKOV Simon O. | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 37% | 54% |
| 7 | DESROSIERS Olivier | - | - | 1% | 5% | 23% | 43% | 28% |
| 8 | LILOV Neil | - | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 39% | 18% |
| 9 | YANG Ziyi | - | 1% | 9% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 6% |
| 10 | CALLAHAN Jaden P. | - | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 38% | 20% |
| 11 | HARVEY Nicholas J. | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 34% | 31% | 11% |
| 12 | SHI Andrew | - | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 43% | 26% |
| 13 | CAI Lawrence (Larry) | - | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 41% | 19% |
| 14 | CHOI HYUNSEOK | - | - | - | 2% | 12% | 38% | 47% |
| 15 | KIM Minwook | - | - | 1% | 5% | 22% | 42% | 31% |
| 16 | LINSKY Matthew | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 38% | 24% | 5% |
| 17 | LAI Adam J. | - | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 37% | 16% |
| 17 | MORRILL Justin | - | 4% | 17% | 35% | 31% | 12% | 2% |
| 19 | HARLEY Colby A. | - | - | - | 2% | 16% | 43% | 39% |
| 20 | YOUNG Nash | - | - | 3% | 14% | 34% | 37% | 12% |
| 21 | LUKASHENKO Darii | - | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 38% | 18% |
| 22 | LIMB Matthew G. | - | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 42% | 31% |
| 23 | SOHN Kevin J. | - | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 41% | 22% |
| 24 | DHINGRA Gian K. | - | 2% | 11% | 32% | 39% | 16% | |
| 25 | HONG Marshall Q. | - | - | 1% | 5% | 22% | 42% | 30% |
| 26 | LO Joshua H. | - | - | 7% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 5% |
| 27 | LIANG Connor | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 42% | 38% |
| 28 | WIND Nicky E. | - | 2% | 13% | 30% | 34% | 17% | 3% |
| 29 | DODRILL Grant | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 40% | 21% | |
| 30 | LIU kelly | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 2% |
| 31 | WOODWARD Connor | - | 1% | 9% | 26% | 36% | 22% | 5% |
| 32 | HE Brendan | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 36% | 18% | 3% |
| 33 | DENNER Lysander H. | - | - | 2% | 9% | 27% | 39% | 23% |
| 34 | DROZ Camden J. | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 41% | 23% | |
| 35 | ERACHSHAW Taras P. | - | - | 2% | 12% | 33% | 39% | 15% |
| 36 | HUSSAIN Faaris | - | - | 4% | 19% | 38% | 31% | 8% |
| 37 | CHEN Oscar | - | 6% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
| 38 | LIM Ryan Y. | - | - | 1% | 6% | 26% | 43% | 25% |
| 39 | YEN Preston | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 5% |
| 40 | RAI Avin | - | - | 4% | 19% | 36% | 31% | 9% |
| 41 | KIM Avery J. | - | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 41% | 32% |
| 42 | CHAYEVSKY Kirk | - | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 36% | 16% |
| 43 | MORRILL William | - | 2% | 14% | 33% | 34% | 15% | 3% |
| 44 | BOLTON Braydon A. | - | 1% | 6% | 19% | 35% | 30% | 10% |
| 45 | TRAVERS Samir T. | - | - | 2% | 12% | 33% | 38% | 15% |
| 46 | YAO Jonathan | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 5% |
| 47 | BENAVRAM Lev C. | - | - | - | 3% | 16% | 42% | 39% |
| 48 | POPE Nico | - | 2% | 10% | 27% | 35% | 21% | 4% |
| 49 | FRISHMAN Ethan J. | - | 3% | 13% | 32% | 36% | 16% | |
| 50 | AURAY Phileas | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 31% | 10% | |
| 51 | TANN Justin | 5% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 8% | 1% | |
| 52 | ZHOU Justin | - | - | 3% | 15% | 38% | 36% | 8% |
| 53 | HAMMER Peter A. | - | - | 3% | 13% | 31% | 36% | 17% |
| 54 | WILSON Jude | - | - | 2% | 12% | 34% | 39% | 13% |
| 54 | YANG Richard | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 16% | 3% |
| 56 | TANG Alex Y. | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 5% |
| 57 | BAILEY Asher | - | 3% | 14% | 30% | 33% | 17% | 3% |
| 58 | SO Hananiah | - | 1% | 6% | 20% | 35% | 30% | 10% |
| 59 | YANG Kevin S. | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 42% | 24% | |
| 60 | ZHOU Kevin | 3% | 16% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 2% | |
| 61 | JARAMILLO Tobias L. | - | 2% | 14% | 34% | 34% | 14% | 2% |
