Georgia Tech Campus Recreation Center: Atlanta, GA - Atlanta, GA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | YANAMANDRA Sidhansh | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 41% | 11% | 1% |
| 2 | AHN Yuchan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 19% |
| 3 | LIU Dylan Y. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 57% | 17% |
| 3 | LENAHAN Conor J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 47% |
| 5 | YANG Maximus | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 33% | 5% |
| 6 | WOLF Christopher | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 45% | 12% |
| 7 | HAN Ethan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 44% | 9% |
| 8 | DEMAREE Adam | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 32% | 7% |
| 9 | JOHNSTON Kellan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 54% | 16% | 2% |
| 10 | SHAFRITZ Noah | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 23% | 4% |
| 11 | MCDANIEL Eamon | 100% | 99% | 86% | 51% | 16% | 3% | < 1% |
| 12 | NG Joshua Z. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 61% | 19% |
| 13 | FAN Yuchen | 100% | 99% | 86% | 51% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 14 | CHUNG Joseph | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 46% | 12% |
| 15 | FORD Tillman | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 49% | 17% | 3% |
| 16 | ILENRE Roni | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 33% | 9% | 1% |
| 17 | HONG Ryan | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 47% | 16% | 2% |
| 18 | CORLEY Avery | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 35% |
| 19 | ARUN Vikhyat | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 76% | 40% | 8% |
| 20 | WEDDLE Carson | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 14% | 2% |
| 21 | JUNG Elliot | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 49% | 15% | 2% |
| 22 | MAXWELL Austin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 60% | 21% |
| 23 | SINGH Siddhant | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 37% | 9% |
| 24 | FULLERTON Joshua D. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 25% |
| 25 | KOTHA Maanas | 100% | 100% | 93% | 68% | 30% | 7% | 1% |
| 26 | TUCKER Evan | 100% | 99% | 95% | 76% | 44% | 14% | 2% |
| 27 | SUNDQUIST Matthew | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 76% | 41% | 10% |
| 28 | BOLLE Elijah | 100% | 99% | 86% | 54% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 29 | PRICE Jordan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 42% | 11% |
| 30 | DECKER Carlton | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 45% | 12% |
| 31 | BERNSTEIN Matthew B. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 39% | 9% |
| 32 | NONKOOKETKHONG Pakon | 100% | 91% | 61% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 33 | LEE Daehyeon | 100% | 98% | 84% | 50% | 17% | 2% | < 1% |
| 34 | JOSEPH Matthew | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 71% | 36% | 8% |
| 35 | PULLEN Ayah | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 31% | 6% |
| 36 | HONG Robin | 100% | 97% | 73% | 31% | 5% | < 1% | - |
| 37 | CHOI David | 100% | 93% | 66% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 38 | LANGUASCO Michael | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 59% | 24% | 4% |
| 39 | BROWN Matt | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 44% | 13% | 1% |
| 40 | ADIBZADEH Mehrdad | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 33% | 7% |
| 40 | CORDOVA Colin | 100% | 99% | 88% | 57% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 40 | SOPER Adam | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 47% | 10% |
| 43 | BELL Adam | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 60% | 27% | 5% |
| 44 | ROBINSON Blake | 100% | 99% | 81% | 44% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 45 | JACKSON Viktoria | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 27% | 7% | 1% |
| 45 | JIN Dongwoo | 100% | 87% | 48% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 47 | PELLI Madeleine | 100% | 89% | 49% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 48 | KIM Sangone | 100% | 96% | 69% | 27% | 5% | - | - |
| 49 | SCHERNIKAU Jack | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 13% |
| 50 | WILLIAMS Eli | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 19% |
| 51 | PAEK sean | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 29% |
| 52 | KUCIA Michael | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 65% | 22% |
| 53 | BLAIR Hailey | 100% | 98% | 82% | 47% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 54 | CULLEN Reilly | 100% | 87% | 51% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
| 55 | ARZT Nicky | 100% | 97% | 74% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 56 | RASSEL John | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 34% | 10% | 1% |
| 57 | CARRIE Konnor | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 40% | 10% |
| 58 | FORSYTHE Hunter | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 60% | 26% | 5% |
| 59 | BANKS Lauren M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 57% | 19% | 2% |
| 60 | KARADENIZ Erek | 100% | 97% | 79% | 44% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 61 | HAMBRICK Addison | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 29% | 6% | - |
| 62 | CHOI Adam | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 52% | 16% | 2% |
| 63 | RAVITA Henry | 100% | 87% | 39% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 64 | RAFFERTY Catherine | 100% | 73% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 65 | KEMLE Brian | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 33% | 8% | 1% |
| 66 | PAK Joel | 100% | 93% | 66% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 67 | SEATON Jake | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 68 | RAJ Joshua | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 36% | 10% | 1% |
| 69 | ARNOLD Samuel | 100% | 99% | 86% | 41% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 70 | HAYES Zackery | 100% | 90% | 58% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 71 | PETE Landon | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 29% | 6% | - |
| 72 | ROBERTS Quinton | 100% | 97% | 80% | 48% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 74 | RYU Nathaniel | 100% | 96% | 71% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 75 | AGEE Brendon | 100% | 55% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 76 | LU Chang | 100% | 97% | 83% | 51% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 77 | JOO Jeremy | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 32% | 6% | - |
| 78 | KIM Minsung | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 56% | 19% | 3% |
| 79 | ALLEY Ellis | 100% | 76% | 27% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 80 | STEWART Sarah | 100% | 54% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 80 | BEVILACQUA Jacob | 100% | 98% | 84% | 52% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 82 | SONG Nicholas | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 83 | GHOLSTON Alex | 100% | 76% | 36% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 83 | PEREVORUKHOV Ivan | 100% | 94% | 63% | 25% | 5% | - | - |
| 85 | COZMUTA Alexandra | 100% | 91% | 59% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
| 86 | BASKIN Julia | 100% | 75% | 30% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 87 | HWANG Eric | 100% | 47% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 87 | HAAS Lindsey | 100% | 96% | 68% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 89 | BERNSTEIN Leo | 100% | 42% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 90 | ARMES Maggie | 100% | 75% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 91 | MOY Eva | 100% | 41% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.