Milwaukee, WI - Milwaukee, WI, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | MACHULSKY Leehi | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 38% | 50% |
2 | DING Jiahe (Heidi) | - | - | - | - | 2% | 22% | 76% |
3 | LIN Katie Y. | - | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 39% | 21% |
3 | LEE Michelle J. | - | - | - | 3% | 16% | 42% | 39% |
5 | LEUNG Natalie | - | - | - | 4% | 17% | 41% | 38% |
6 | NELSON-LOVE Lily B. | - | - | 4% | 16% | 33% | 34% | 14% |
7 | CHAN Cheri K. | - | 3% | 18% | 36% | 32% | 11% | |
8 | PADHYE Tanishka | - | 4% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 13% | 2% |
9 | LIU Christina A. | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 37% | 25% | 5% |
10 | MEHROTRA Anya | - | - | 5% | 23% | 47% | 24% | |
11 | NING Emma | - | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 43% | 23% |
12 | LABRACHE Ella P. | - | 2% | 15% | 35% | 34% | 13% | 1% |
13 | LU Shiqi | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 6% |
14 | GHIDINA O'Livia G. | - | - | 3% | 17% | 45% | 36% | |
15 | GEBALA Natalie Brooke A. | - | 4% | 19% | 43% | 35% | ||
16 | HU Grace | - | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 45% | 23% |
17 | KUZNETSOV Victoria | - | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 39% | 18% |
18 | ZHANG Tina | - | - | 3% | 17% | 36% | 32% | 10% |
19 | CHIN Isabella | - | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 42% | 28% |
20 | REMEZA Alissa | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 38% | 20% | 4% |
21 | MCCUTCHEN Lauren (Lulu) | - | 1% | 9% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 5% |
22 | SEBASTIAN Felicity A. | - | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 44% | 26% |
23 | DROVETSKY Alexandra M. | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 9% |
24 | GAJJALA Sharika R. | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 36% | 18% | 1% |
25 | TEMIRYAEV Anna M. | 1% | 9% | 29% | 36% | 21% | 4% | |
26 | YU Nicole J. | - | 4% | 16% | 31% | 30% | 15% | 3% |
27 | DESAI Meera P. | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 36% | 16% | 2% |
28 | SMITH Grace L. | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 37% | 25% | 6% |
29 | GLASER Drew | - | 5% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
30 | FALLON Kyle R. | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 4% |
31 | GU Sarah | - | 1% | 10% | 32% | 41% | 16% | |
32 | CALDERA Lexi I. | - | 3% | 17% | 36% | 32% | 11% | |
33 | WADE-CURRIE Ava S. | - | 1% | 5% | 23% | 43% | 28% | |
34 | JAKEL Sophia N. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 28% | 44% | 21% |
35 | LAVERY Chloe K. | - | 3% | 14% | 30% | 32% | 17% | 4% |
36 | MALLAVARPU Aarthi C. | - | 3% | 15% | 31% | 32% | 16% | 3% |
37 | FILONOVA Alisa | 1% | 21% | 39% | 28% | 9% | 1% | |
38 | DANIEL Olivia | 3% | 18% | 38% | 32% | 8% | ||
39 | YANG Miranda (Yinuo) | - | - | 3% | 18% | 38% | 33% | 7% |
40 | LEE Sumin | - | - | 1% | 5% | 23% | 44% | 28% |
41 | SEMIKIN Julia | - | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 41% | 19% |
42 | WANG Nora | - | 2% | 9% | 24% | 34% | 24% | 7% |
43 | TAYLOR-CASAMAYOR Maia | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 7% |
44 | LUO Ashley | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 39% | 20% | 3% |
45 | HAFEEZ Hania | 5% | 26% | 40% | 24% | 5% | - | |
46 | CHIRASHNYA Noya | 7% | 29% | 40% | 21% | 4% | - | |
47 | REID Anousheh | - | 5% | 23% | 38% | 27% | 7% | |
48 | NGUYEN Kira | 2% | 12% | 31% | 34% | 17% | 4% | - |
49 | GORNOVSKY Abigail | 1% | 6% | 21% | 34% | 26% | 10% | 2% |
49 | XIAO Ruien | 1% | 8% | 25% | 34% | 24% | 8% | 1% |
51 | SHEN Stephanie | - | 2% | 13% | 31% | 34% | 17% | 3% |
52 | RUNIONS Emersyn | - | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 35% | 13% |
53 | CAPELLUA Mariasole | 6% | 27% | 40% | 23% | 4% | ||
54 | KIZILBASH Zara | 19% | 40% | 30% | 9% | 1% | ||
55 | DUMAS Marie | 7% | 36% | 38% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
56 | MUELLER Emma M. | 2% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 16% | 3% | - |
57 | MING Cynthia | 2% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 3% | - |
58 | BURN Lauren M. | - | 6% | 23% | 39% | 26% | 6% | |