| 62 | TRINH Trevor Z. | 1% | 5% | 18% | 32% | 29% | 13% | 2% |
| 63 | HARRIS Alex K. | - | 2% | 10% | 27% | 35% | 21% | 5% |
| 64 | CZYZEWSKI Konrad R. | - | 3% | 14% | 31% | 34% | 16% | 3% |
| 65 | KAYDALIN Artyom | 1% | 6% | 20% | 32% | 28% | 12% | 2% |
| 66 | OWENS William | - | 2% | 12% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 4% |
| 67 | JI Cody Walter | - | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 37% | 20% |
| 68 | NG Jonathan H. | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 6% |
| 69 | LIU David J. | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 5% |
| 70 | GUAY-TARDIF Xavier | - | - | 1% | 10% | 32% | 41% | 16% |
| 71 | NOBLE Daniel | - | - | 5% | 21% | 38% | 29% | 7% |
| 72 | DIACOS Jordan | - | 1% | 9% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 6% |
| 73 | RAJA Arnav | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 35% | 20% | 4% |
| 74 | LEE Aydan J. | 1% | 12% | 31% | 34% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 75 | LIN John A. | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 42% | 20% | |
| 76 | NEUHEARDT Peter | 7% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 6% | 1% | |
| 77 | PETRAMALE Samuel J. | 1% | 19% | 37% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 78 | SILBERZWEIG Jordan H. | - | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 42% | 29% |
| 79 | BERGER Oliver | - | 2% | 10% | 27% | 35% | 21% | 5% |
| 80 | SUBBIAH Prashanth V. | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 5% |
| 80 | DANNULL Lukas J. | - | - | 4% | 15% | 33% | 34% | 14% |
| 82 | LE Hayden | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 6% |
| 83 | MILLER Levi H. | - | 3% | 13% | 29% | 33% | 18% | 4% |
| 83 | PAN Jerry | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 3% |
| 85 | MOSZCZYNSKI Adam | - | - | 3% | 13% | 32% | 37% | 15% |
| 86 | CHAN Matthew | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 34% | 16% | 3% |
| 87 | DU Gavin J. | 1% | 10% | 27% | 33% | 21% | 7% | 1% |
| 88 | KIM Andrew H. | - | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 38% | 17% |
| 88 | LASORSA Matthew | - | - | 5% | 22% | 39% | 28% | 6% |
| 90 | JEAN Noe T. | - | 1% | 6% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 9% |
| 91 | FLORES Peter D. | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 5% |
| 92 | MAHONEY Colin M. | - | 2% | 10% | 26% | 35% | 22% | 5% |
| 93 | LU Timothy | - | 4% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 9% | 1% |
| 94 | HAMMERSTROM Jared | - | 5% | 22% | 37% | 28% | 7% | |
| 95 | LUO ZIRUI | 3% | 17% | 35% | 32% | 12% | 2% | |
| 96 | KIM-COGAN Ryan | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 35% | 18% | 3% |
| 97 | LEVIN Mark A. | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 39% | 20% | 3% |
| 98 | BUEKER Samuel P. | 1% | 10% | 26% | 33% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
| 99 | DENNER Maximilian P. | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 5% |
| 100 | FERNANDEZ Rodrigo | - | - | 4% | 20% | 37% | 30% | 9% |
| 101 | TONG ZACHARY | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 32% | 13% | 2% |
| 102 | BARBER William S. | - | 4% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 14% | 2% |
| 103 | LEMPERT Levy A. | 2% | 16% | 33% | 31% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 104 | DILLREE Spencer S. | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 2% |
| 105 | MAGUIRE Matthew V. | 1% | 12% | 31% | 34% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 106 | CHO Brandon | - | - | 5% | 22% | 37% | 28% | 8% |
| 107 | GINIS Nathan | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 40% | 25% | 5% |
| 108 | ALKEMPER Tristan H. | - | 5% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 9% | 1% |
| 108 | CONINE Tanner C. | 1% | 10% | 29% | 37% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 110 | HUANG Eric | 1% | 6% | 19% | 32% | 28% | 12% | 2% |
| 111 | NIL Michael Y. | - | 1% | 5% | 18% | 35% | 31% | 10% |
| 112 | CHIN Matthew W. | 1% | 7% | 24% | 36% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
