Milwaukee, WI - Milwaukee, WI, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LIN Audrey J. | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 34% | 12% | |
| 2 | DELSOIN Chelsea C. | - | - | 2% | 9% | 27% | 40% | 23% |
| 3 | DUBOIS Lauren N. | - | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 32% | 10% |
| 3 | ANDRES Katherine A. | - | - | - | 6% | 25% | 43% | 26% |
| 5 | PAUL Lila | - | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 35% | 10% |
| 6 | MARSEE Samantha | 1% | 5% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 9% | |
| 7 | LU Amy | 14% | 38% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 8 | HURST Kennedy | 1% | 7% | 22% | 33% | 26% | 10% | 1% |
| 9 | SHOMAN Jenna | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 38% | 51% |
| 10 | PRIEUR Lauren | - | - | 3% | 19% | 39% | 31% | 8% |
| 11 | ENGELMAN Madeline A. | - | 1% | 5% | 23% | 43% | 28% | |
| 12 | XU Ellen | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 31% | 11% | |
| 13 | HILD Nisha | - | 3% | 14% | 29% | 32% | 17% | 3% |
| 14 | WIGGERS Susan Q. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 41% | 25% |
| 15 | DUCKETT Madison | 1% | 8% | 28% | 38% | 22% | 4% | |
| 16 | KONG Carys H. | - | 2% | 12% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 4% |
| 17 | CHIOLDI Mina | - | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 41% | 29% |
| 18 | BLUM Leah I. | - | - | - | 2% | 15% | 42% | 41% |
| 19 | MIKA Veronica | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 8% |
| 20 | CODY Alexandra C. | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 38% | 16% | |
| 20 | FANG Victoria W. | 1% | 6% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 8% | |
| 22 | ROMAGNOLI Isabella | - | 4% | 19% | 36% | 31% | 9% | |
| 23 | BUHAY Rachel T. | 1% | 8% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 6% | |
| 24 | SINHA Anika | 1% | 7% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 7% | |
| 25 | BEVACQUA Aria F. | - | 3% | 17% | 35% | 32% | 12% | 1% |
| 26 | HOLMES Emma | 11% | 32% | 35% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 27 | SCALAMONI-GOLDSTEIN Charlotte S. | - | 3% | 16% | 36% | 34% | 11% | |
| 28 | CHIANG Emily | 8% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 5% | 1% | |
| 29 | GRAFF Sophie | - | 4% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 11% | 2% |
| 30 | GHAYALOD reya | - | 2% | 13% | 31% | 34% | 16% | 3% |
| 31 | WEI Vivian W. | 2% | 12% | 29% | 33% | 19% | 5% | - |
| 32 | JEAN Olympe G. | - | 7% | 37% | 38% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 33 | ALCEBAR Kayla | - | - | 2% | 15% | 37% | 35% | 11% |
| 34 | HUNG Anna | 3% | 15% | 31% | 31% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 35 | SUBRAMANIAN Nitika | - | 2% | 12% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 4% |
| 36 | GORMAN Victoria M. | - | 6% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 10% | 2% |
| 37 | LESSARD-KULCHYSKI Khloé | 5% | 22% | 35% | 26% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 38 | JULIEN Michelle | 1% | 9% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 4% | |
| 39 | MCMAHON Byronie | 39% | 41% | 17% | 3% | - | - | |
| 40 | CHEN Xinyan | 3% | 19% | 38% | 30% | 10% | 1% | |
| 41 | NATHANSON Sammy E. | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 38% | 28% | 6% |
| 42 | YANG Ashley M. | - | 2% | 10% | 26% | 35% | 22% | 6% |
| 43 | PENG Florella | 1% | 6% | 21% | 33% | 27% | 11% | 2% |
| 44 | CZEKAJEWSKA Sonia M. | 7% | 30% | 39% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 45 | TABANGAY Heartlyn | - | 2% | 12% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 5% |
| 46 | LU Elaine | - | 1% | 14% | 37% | 34% | 12% | 2% |
| 47 | BALAKUMARAN Maya | - | 4% | 16% | 31% | 31% | 15% | 3% |
| 48 | RIZKALA Joanna | - | 4% | 17% | 36% | 32% | 11% | |
| 49 | LIGH Erenei J. | 3% | 16% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 2% | |
| 50 | PASHIN Anna | 5% | 28% | 39% | 22% | 6% | - | |
| 51 | LI Amanda C. | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 38% | 16% | |
| 52 | YANG Angelina | 3% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 2% | |
| 53 | ADAMS Morrigan B. | 29% | 41% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 54 | WANG Jianning | 30% | 43% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - | |
| 55 | TODD Phoebe | 9% | 32% | 35% | 18% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 56 | SATHE Mehek S. | - | 4% | 17% | 32% | 30% | 14% | 2% |
| 57 | SHI Cathleen | - | 4% | 20% | 37% | 29% | 9% | 1% |
| 58 | PLONKA Kaley V. | 2% | 13% | 33% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 59 | NG Sarah W. | 11% | 32% | 35% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 60 | SOURIMTO Valeria | 1% | 9% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 6% | |
| 61 | ANDRES Charmaine G. | 1% | 12% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 4% | |
| 62 | ERIKSON Kira R. | - | 4% | 16% | 33% | 32% | 13% | 2% |
| 63 | LI Angela | 41% | 42% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 64 | YEN Natalie | 13% | 33% | 33% | 17% | 4% | 1% | - |
| 65 | MUNGOVAN Cecilia C. | 11% | 32% | 34% | 18% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 66 | BOLTON Eleksi M. | 10% | 33% | 36% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
| 67 | FU Linqian (Helen) | 8% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 68 | VADASZ Ibla P. | 1% | 10% | 30% | 36% | 19% | 4% | |
| 69 | NATH Trisha | 12% | 34% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - | |
| 70 | LEE Sophia | 18% | 39% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - | |
| 71 | MORAN Rhea | 23% | 40% | 27% | 9% | 2% | - | - |
| 72 | LIAO Siwen | 2% | 11% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 73 | STREU Mirabel | 32% | 56% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 74 | JAVERI Amaya | 42% | 41% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 75 | CRUZ Sonia | 30% | 44% | 21% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 76 | WHALEN Paige C. | 4% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 1% | |
| 77 | OGANEZOVA Valerie | 50% | 38% | 11% | 1% | - | - | |
| 78 | ALTIRS Kate | 7% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 78 | ZENG Megan | 50% | 43% | 7% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.