Sports Events Recreation Center - The SERC - Brockport, NY, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | CHEN Ethan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 28% |
| 2 | TANG Alexander L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 50% |
| 3 | GUTH Joseph | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 44% |
| 3 | GRIFFITH MCALLISTER Thomas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 27% |
| 5 | ZHANG Lucas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 52% | 16% |
| 5 | DOELL Ethan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 30% |
| 7 | VADEN Oliver | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 29% |
| 8 | PARRISH Evan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 42% |
| 9 | ZENG Rick | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 42% | 10% |
| 10 | CHOI Benjamin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 43% | 8% |
| 11 | HAN Alexander | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 27% | 6% | 1% |
| 12 | LU Alex | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 50% | 11% |
| 13 | TOOMRE Kai | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 41% | 9% |
| 14 | GRIGORIEV Michael | 100% | 99% | 93% | 67% | 30% | 7% | 1% |
| 15 | YU Haochen | 100% | 98% | 87% | 60% | 28% | 8% | 1% |
| 16 | CHENG Logan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 24% |
| 17 | HOU Gaven | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 60% | 26% | 5% |
| 18 | KINGSLEY Griffin | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 50% | 16% | 2% |
| 19 | ZHAI Derrick | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 42% | 12% | 1% |
| 20 | XIE Jicheng | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 50% | 18% | 3% |
| 21 | WANG Luke | 100% | 98% | 80% | 44% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 22 | KO Caleb | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 64% | 23% | 3% |
| 23 | QIAN Zekai | 100% | 99% | 87% | 55% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 24 | TANG Royce | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 66% | 31% | 7% |
| 25 | CHEN kenneth | 100% | 94% | 64% | 25% | 5% | - | - |
| 26 | SHAW Spencer | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 26 | BELCHAMBER Mason | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 41% | 11% | 1% |
| 28 | BAI Austin | 100% | 92% | 65% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 29 | WANG Daniel | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 30% | 8% | 1% |
| 30 | GE Felix Fei | 100% | 98% | 87% | 60% | 27% | 7% | 1% |
| 31 | MO Ethan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 58% | 24% | 3% |
| 32 | HUANG Jinyao | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 47% | 14% | 1% |
| 33 | SHAW eric | 100% | 95% | 73% | 39% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 34 | AMR HOSSNY Adam | 100% | 97% | 75% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 35 | SONG Yuxuan Austin | 100% | 91% | 61% | 25% | 5% | - | - |
| 36 | WANG Ancen | 100% | 94% | 71% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 37 | WEI JR Shan | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 32% | 8% | 1% |
| 38 | PAN Howard Haoran | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 52% | 18% | 3% |
| 39 | WANG Mendy | 100% | 96% | 78% | 46% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 40 | ZHAI Alex | 100% | 95% | 73% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 41 | TAN Charlie | 100% | 99% | 89% | 64% | 31% | 9% | 1% |
| 42 | TONG Anson Tin Hang | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 43 | LU Hansen | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 28% | 6% | - |
| 44 | KIM Joshua Yeohwi | 100% | 65% | 22% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 45 | JIN Xuechong Daniel | 100% | 97% | 77% | 41% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 46 | ZENG Albert | 100% | 90% | 60% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 46 | PUTHOFF Henry | 100% | 85% | 42% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 48 | ZHUANG Disheng | 100% | 90% | 61% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 49 | MAZAHERI Theodore | 100% | 64% | 21% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 50 | NG Kai | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 26% | 5% | - |
| 51 | HAN Felix | 100% | 59% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 51 | JI Dachai | 100% | 97% | 76% | 39% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 53 | HUANG Anthony | 100% | 77% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 54 | CHAU Ivan | 100% | 90% | 60% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 55 | LIN George | 100% | 84% | 42% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 55 | LIN Richard | 100% | 58% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.