Fairfax Challenge ROC, RJCC, RYC

Veteran Men’s Foil (VETMF)

Friday, January 2, 2026 at 2:30 PM

Register

Fredericksburg Convention Center - Fredericksburg, VA

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 2385 2664 - 2192
5 - 8 1807 2015 - 1650
9 - 16 1502 1651 - 1121
17 - 24 1083 2040 - 550

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 Sheynkman, Leon Blue Ridge Fencing Center D25 2356 1983.05
2 Nacu, Robert LA International Fencing C25 2664 1881.45
3 Tomasi, John Smokey Mountain Fencing D25 2192 1860.87
4 Frenzinger, Douglas AZ United Fencing Club D25 2329 1692.43
5 Rusanov, Oleg Royal Fencing Academy D22 1904 1610.11
6 Mahnken, Thomas Fencing Sports Academy, Inc. C25 1658 1355.93
7 Lung, Po nam Research Triangle Fencing U 2015 1267.19
8 Bazzle, Christopher Charlotte Fencing Academy U 1650 1125.15
9 Newell, Tim Bayou City Fencing Academy E25 1388 1089.21
10 Lee, Hans OnTarget Fencing Club D25 1401 1032.13
11 Wu, Geoffrey OnTarget Fencing Club U 1628 982.37
12 Crowe, Nathan Rockville Fencing Academy E25 1573 918.02
13 Buchanan, Jonah Rockville Fencing Academy E25 1651 824.23
14 Stadther, Christopher Rockville Fencing Academy U 1638 813.40
15 Chao, Pierre Rockville Fencing Academy U 1121 647.70
16 Dover, Felix Forge Fencing Teams DUR U 1618 644.86
17 Zaidi, Sohail OnTarget Fencing Club U 1166 544.32
18 Leung, Ricky U 2040 315.51
19 Rogers, Windell Nova Fencing Club U 1038 252.28
20 Chandlee, Thomas Rockville Fencing Academy U 1020 154.87
21 Galvan, Ivan OnTarget Fencing Club U 1018 24.44
22 Jenkins, Michael Fencers Club Inc. U 550 < 0
23 Chandlee, Richard (Rick) Calvert-Arundel Fencers U 859 < 0
24 Botwinick, Nelson Fencers Club Inc. U 973 < 0

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!