November NAC

Cadet Men's Saber

Saturday, November 9, 2019 at 8:00 AM

Milwaukee, WI - Milwaukee, WI, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 PAN Jack (Yuxiang) 100% 100% 99% 93% 72% 36% 7%
2 ANGLADE Junior Ronald (RJ) E. 100% 100% 100% 100% 95% 76% 33%
3 WOOD Elden S. 100% 100% 100% 98% 85% 52% 15%
3 ZHOU Matthew R. 100% 100% 100% 100% 96% 75% 33%
5 WILLIAMS Nolan E. 100% 100% 100% 100% 97% 79% 36%
6 KUSHKOV Simon O. 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 90% 54%
7 DESROSIERS Olivier 100% 100% 100% 99% 94% 71% 28%
8 LILOV Neil 100% 100% 100% 98% 87% 57% 18%
9 YANG Ziyi 100% 100% 99% 90% 65% 29% 6%
10 CALLAHAN Jaden P. 100% 100% 100% 98% 87% 58% 20%
11 HARVEY Nicholas J. 100% 100% 99% 94% 76% 42% 11%
12 SHI Andrew 100% 100% 100% 99% 93% 68% 26%
13 CAI Lawrence (Larry) 100% 100% 100% 98% 89% 60% 19%
14 CHOI HYUNSEOK 100% 100% 100% 100% 98% 86% 47%
15 KIM Minwook 100% 100% 100% 99% 94% 72% 31%
16 LINSKY Matthew 100% 100% 99% 92% 67% 29% 5%
17 LAI Adam J. 100% 100% 100% 97% 85% 54% 16%
17 MORRILL Justin 100% 100% 96% 79% 44% 14% 2%
19 HARLEY Colby A. 100% 100% 100% 100% 97% 82% 39%
20 YOUNG Nash 100% 100% 100% 97% 83% 49% 12%
21 LUKASHENKO Darii 100% 100% 100% 98% 87% 57% 18%
22 LIMB Matthew G. 100% 100% 100% 99% 94% 73% 31%
23 SOHN Kevin J. 100% 100% 100% 99% 90% 63% 22%
24 DHINGRA Gian K. 100% 100% 98% 87% 55% 16%
25 HONG Marshall Q. 100% 100% 100% 99% 94% 72% 30%
26 LO Joshua H. 100% 100% 100% 93% 68% 29% 5%
27 LIANG Connor 100% 100% 100% 100% 97% 80% 38%
28 WIND Nicky E. 100% 100% 97% 84% 54% 20% 3%
29 DODRILL Grant 100% 100% 99% 90% 62% 21%
30 LIU kelly 100% 100% 97% 82% 49% 16% 2%
31 WOODWARD Connor 100% 100% 99% 90% 63% 27% 5%
32 HE Brendan 100% 100% 98% 87% 58% 22% 3%
33 DENNER Lysander H. 100% 100% 100% 98% 89% 62% 23%
34 DROZ Camden J. 100% 100% 99% 91% 64% 23%
35 ERACHSHAW Taras P. 100% 100% 100% 98% 86% 54% 15%
36 HUSSAIN Faaris 100% 100% 100% 95% 76% 38% 8%
37 CHEN Oscar 100% 100% 94% 72% 36% 10% 1%
38 LIM Ryan Y. 100% 100% 100% 99% 93% 67% 25%
39 YEN Preston 100% 100% 99% 90% 65% 28% 5%
40 RAI Avin 100% 100% 100% 95% 76% 40% 9%
41 KIM Avery J. 100% 100% 100% 99% 94% 74% 32%
42 CHAYEVSKY Kirk 100% 100% 100% 97% 83% 51% 16%
43 MORRILL William 100% 100% 98% 85% 52% 18% 3%
44 BOLTON Braydon A. 100% 100% 99% 94% 74% 40% 10%
45 TRAVERS Samir T. 100% 100% 100% 98% 85% 52% 15%
46 YAO Jonathan 100% 100% 99% 91% 63% 26% 5%
47 BENAVRAM Lev C. 100% 100% 100% 100% 97% 81% 39%
