Georgia Tech Campus Recreation Center: Atlanta, GA - Atlanta, GA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | XIAO Enoch A. | V V V V V V | V V V V V V | 5.9 | 6 | +0.1 |
2 | STUTCHBURY Carolina J. | V V V V V V | V V V V V D | 4.9 | 6 | +1.1 |
3 | XIAO Ethan J. | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 5.5 | 6 | +0.5 |
3 | TANG Owen S. | V V V V V | V V V V D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
5 | SONG Leonardo T. | V V V V V V | V V V D | 5.9 | 6 | +0.1 |
6 | STANLEY Mason B. | V V V V V V | V V V D | 5.8 | 6 | +0.2 |
7 | HUTH Mitchell | V V V V V V | V V V D | 5.0 | 6 | +1.0 |
8 | KIEL Christopher M. | V V V V V | V V D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
9 | LOVE Aaron | V V V V V V | V V | 5.5 | 6 | +0.5 |
10 | TIYA BIAYA K. | V V V V V | V V D | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 |
11 | OH SEAN | V V V V V | V V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
12 | VIVEROS Evan | V V V V V D | V V D | 5.0 | 5 | - |
13 | CHO Justin Y. | V V V D V V | V V D | 4.9 | 5 | +0.1 |
14 | ROSS III Paul D. | V V D V V V | V V D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
15 | SHAJI Karthik | V V V D V V | V V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
16 | LI Sophia M. | D V V V V | V V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
17 | WANG Brayden | D V V V V V | V D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
18 | ZOU Yuming | V V V V V D | V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
19 | WEBB Jacob T. | V V V D V V | V D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
20 | WOOLLEY Blake M. | D V V V V | V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
21 | BRUCE Roman | V D V V V | V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
22 | WILLIAMS Kenneth H. | D V V V V | V D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
23 | QIAN Jason H. | V V V D D V | V D | 4.7 | 4 | -0.7 |
24 | MONES Jesse | V V D V D V | V D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
25 | GOKCE Ellis | V D V V V D | V D | 1.6 | 4 | +2.4 |
26 | CHOWDHURY Arman | V V D V D V | V D | 2.2 | 4 | +1.8 |
27 | MAXWELL CJ F. | D V V V D V | V D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
28 | VIVEROS Oscar A. | V D V V D | V D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
29 | CURTIS William K. | V V D V D | V D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
30 | GITCEVICH Tatiana | D D D V V V | V D | 4.3 | 3 | -1.3 |
31 | HUTH Trevor | V V D V D D | V D | 4.0 | 3 | -1.0 |
32 | SPRINGFIELD Landon A. | D V D V V D | V D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
33 | LIAO Anthony J. | V V D V D | D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
34 | BELL Kenneth-John J. | V D V D V D | D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
35 | ELLINGTON Keegan A. | V D D V V D | D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
36 | EDWARDS Darby | D V D D V V | D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
37 | JOHNSON Soren | V D D V D V | D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
38 | TAN Isabella | V D D V V D | D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
39 | YANAMANDRA Sidhansh | D D V V D V | D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
40 | SUNDOWN Shaune-Anthony | V D D D V V | D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
41 | LEWIS Jared | V V D D D | D | 3.5 | 2 | -1.5 |
42 | VIVEROS Antonio | V D D D V | D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
43 | PAVLINEC John (Jack) C. | V V D D D | D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
44 | VINEL ALEKSANDR | D D D V V | D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
45 | ZHANG Bryan | D V V D D | D | 1.1 | 2 | +0.9 |
46 | PARSONS John | D D V D D V | D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
47 | DONG Emily | D D V V D D | D | 1.3 | 2 | +0.7 |
48 | FAN Yuchen | D V D V D D | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
49 | PARISH Levi | D D V D V D | D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
50 | MACK Jacob | D D D V D V | D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
51 | THIYAGARAJAA Ari | D D D D V | D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
52 | VASSALLO Angela | V D D D D | D | 0.3 | 1 | +0.7 |
53 | MILLETTE Brigid A. | D D V D D | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
54 | MCARTHUR Kemp | D D D D V | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
55 | BRUCE Naomi | D D V D D | D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
56 | LIU Elinda | V D D D D D | V D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
57 | URIBE LEON Sebastian | D V D D D D | V D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
58 | NELSEN Harrison | D V D D D D | V D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
59 | FROST Talon | D D D D D V | V D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
60 | BARRETT John | D D D D D V | V D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
61 | ISLAM Fahim | D D D V D D | V D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
62 | COUSINS Patrick | D D V D D D | V D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
63 | HO Ka Shuen | D V D D D D | V D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 |
64 | ERBEN Samuel | D D D D D | V D | 1.5 | 0 | -1.5 |
65 | HOLLOWAY-HOUCK Spencer | D D D V D D | D | 2.4 | 1 | -1.4 |
66 | BHAVSAR Kevin | D D D D V D | D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
67 | WHITE Kevin | D D D D D | D | 1.3 | 0 | -1.3 |
68 | HELSEL Amber E. | D D D D D D | D | 1.5 | 0 | -1.5 |
69 | BLACK Elias | D D D D D | D | 0.3 | 0 | -0.3 |
70 | MARKERT Meghan | D D D D D D | D | 0.7 | 0 | -0.7 |
71 | BIWANG Aeron | D D D D D D | D | 1.4 | 0 | -1.4 |
71 | LAKHEERAM Kyla | D D D D D D | D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 |
73 | DEPA Eva | D D D D D D | D | 1.5 | 0 | -1.5 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
---|---|---|---|
Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.