| 113 | PASTOR-JOBIN Matis | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 37% | 27% | 7% |
| 114 | ALKIN Isaac | 2% | 13% | 31% | 33% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 115 | HUANG Ian | 19% | 40% | 30% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 116 | LUTHRA Arjun | 3% | 16% | 32% | 30% | 15% | 4% | - |
| 117 | GRIFFIN Nicholas D. | 1% | 10% | 25% | 33% | 23% | 8% | 1% |
| 118 | GEFELL Andrew P. | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 35% | 13% | |
| 119 | GHOSH Tuhin | 13% | 34% | 34% | 16% | 3% | - | |
| 119 | HARGENRADER Kailen A. | 1% | 12% | 32% | 35% | 17% | 3% | |
| 121 | ATEFI Daniel | 6% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 7% | 1% | |
| 122 | CZAHA Balint | 1% | 9% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 5% | |
| 123 | JOHNSON Langston C. | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 36% | 16% | 2% |
| 124 | RESHEIDAT Malik | - | 6% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 10% | 1% |
| 125 | CHANG Eliot A. | - | 3% | 14% | 30% | 32% | 17% | 3% |
| 126 | SHASHA Zane | - | 7% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 6% | 1% |
| 127 | TREJO Oliver | 45% | 39% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 128 | ASHBY Ethan J. | 7% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 5% | - | |
| 129 | JEFFORDS Alexander | - | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 43% | 26% |
| 130 | ERMAKOV Lev | 1% | 9% | 29% | 37% | 21% | 4% | |
| 131 | PAN Andrew W. | - | 2% | 10% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 5% |
| 132 | HUANG Alexander C. | 4% | 21% | 37% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 133 | VASILYEV Nikita K. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 41% | 27% |
| 134 | NI AMEN Zahir K. | - | 2% | 13% | 31% | 34% | 17% | 3% |
| 135 | HONG Vincent Q. | 2% | 12% | 30% | 33% | 18% | 5% | - |
| 136 | FREYRE DE ANDRADE Elian R. | 1% | 10% | 28% | 35% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 137 | WANG Charles | 8% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 138 | MORREALE John | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 36% | 30% | 8% |
| 139 | LAUDON Konrad | - | 3% | 17% | 35% | 31% | 12% | 2% |
| 140 | GORTON George F. | 2% | 15% | 34% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 141 | LEE Kyle | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 43% | 28% | |
| 142 | WOLFE-MCGUIRE George T. | - | 1% | 10% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 4% |
| 143 | LUO George F. | - | 3% | 18% | 38% | 30% | 10% | 1% |
| 144 | SIMAK Joseph P. | - | 4% | 17% | 35% | 30% | 12% | 2% |
| 145 | SAKHAMURI Surya | - | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 41% | 26% |
| 146 | KIM Sean G. | - | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 39% | 18% |
| 146 | PORTMANN Stein J. | - | 2% | 13% | 29% | 34% | 18% | 3% |
| 148 | VAN DER MERWE Fabian | 3% | 21% | 37% | 27% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 149 | HUANG Ethan F. | 2% | 14% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 150 | MYLEK Peter | 3% | 16% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 151 | CHEN Brian | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 38% | 29% | 7% |
| 152 | HOUTZ Jackson | 1% | 9% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 153 | NARANJO David E. | 3% | 20% | 36% | 28% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 154 | CHEN Lucas B. | 2% | 23% | 39% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 155 | ERACHSHAW Cyrus P. | 5% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 156 | PEDERSEN Leif | 1% | 5% | 18% | 31% | 30% | 14% | 2% |
| 157 | GHAYALOD ansh | 1% | 8% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 6% | 1% |
| 158 | CABLE Dante | 5% | 24% | 39% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 158 | CHEONG Heonjae | 1% | 7% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 6% | 1% |
| 160 | JAWOROWSKI Matthew | 2% | 12% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 161 | WONG James T. | 27% | 43% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 162 | FISK Ethan | 42% | 40% | 15% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 163 | HONG Steven | 7% | 28% | 38% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 164 | ZHANG Michael (Jiayuan) | 22% | 43% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 165 | CHEN Leo | 1% | 5% | 17% | 31% | 30% | 14% | 3% |