48 POPE Nico 100% 100% 98% 88% 61% 25% 4%
49 FRISHMAN Ethan J. 100% 100% 97% 84% 52% 16%
50 AURAY Phileas 100% 100% 95% 77% 41% 10%
51 TANN Justin 100% 95% 71% 35% 9% 1%
52 ZHOU Justin 100% 100% 100% 97% 81% 44% 8%
53 HAMMER Peter A. 100% 100% 100% 97% 84% 53% 17%
54 WILSON Jude 100% 100% 100% 98% 86% 52% 13%
54 YANG Richard 100% 100% 97% 83% 51% 18% 3%
56 TANG Alex Y. 100% 100% 99% 92% 65% 28% 5%
57 BAILEY Asher 100% 100% 97% 83% 54% 21% 3%
58 SO Hananiah 100% 100% 99% 94% 74% 39% 10%
59 YANG Kevin S. 100% 100% 99% 92% 66% 24%
60 ZHOU Kevin 100% 97% 81% 48% 16% 2%
61 JARAMILLO Tobias L. 100% 100% 98% 84% 49% 16% 2%
62 TRINH Trevor Z. 100% 99% 94% 76% 44% 15% 2%
63 HARRIS Alex K. 100% 100% 98% 88% 61% 26% 5%
64 CZYZEWSKI Konrad R. 100% 100% 97% 84% 53% 19% 3%
65 KAYDALIN Artyom 100% 99% 93% 73% 42% 14% 2%
66 OWENS William 100% 100% 98% 86% 58% 24% 4%
67 JI Cody Walter 100% 100% 100% 97% 86% 57% 20%
68 NG Jonathan H. 100% 100% 99% 92% 68% 31% 6%
69 LIU David J. 100% 100% 99% 91% 66% 29% 5%
70 GUAY-TARDIF Xavier 100% 100% 100% 99% 89% 57% 16%
71 NOBLE Daniel 100% 100% 100% 95% 74% 36% 7%
72 DIACOS Jordan 100% 100% 98% 90% 65% 30% 6%
73 RAJA Arnav 100% 100% 98% 87% 59% 24% 4%
74 LEE Aydan J. 100% 99% 87% 56% 22% 5% -
75 LIN John A. 100% 100% 99% 90% 62% 20%
76 NEUHEARDT Peter 100% 93% 67% 30% 7% 1%
77 PETRAMALE Samuel J. 100% 99% 80% 43% 14% 2% -
78 SILBERZWEIG Jordan H. 100% 100% 100% 99% 93% 70% 29%
79 BERGER Oliver 100% 100% 98% 88% 61% 26% 5%
80 SUBBIAH Prashanth V. 100% 100% 99% 91% 65% 28% 5%
80 DANNULL Lukas J. 100% 100% 100% 96% 81% 48% 14%
82 LE Hayden 100% 100% 99% 92% 69% 32% 6%
83 MILLER Levi H. 100% 100% 97% 84% 55% 22% 4%
83 PAN Jerry 100% 100% 98% 87% 58% 22% 3%
85 MOSZCZYNSKI Adam 100% 100% 100% 97% 84% 52% 15%
86 CHAN Matthew 100% 100% 98% 85% 52% 18% 3%
87 DU Gavin J. 100% 99% 89% 62% 29% 7% 1%
88 KIM Andrew H. 100% 100% 100% 98% 86% 55% 17%
88 LASORSA Matthew 100% 100% 100% 95% 73% 34% 6%
90 JEAN Noe T. 100% 100% 99% 93% 73% 38% 9%
91 FLORES Peter D. 100% 100% 99% 91% 66% 29% 5%
92 MAHONEY Colin M. 100% 100% 98% 89% 62% 28% 5%
93 LU Timothy 100% 100% 96% 75% 38% 11% 1%
94 HAMMERSTROM Jared 100% 100% 94% 72% 35% 7%
95 LUO ZIRUI 100% 97% 80% 45% 14% 2%
96 KIM-COGAN Ryan 100% 100% 98% 86% 56% 21% 3%
97 LEVIN Mark A. 100% 100% 99% 90% 62% 22% 3%
98 BUEKER Samuel P. 100% 99% 89% 63% 29% 8% 1%
99 DENNER Maximilian P. 100% 100% 99% 91% 65% 28% 5%
