Milwaukee, WI - Milwaukee, WI, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | LIN Audrey J. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 47% | 12% | |
2 | DELSOIN Chelsea C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 63% | 23% |
3 | DUBOIS Lauren N. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 41% | 10% |
3 | ANDRES Katherine A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 68% | 26% |
5 | PAUL Lila | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 45% | 10% |
6 | MARSEE Samantha | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 38% | 9% | |
7 | LU Amy | 100% | 86% | 48% | 15% | 2% | - | |
8 | HURST Kennedy | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 37% | 11% | 1% |
9 | SHOMAN Jenna | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 51% |
10 | PRIEUR Lauren | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 39% | 8% |
11 | ENGELMAN Madeline A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 28% | |
12 | XU Ellen | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 42% | 11% | |
13 | HILD Nisha | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 53% | 21% | 3% |
14 | WIGGERS Susan Q. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 25% |
15 | DUCKETT Madison | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 26% | 4% | |
16 | KONG Carys H. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 58% | 24% | 4% |
17 | CHIOLDI Mina | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 29% |
18 | BLUM Leah I. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 41% |
19 | MIKA Veronica | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 35% | 8% |
20 | CODY Alexandra C. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 16% | |
20 | FANG Victoria W. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 37% | 8% | |
22 | ROMAGNOLI Isabella | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 41% | 9% | |
23 | BUHAY Rachel T. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 30% | 6% | |
24 | SINHA Anika | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 33% | 7% | |
25 | BEVACQUA Aria F. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 45% | 13% | 1% |
26 | HOLMES Emma | 100% | 89% | 57% | 22% | 5% | - | - |
27 | SCALAMONI-GOLDSTEIN Charlotte S. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 45% | 11% | |
28 | CHIANG Emily | 100% | 92% | 64% | 27% | 6% | 1% | |
29 | GRAFF Sophie | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 42% | 13% | 2% |
30 | GHAYALOD reya | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 53% | 19% | 3% |
31 | WEI Vivian W. | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 24% | 5% | - |
32 | JEAN Olympe G. | 100% | 100% | 92% | 56% | 18% | 3% | - |
33 | ALCEBAR Kayla | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 46% | 11% |
34 | HUNG Anna | 100% | 97% | 82% | 51% | 20% | 4% | - |
35 | SUBRAMANIAN Nitika | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 58% | 24% | 4% |
36 | GORMAN Victoria M. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 38% | 12% | 2% |
37 | LESSARD-KULCHYSKI Khloé | 100% | 95% | 72% | 37% | 11% | 2% | - |
38 | JULIEN Michelle | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 26% | 4% | |
39 | MCMAHON Byronie | 100% | 61% | 20% | 4% | - | - | |
40 | CHEN Xinyan | 100% | 97% | 78% | 40% | 11% | 1% | |
41 | NATHANSON Sammy E. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 34% | 6% |
42 | YANG Ashley M. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 62% | 28% | 6% |
43 | PENG Florella | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 40% | 12% | 2% |
44 | CZEKAJEWSKA Sonia M. | 100% | 93% | 62% | 24% | 5% | - | - |
45 | TABANGAY Heartlyn | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 58% | 25% | 5% |
46 | LU Elaine | 100% | 100% | 99% | 85% | 48% | 14% | 2% |
47 | BALAKUMARAN Maya | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 49% | 18% | 3% |
48 | RIZKALA Joanna | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 43% | 11% | |
49 | LIGH Erenei J. | 100% | 97% | 81% | 48% | 16% | 2% | |
50 | PASHIN Anna | 100% | 95% | 67% | 28% | 6% | - | |
51 | LI Amanda C. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 16% | |
52 | YANG Angelina | 100% | 97% | 80% | 46% | 15% | 2% | |
53 | ADAMS Morrigan B. | 100% | 71% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - | |
54 | WANG Jianning | 100% | 70% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - | |
55 | TODD Phoebe | 100% | 91% | 59% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - |
56 | SATHE Mehek S. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 46% | 16% | 2% |
57 | SHI Cathleen | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 39% | 10% | 1% |
58 | PLONKA Kaley V. | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 19% | 3% | - |
59 | NG Sarah W. | 100% | 89% | 57% | 22% | 5% | - | - |
60 | SOURIMTO Valeria | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 28% | 6% | |
61 | ANDRES Charmaine G. | 100% | 99% | 87% | 57% | 23% | 4% | |
62 | ERIKSON Kira R. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 47% | 15% | 2% |
63 | LI Angela | 100% | 59% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
64 | YEN Natalie | 100% | 87% | 55% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - |
65 | MUNGOVAN Cecilia C. | 100% | 89% | 57% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - |
66 | BOLTON Eleksi M. | 100% | 90% | 57% | 22% | 5% | - | - |
67 | FU Linqian (Helen) | 100% | 92% | 64% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
68 | VADASZ Ibla P. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 59% | 23% | 4% | |
69 | NATH Trisha | 100% | 88% | 54% | 19% | 3% | - | |
70 | LEE Sophia | 100% | 82% | 44% | 13% | 2% | - | |
71 | MORAN Rhea | 100% | 77% | 37% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
72 | LIAO Siwen | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 23% | 4% | - |
73 | STREU Mirabel | 100% | 68% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
74 | JAVERI Amaya | 100% | 58% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
75 | CRUZ Sonia | 100% | 70% | 26% | 5% | - | - | - |
76 | WHALEN Paige C. | 100% | 96% | 74% | 38% | 11% | 1% | |
77 | OGANEZOVA Valerie | 100% | 50% | 12% | 1% | - | - | |
78 | ALTIRS Kate | 100% | 93% | 68% | 33% | 10% | 1% | - |
78 | ZENG Megan | 100% | 50% | 7% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.