| 166 | LICHT Aaron H. | 1% | 24% | 42% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 166 | NAZLYMOV Andrei | 2% | 15% | 33% | 31% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 168 | ZENG Noah | 8% | 27% | 34% | 22% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 169 | GRASS James D. | 8% | 29% | 37% | 21% | 5% | - | |
| 170 | ZHOU Miles | 11% | 32% | 35% | 18% | 4% | - | |
| 171 | BARBER Brendan | 16% | 37% | 32% | 13% | 3% | - | |
| 172 | FENG Leo | 1% | 8% | 26% | 36% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
| 173 | BERRIO Carter E. | 1% | 6% | 23% | 36% | 25% | 7% | 1% |
| 174 | MURZYN III CJ | 5% | 20% | 33% | 27% | 12% | 3% | - |
| 175 | HAN William | 7% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 176 | BRAR Sanjeet | 3% | 16% | 31% | 30% | 15% | 4% | - |
| 177 | COLLINS Andrew M. | 10% | 33% | 36% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
| 177 | MAKLIN Edward P. | 2% | 13% | 31% | 32% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 177 | HWANG Ryan C. | 5% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 180 | YANG Duncan | 1% | 7% | 24% | 36% | 24% | 8% | 1% |
| 181 | GILMORE Thomas W. | - | 6% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 1% |
| 182 | BULL Anderson | 1% | 13% | 37% | 34% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 182 | SKINNER Graham B. | - | 4% | 17% | 32% | 31% | 14% | 2% |
| 184 | GOERING Ashton H. | 17% | 41% | 31% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 185 | COLE Alexander | 1% | 11% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 186 | NOBLE Colin | 7% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 187 | LEUNG Nathan | 31% | 42% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 188 | BUCHMANN Finn D. | 1% | 9% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
| 188 | GHENEA George Philipe | 3% | 21% | 38% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 190 | KOGAN Benjamin | - | 3% | 15% | 36% | 32% | 12% | 1% |
| 191 | BERMAN Luca | 1% | 7% | 22% | 33% | 26% | 10% | 1% |
| 192 | ZHANG Jeffrey | 10% | 29% | 34% | 20% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 193 | GREENBAUM Ian L. | 4% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 194 | LOWHAM-RUZZO Alexander J. | 26% | 44% | 24% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 195 | GUZZO Vito | 20% | 47% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 196 | STONE Esmond A. | 11% | 37% | 34% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 197 | LO Alexander | 9% | 32% | 37% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 198 | PIWOWAR Alex | 9% | 52% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 199 | KIM Noah L. | 6% | 28% | 37% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 200 | CHEN SHENGWEN | - | 6% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 8% | 1% |
| 201 | SAINT-PIERRE-MENARD Colin | 5% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 202 | REED Samuel J. | 39% | 48% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 203 | MALONE Gregory D. | 4% | 22% | 38% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 204 | SANDERS Samuel B. | 9% | 33% | 37% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 205 | SUSANTO Samuel (sammy) | 19% | 39% | 30% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 206 | GARCIA Ryan | 54% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
| 207 | KIM Alexander M. | 4% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 11% | 2% | |
| 208 | LI Joshua L. | 9% | 31% | 36% | 19% | 4% | - | |
| 208 | JUNG Junhwan | 11% | 32% | 36% | 17% | 4% | - | |
| 210 | HASNAH Henry | 1% | 7% | 23% | 35% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
| 211 | YUN Jake | 1% | 11% | 27% | 33% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