100 FERNANDEZ Rodrigo 100% 100% 100% 95% 75% 38% 9%
101 TONG ZACHARY 100% 100% 97% 81% 47% 14% 2%
102 BARBER William S. 100% 100% 96% 81% 49% 17% 2%
103 LEMPERT Levy A. 100% 98% 81% 48% 18% 4% -
104 DILLREE Spencer S. 100% 100% 97% 82% 49% 16% 2%
105 MAGUIRE Matthew V. 100% 99% 87% 56% 22% 4% -
106 CHO Brandon 100% 100% 100% 94% 73% 36% 8%
107 GINIS Nathan 100% 100% 99% 93% 69% 30% 5%
108 ALKEMPER Tristan H. 100% 100% 95% 74% 38% 10% 1%
108 CONINE Tanner C. 100% 99% 89% 60% 23% 4% -
110 HUANG Eric 100% 99% 94% 75% 43% 14% 2%
111 NIL Michael Y. 100% 100% 99% 94% 76% 41% 10%
112 CHIN Matthew W. 100% 99% 93% 68% 33% 8% 1%
113 PASTOR-JOBIN Matis 100% 100% 99% 93% 70% 33% 7%
114 ALKIN Isaac 100% 98% 85% 54% 21% 4% -
115 HUANG Ian 100% 81% 41% 11% 1% - -
116 LUTHRA Arjun 100% 97% 81% 49% 19% 4% -
117 GRIFFIN Nicholas D. 100% 99% 89% 64% 32% 9% 1%
118 GEFELL Andrew P. 100% 100% 97% 82% 48% 13%
119 GHOSH Tuhin 100% 87% 53% 19% 4% -
119 HARGENRADER Kailen A. 100% 99% 86% 54% 20% 3%
121 ATEFI Daniel 100% 94% 68% 32% 8% 1%
122 CZAHA Balint 100% 99% 90% 63% 27% 5%
123 JOHNSON Langston C. 100% 100% 98% 86% 55% 19% 2%
124 RESHEIDAT Malik 100% 100% 94% 73% 38% 11% 1%
125 CHANG Eliot A. 100% 100% 97% 83% 53% 21% 3%
126 SHASHA Zane 100% 100% 93% 68% 31% 7% 1%
127 TREJO Oliver 100% 55% 16% 2% - - -
128 ASHBY Ethan J. 100% 93% 66% 28% 6% -
129 JEFFORDS Alexander 100% 100% 100% 99% 93% 69% 26%
130 ERMAKOV Lev 100% 99% 90% 62% 25% 4%
131 PAN Andrew W. 100% 100% 98% 88% 61% 27% 5%
132 HUANG Alexander C. 100% 96% 75% 38% 11% 1% -
133 VASILYEV Nikita K. 100% 100% 100% 99% 92% 68% 27%
134 NI AMEN Zahir K. 100% 100% 98% 84% 53% 20% 3%
135 HONG Vincent Q. 100% 98% 86% 56% 23% 5% -
136 FREYRE DE ANDRADE Elian R. 100% 99% 89% 61% 25% 5% -
137 WANG Charles 100% 92% 66% 30% 8% 1% -
138 MORREALE John 100% 100% 99% 94% 74% 38% 8%
139 LAUDON Konrad 100% 100% 97% 79% 44% 14% 2%
140 GORTON George F. 100% 98% 83% 49% 16% 2% -
141 LEE Kyle 100% 100% 99% 94% 71% 28%
142 WOLFE-MCGUIRE George T. 100% 100% 99% 88% 60% 24% 4%
143 LUO George F. 100% 100% 97% 79% 42% 11% 1%
144 SIMAK Joseph P. 100% 100% 96% 78% 44% 14% 2%
145 SAKHAMURI Surya 100% 100% 100% 99% 92% 67% 26%
146 KIM Sean G. 100% 100% 100% 98% 87% 57% 18%
146 PORTMANN Stein J. 100% 100% 97% 85% 55% 21% 3%
148 VAN DER MERWE Fabian 100% 97% 75% 38% 11% 1% -
149 HUANG Ethan F. 100% 98% 84% 51% 19% 4% -
150 MYLEK Peter 100% 97% 82% 49% 17% 3% -