59 | GUJJA Misha | 17% | 40% | 31% | 10% | 1% | - | |
60 | GUMAGAY Erika L. | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 32% | 12% | 1% |
61 | ELSTON Sophia | 3% | 19% | 38% | 29% | 10% | 1% | - |
62 | HONG Elaine | 2% | 18% | 37% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - |
63 | HAFEEZ Hiba | 3% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - |
64 | HU Chelsea | 13% | 38% | 35% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
65 | KIM Zoe L. | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 30% | 12% | 2% |
66 | PEHLIVANI Zara | 1% | 7% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 7% | - |
67 | SUN XiaoQi (Angelica) | - | - | 3% | 15% | 35% | 34% | 12% |
68 | LI Alisha | 7% | 31% | 39% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
69 | TAYLOR Kiera S. | - | 3% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 14% | 2% |
70 | RUMMEL Katherine E. | 11% | 33% | 35% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
71 | LIN Waiyuk | - | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 31% | 10% |
72 | HESS Heidi J. | 1% | 14% | 35% | 34% | 14% | 2% | - |
73 | ZHENG Linden | 21% | 40% | 28% | 9% | 2% | - | - |
73 | ALEXANDROV Katherine S. | - | 1% | 9% | 26% | 36% | 22% | 4% |
75 | YAO KATHARINE | 1% | 8% | 27% | 36% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
76 | DU Angela | 3% | 18% | 35% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - |
77 | MAO Amy | - | 4% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 12% | 1% |
78 | CHERNYSHOVA Victoria | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 33% | 12% | 1% |
79 | KNOX Alexia | 25% | 41% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
80 | SWENSON Nikita G. | 23% | 43% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - | |
81 | LIN Elaine | 42% | 41% | 14% | 2% | - | - | |
82 | CHERNIS Zoe C. | - | 1% | 8% | 23% | 34% | 25% | 7% |
83 | LI Suri | 2% | 17% | 36% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - |
84 | SMOTRITSKY Mia | 7% | 30% | 38% | 20% | 5% | - | - |
85 | LEACH Meka A. | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 38% | 21% | 4% |
85 | JOYAL Anne-Sophie | 9% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
87 | HOSANAGAR Inchara | 41% | 41% | 15% | 3% | - | - | - |
88 | PRIHODKO Nina | 23% | 46% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
89 | MONE Kylie | 40% | 41% | 16% | 3% | - | - | - |
90 | JAMES Josephine | 1% | 10% | 29% | 36% | 19% | 4% | - |
91 | RAUSCH Juliana | 2% | 13% | 36% | 34% | 13% | 2% | - |
92 | CHEN Quanyou Lisa | 74% | 24% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
93 | LEE Yedda | 2% | 16% | 33% | 31% | 14% | 3% | - |
94 | ZENG Katrina | 18% | 38% | 30% | 12% | 3% | - | - |
95 | CHANG Ella | 3% | 21% | 40% | 28% | 7% | 1% | |
96 | QURESHI Nisa | 3% | 21% | 39% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - |
97 | WU ALLYSON | 2% | 13% | 32% | 34% | 16% | 3% | - |
98 | BYBEE Lucy J. | 16% | 37% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
99 | YU Bailey | 15% | 36% | 31% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
100 | LIU Alice | 62% | 31% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
100 | MOON Seojung | 23% | 40% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
102 | BEEM Marin | 32% | 44% | 20% | 4% | - | - | - |
103 | NELSON Grace E. | 67% | 29% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
104 | GREGORY Aleksandra | 16% | 40% | 33% | 11% | 1% | ||
105 | HSU Adele Y. | 19% | 41% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
106 | MA ELISE | 5% | 24% | 40% | 25% | 6% | - | |
107 | KALE Anika A. | 2% | 12% | 29% | 33% | 19% | 5% | 1% |
108 | KOKES Ava | < 1% | 7% | 27% | 38% | 22% | 6% | - |
109 | SKOURLETOS Angelina | 3% | 18% | 35% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - |
110 | MACEY Hadley | 61% | 32% | 6% | 1% | - | - | - |
111 | GLICK Nina | 18% | 39% | 30% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
112 | MAMEDOVA Farah | 73% | 23% | 3% | - | - | - | |
113 | KRUMHOLZ Nicole | 33% | 45% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
114 | WITTER Catherine A. | 6% | 35% | 38% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.