| 212 | CHENG Kyle | 6% | 30% | 39% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 213 | AVAKIAN Alec | 2% | 15% | 33% | 32% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 214 | ELIN Adam E. | 25% | 40% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 215 | ZUBATIY Samuel | - | 5% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 6% | 1% |
| 216 | NUMAN Yazan M. | 3% | 16% | 31% | 30% | 15% | 4% | - |
| 217 | GAFFNEY John M. | 14% | 35% | 32% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 217 | LIU Jonathan M. | 1% | 7% | 24% | 35% | 24% | 8% | 1% |
| 217 | XU William | 7% | 27% | 38% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 220 | GREEN IV James (Bud) | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 4% |
| 221 | BONSELL Vance | 21% | 41% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 221 | BLEYMAN David | 29% | 44% | 22% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 223 | ROSBERG Dashiell W. | - | 4% | 17% | 32% | 31% | 14% | 2% |
| 223 | SHAO Peter | 16% | 39% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 225 | WU MENGKE | - | 4% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 12% | 2% |
| 226 | LEE Justin | 1% | 9% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 226 | LEITH Jack | 42% | 42% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 228 | RASMUSSEN Alexzander C. | 9% | 31% | 35% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 229 | FERNANDEZ Liam | 8% | 28% | 36% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 230 | LIU Christopher X. | 4% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 230 | BEITEL Noah | 88% | 11% | - | - | - | - | - |
| 232 | GOLD Jackson | 9% | 31% | 37% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 233 | LU Caleb Q. | 10% | 34% | 37% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 234 | YOO Joshua H. | 41% | 41% | 16% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 235 | KORINTH Alexander J. | 43% | 41% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 236 | MICHNA Colin P. | 12% | 37% | 34% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 237 | ALTIRS Alexander | 1% | 15% | 36% | 32% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 238 | SPRINGER Patrick | 64% | 30% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
| 239 | OVERDECK Andrew | 35% | 49% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 240 | CHON Taylor A. | 4% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 8% | 1% | |
| 241 | XU Andrew | 1% | 22% | 41% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 241 | LUHMAN Gabriel | 77% | 21% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
| 243 | COSGROVE Connor R. | 29% | 43% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 244 | DENG Andrew | 8% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 8% | 2% | - |
| 245 | KEEFE Duncan | 13% | 34% | 34% | 16% | 3% | - | |
| 246 | ZHOU Brian | 7% | 29% | 37% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 246 | NEVILLE James | 51% | 37% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 246 | MOULTON Ian | 77% | 21% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
| 246 | CHENG Albert | 50% | 38% | 11% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 250 | LOPEZ Lucas M. | 57% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 250 | CHAN Aidan | 43% | 40% | 15% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 250 | WANG Andy | 33% | 43% | 20% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 253 | WANG YiLe(Justin) | 52% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 253 | MORALES Jonathan | 9% | 46% | 34% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 253 | PANDEY Neil | 35% | 41% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 256 | CHAVES Matthew J. | 4% | 21% | 38% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 256 | CHAUDHURI Eeshaan A. | 31% | 43% | 21% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 258 | CHANIN Liam R. | 46% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 259 | SMITH Vaughn | 44% | 42% | 12% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 259 | CADAMBE Rishi | 81% | 17% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
| 261 | RASMUSSEN Oliver | 31% | 43% | 21% | 5% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.