151 CHEN Brian 100% 100% 99% 95% 75% 37% 7%
152 HOUTZ Jackson 100% 99% 90% 64% 27% 6% -
153 NARANJO David E. 100% 97% 77% 41% 13% 2% -
154 CHEN Lucas B. 100% 98% 75% 36% 10% 1% -
155 ERACHSHAW Cyrus P. 100% 95% 69% 33% 9% 1% -
156 PEDERSEN Leif 100% 99% 95% 77% 46% 16% 2%
157 GHAYALOD ansh 100% 99% 92% 66% 30% 7% 1%
158 CABLE Dante 100% 95% 71% 32% 7% 1% -
158 CHEONG Heonjae 100% 99% 92% 66% 30% 7% 1%
160 JAWOROWSKI Matthew 100% 98% 87% 57% 22% 5% -
161 WONG James T. 100% 73% 30% 6% 1% - -
162 FISK Ethan 100% 58% 18% 3% - - -
163 HONG Steven 100% 93% 66% 28% 6% 1% -
164 ZHANG Michael (Jiayuan) 100% 78% 36% 9% 1% - -
165 CHEN Leo 100% 99% 94% 77% 46% 17% 3%
166 LICHT Aaron H. 100% 99% 74% 33% 8% 1% -
166 NAZLYMOV Andrei 100% 98% 82% 50% 19% 4% -
168 ZENG Noah 100% 92% 65% 31% 9% 1% -
169 GRASS James D. 100% 92% 63% 26% 5% -
170 ZHOU Miles 100% 89% 57% 22% 4% -
171 BARBER Brendan 100% 84% 47% 16% 3% -
172 FENG Leo 100% 99% 91% 64% 29% 7% 1%
173 BERRIO Carter E. 100% 99% 93% 70% 34% 8% 1%
174 MURZYN III CJ 100% 95% 75% 43% 15% 3% -
175 HAN William 100% 93% 64% 27% 7% 1% -
176 BRAR Sanjeet 100% 97% 80% 49% 20% 4% -
177 COLLINS Andrew M. 100% 90% 58% 22% 4% - -
177 MAKLIN Edward P. 100% 98% 85% 54% 22% 5% -
177 HWANG Ryan C. 100% 95% 72% 35% 9% 1% -
180 YANG Duncan 100% 99% 93% 69% 33% 8% 1%
181 GILMORE Thomas W. 100% 100% 94% 73% 38% 11% 1%
182 BULL Anderson 100% 99% 86% 49% 15% 2% -
182 SKINNER Graham B. 100% 100% 96% 79% 47% 16% 2%
184 GOERING Ashton H. 100% 83% 42% 11% 2% - -
185 COLE Alexander 100% 99% 88% 58% 23% 5% -
186 NOBLE Colin 100% 93% 68% 33% 10% 1% -
187 LEUNG Nathan 100% 69% 27% 6% 1% - -
188 BUCHMANN Finn D. 100% 99% 90% 64% 30% 8% 1%
188 GHENEA George Philipe 100% 97% 76% 38% 10% 1% -
190 KOGAN Benjamin 100% 100% 97% 82% 46% 13% 1%
191 BERMAN Luca 100% 99% 92% 70% 37% 11% 1%
192 ZHANG Jeffrey 100% 90% 61% 28% 7% 1% -
193 GREENBAUM Ian L. 100% 96% 76% 40% 13% 2% -
194 LOWHAM-RUZZO Alexander J. 100% 74% 30% 6% 1% - -
195 GUZZO Vito 100% 80% 33% 7% 1% - -
196 STONE Esmond A. 100% 89% 51% 17% 3% - -
197 LO Alexander 100% 91% 59% 22% 4% - -
198 PIWOWAR Alex 100% 91% 39% 8% 1% - -
199 KIM Noah L. 100% 94% 66% 29% 7% 1% -
200 CHEN SHENGWEN 100% 100% 93% 69% 33% 9% 1%
201 SAINT-PIERRE-MENARD Colin 100% 95% 72% 35% 9% 1% -
202 REED Samuel J. 100% 61% 13% 1% - - -
203 MALONE Gregory D. 100% 96% 74% 35% 9% 1% -
204 SANDERS Samuel B. 100% 91% 58% 21% 4% - -
205 SUSANTO Samuel (sammy) 100% 81% 42% 12% 2% -
