13th Annual Yellow Jacket Open

Div III Mixed Épée

Saturday, March 11, 2023 at 2:00 PM

Georgia Tech Campus Recreation Center: Atlanta, GA - Atlanta, GA, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 YANAMANDRA Sidhansh - 4% 19% 36% 30% 10% 1%
2 AHN Yuchan - - 1% 9% 29% 41% 19%
3 LIU Dylan Y. - - 1% 9% 33% 41% 17%
3 LENAHAN Conor J. - - - 2% 12% 40% 47%
5 YANG Maximus - 1% 5% 21% 40% 28% 5%
6 WOLF Christopher - - 4% 16% 35% 33% 12%
7 HAN Ethan - - 3% 16% 37% 34% 9%
8 DEMAREE Adam - 1% 8% 24% 36% 25% 7%
9 JOHNSTON Kellan - 1% 11% 34% 38% 15% 2%
10 SHAFRITZ Noah - 2% 12% 29% 34% 19% 4%
11 MCDANIEL Eamon 1% 13% 35% 35% 14% 2% < 1%
12 NG Joshua Z. - - 1% 8% 30% 42% 19%
13 FAN Yuchen 1% 13% 35% 34% 14% 2% -
14 CHUNG Joseph - - 3% 15% 35% 34% 12%
15 FORD Tillman - 3% 16% 32% 31% 15% 3%
16 ILENRE Roni 1% 8% 24% 34% 24% 8% 1%
17 HONG Ryan - 4% 16% 33% 31% 14% 2%
18 CORLEY Avery - - - 3% 18% 45% 35%
19 ARUN Vikhyat - 1% 5% 18% 36% 32% 8%
20 WEDDLE Carson - 3% 16% 35% 32% 12% 2%
21 JUNG Elliot - 2% 13% 36% 34% 13% 2%
22 MAXWELL Austin - - 2% 10% 28% 39% 21%
23 SINGH Siddhant - 1% 6% 21% 35% 28% 9%
24 FULLERTON Joshua D. - - 1% 7% 25% 41% 25%
25 KOTHA Maanas - 7% 25% 38% 24% 6% 1%
26 TUCKER Evan 1% 5% 18% 33% 30% 12% 2%
27 SUNDQUIST Matthew - 1% 5% 18% 35% 31% 10%
28 BOLLE Elijah 1% 13% 32% 33% 17% 4% -
29 PRICE Jordan - - 4% 18% 35% 32% 11%
30 DECKER Carlton - - 4% 16% 34% 33% 12%
31 BERNSTEIN Matthew B. - - 4% 19% 37% 31% 9%
32 NONKOOKETKHONG Pakon 9% 30% 36% 20% 5% 1% -
33 LEE Daehyeon 2% 14% 34% 34% 14% 2% < 1%
34 JOSEPH Matthew - 1% 7% 21% 35% 28% 8%
35 PULLEN Ayah - - 6% 24% 38% 25% 6%
36 HONG Robin 3% 23% 43% 25% 5% < 1% -
37 CHOI David 7% 27% 36% 23% 7% 1% -
38 LANGUASCO Michael - 2% 11% 29% 35% 20% 4%
39 BROWN Matt - 4% 18% 34% 31% 12% 1%
40 ADIBZADEH Mehrdad - 1% 6% 23% 37% 26% 7%
40 CORDOVA Colin 1% 11% 31% 36% 17% 4% -
40 SOPER Adam - - 2% 14% 37% 36% 10%
43 BELL Adam - 2% 11% 26% 34% 21% 5%
44 ROBINSON Blake 1% 18% 37% 30% 12% 2% -
45 JACKSON Viktoria 2% 11% 28% 33% 20% 6% 1%
45 JIN Dongwoo 13% 39% 33% 12% 2% - -
47 PELLI Madeleine 11% 40% 34% 12% 2% - -
48 KIM Sangone 4% 27% 42% 22% 4% - -
49 SCHERNIKAU Jack - - 3% 14% 34% 35% 13%
50 WILLIAMS Eli - - 1% 9% 29% 42% 19%
51 PAEK sean - - 1% 5% 22% 42% 29%
52 KUCIA Michael - - 1% 6% 28% 43% 22%
53 BLAIR Hailey 2% 16% 35% 32% 13% 2% -
54 CULLEN Reilly 13% 36% 33% 14% 3% - -
55 ARZT Nicky 3% 23% 38% 26% 8% 1% -
56 RASSEL John 1% 8% 23% 33% 24% 9% 1%
57 CARRIE Konnor - 1% 6% 19% 34% 30% 10%
58 FORSYTHE Hunter - 2% 11% 27% 34% 21% 5%
59 BANKS Lauren M. - 1% 11% 31% 37% 17% 2%
60 KARADENIZ Erek 3% 18% 35% 30% 12% 2% -
61 HAMBRICK Addison 1% 7% 26% 37% 23% 5% -
62 CHOI Adam - 2% 12% 34% 36% 14% 2%
63 RAVITA Henry 13% 48% 31% 8% 1% - -
64 RAFFERTY Catherine 27% 41% 24% 7% 1% - -
65 KEMLE Brian 1% 7% 23% 36% 25% 7% 1%
66 PAK Joel 7% 27% 36% 22% 7% 1% -
67 SEATON Jake 1% 10% 31% 37% 18% 4% -
68 RAJ Joshua - 6% 22% 35% 26% 9% 1%
69 ARNOLD Samuel 1% 13% 45% 31% 9% 1% -
70 HAYES Zackery 10% 32% 35% 18% 4% 1% -
71 PETE Landon 1% 7% 25% 38% 24% 5% -
72 ROBERTS Quinton 3% 17% 32% 30% 14% 3% -
74 RYU Nathaniel 4% 24% 39% 25% 7% 1% -
75 AGEE Brendon 45% 40% 13% 2% - - -
76 LU Chang 3% 15% 31% 32% 16% 3% -
77 JOO Jeremy - 4% 20% 43% 27% 5% -
78 KIM Minsung - 1% 11% 32% 37% 17% 3%
79 ALLEY Ellis 24% 49% 23% 4% - - -
80 STEWART Sarah 46% 39% 13% 2% - - -
80 BEVILACQUA Jacob 2% 14% 32% 33% 16% 3% -
82 SONG Nicholas 1% 9% 30% 39% 18% 3% -
83 GHOLSTON Alex 24% 40% 26% 9% 2% - -
83 PEREVORUKHOV Ivan 6% 30% 39% 20% 4% - -
85 COZMUTA Alexandra 9% 32% 37% 18% 4% - -
86 BASKIN Julia 25% 46% 24% 5% - - -
87 HWANG Eric 53% 36% 10% 1% - - -
87 HAAS Lindsey 4% 28% 39% 22% 6% 1% -
89 BERNSTEIN Leo 58% 35% 7% 1% - - -
90 ARMES Maggie 25% 42% 25% 7% 1% - -
91 MOY Eva 59% 33% 7% 1% - - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.