Indianapolis Fencing Club - Indianapolis, IN, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1 | GERACI Paul A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 72% | 22% |
| 2 | THOMAS Samuel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 77% | 32% |
| 3 | HANAHAN Thomas M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 31% |
| 3 | REED Dusty (Allen) | 100% | 98% | 76% | 34% | 6% | |
| 5 | RIPLEY Ian | 100% | 99% | 89% | 53% | 13% | |
| 6 | SON Eric | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 33% |
| 7 | STENNIS Brendan | 100% | 93% | 65% | 27% | 5% | - |
| 8 | FANG Samuel | 100% | 99% | 82% | 41% | 9% | 1% |
| 9 | PAMERLEAU Ian | 100% | 100% | 99% | 84% | 47% | 12% |
| 10 | LASKA Patryk | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 31% | |
| 11 | GUILFORD Corey | 100% | 100% | 97% | 75% | 34% | 6% |
| 12 | ARMBRUSTER David | 100% | 100% | 95% | 63% | 20% | 2% |
| 13 | KRAVITZ Sarah | 100% | 97% | 71% | 25% | 3% | |
| 14 | SOARE Maria Elena | 100% | 84% | 45% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 15 | VANCE Sam | 100% | 54% | 12% | 1% | - | - |
| 16 | ARMBRUSTER John | 100% | 70% | 13% | 1% | - | - |
| 17 | WANG Peter | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 17% | 2% |
| 18 | DVORAK Ryan | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 26% | 5% |
| 19 | CRAPNELL Daniel | 100% | 98% | 66% | 22% | 3% | - |
| 20 | DICKSON Tim | 100% | 100% | 95% | 67% | 25% | 3% |
| 21 | MILLER Jackson | 100% | 84% | 45% | 12% | 1% | - |
| 22 | CREEMER Lawrence | 100% | 29% | 3% | - | - | |
| 23 | DAWES Isabel | 100% | 72% | 21% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.