206 GARCIA Ryan 100% 46% 10% 1% - -
207 KIM Alexander M. 100% 96% 77% 42% 13% 2%
208 LI Joshua L. 100% 91% 60% 24% 5% -
208 JUNG Junhwan 100% 89% 57% 21% 4% -
210 HASNAH Henry 100% 99% 92% 69% 34% 9% 1%
211 YUN Jake 100% 99% 88% 61% 28% 7% 1%
212 CHENG Kyle 100% 94% 65% 26% 5% 1% -
213 AVAKIAN Alec 100% 98% 84% 51% 19% 3% -
214 ELIN Adam E. 100% 75% 35% 9% 1% - -
215 ZUBATIY Samuel 100% 100% 95% 69% 30% 7% 1%
216 NUMAN Yazan M. 100% 97% 80% 49% 19% 4% -
217 GAFFNEY John M. 100% 86% 51% 19% 4% - -
217 LIU Jonathan M. 100% 99% 92% 68% 33% 9% 1%
217 XU William 100% 93% 66% 28% 6% 1% -
220 GREEN IV James (Bud) 100% 100% 99% 91% 65% 28% 4%
221 BONSELL Vance 100% 79% 39% 10% 1% - -
221 BLEYMAN David 100% 71% 27% 5% - - -
223 ROSBERG Dashiell W. 100% 100% 96% 79% 47% 16% 2%
223 SHAO Peter 100% 84% 44% 13% 2% - -
225 WU MENGKE 100% 100% 96% 77% 43% 14% 2%
226 LEE Justin 100% 99% 90% 61% 25% 6% -
226 LEITH Jack 100% 58% 16% 2% - - -
228 RASMUSSEN Alexzander C. 100% 91% 60% 25% 6% 1% -
229 FERNANDEZ Liam 100% 92% 65% 29% 7% 1% -
230 LIU Christopher X. 100% 96% 77% 43% 15% 3% -
230 BEITEL Noah 100% 12% - - - - -
232 GOLD Jackson 100% 91% 60% 24% 5% - -
233 LU Caleb Q. 100% 90% 56% 19% 3% - -
234 YOO Joshua H. 100% 59% 19% 3% - - -
235 KORINTH Alexander J. 100% 57% 16% 2% - - -
236 MICHNA Colin P. 100% 88% 51% 17% 3% - -
237 ALTIRS Alexander 100% 99% 84% 48% 16% 3% -
238 SPRINGER Patrick 100% 36% 5% - - - -
239 OVERDECK Andrew 100% 65% 17% 2% - - -
240 CHON Taylor A. 100% 96% 73% 35% 9% 1%
241 XU Andrew 100% 99% 78% 36% 9% 1% -
241 LUHMAN Gabriel 100% 23% 1% - - - -
243 COSGROVE Connor R. 100% 71% 28% 6% 1% - -
244 DENG Andrew 100% 92% 67% 33% 10% 2% -
245 KEEFE Duncan 100% 87% 53% 19% 3% -
246 ZHOU Brian 100% 93% 65% 28% 7% 1% -
246 NEVILLE James 100% 49% 12% 2% - - -
246 MOULTON Ian 100% 23% 2% - - - -
246 CHENG Albert 100% 50% 13% 2% - - -
250 LOPEZ Lucas M. 100% 43% 8% 1% - - -
250 CHAN Aidan 100% 57% 18% 3% - - -
250 WANG Andy 100% 67% 24% 4% - - -
253 WANG YiLe(Justin) 100% 48% 11% 1% - - -
253 MORALES Jonathan 100% 91% 45% 11% 1% - -
253 PANDEY Neil 100% 65% 25% 5% 1% - -
256 CHAVES Matthew J. 100% 96% 76% 38% 11% 1% -
256 CHAUDHURI Eeshaan A. 100% 69% 26% 5% - - -
258 CHANIN Liam R. 100% 54% 14% 2% - - -
259 SMITH Vaughn 100% 56% 14% 2% - - -
259 CADAMBE Rishi 100% 19% 1% - - - -
261 RASMUSSEN Oliver 100% 69% 26% 5% 1% - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.