Indianapolis Fencing Club - Indianapolis, IN, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1 | GERACI Paul A. | - | - | 4% | 24% | 50% | 22% |
| 2 | THOMAS Samuel | - | - | 3% | 20% | 45% | 32% |
| 3 | HANAHAN Thomas M. | - | - | 5% | 21% | 43% | 31% |
| 3 | REED Dusty (Allen) | 2% | 22% | 42% | 28% | 6% | |
| 5 | RIPLEY Ian | 1% | 10% | 37% | 40% | 13% | |
| 6 | SON Eric | - | - | 4% | 20% | 43% | 33% |
| 7 | STENNIS Brendan | 7% | 28% | 38% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 8 | FANG Samuel | 1% | 17% | 41% | 32% | 8% | 1% |
| 9 | PAMERLEAU Ian | - | 1% | 14% | 37% | 36% | 12% |
| 10 | LASKA Patryk | - | 3% | 21% | 45% | 31% | |
| 11 | GUILFORD Corey | - | 3% | 22% | 41% | 28% | 6% |
| 12 | ARMBRUSTER David | - | 5% | 32% | 43% | 18% | 2% |
| 13 | KRAVITZ Sarah | 3% | 26% | 46% | 22% | 3% | |
| 14 | SOARE Maria Elena | 16% | 38% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 15 | VANCE Sam | 46% | 43% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 16 | ARMBRUSTER John | 30% | 57% | 12% | 1% | - | - |
| 17 | WANG Peter | 2% | 13% | 33% | 35% | 15% | 2% |
| 18 | DVORAK Ryan | 1% | 10% | 27% | 35% | 21% | 5% |
| 19 | CRAPNELL Daniel | 2% | 32% | 44% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 20 | DICKSON Tim | - | 5% | 28% | 42% | 22% | 3% |
| 21 | MILLER Jackson | 16% | 39% | 33% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 22 | CREEMER Lawrence | 71% | 26% | 3% | - | - | |
| 23 | DAWES Isabel | 28% | 50% | 19% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.