Fairfax Challenge ROC, RJCC, RYC

Veteran Men’s Foil (VETMF)

Friday, January 2, 2026 at 2:30 PM

Register

Fredericksburg Convention Center - Fredericksburg, VA

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 2462 2970 - 2104
5 - 8 1828 2366 - 1373
9 - 16 1547 1916 - 1099
17 - 24 1139 1728 - 575

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 Nacu, Robert LA International Fencing C25 2970 2029.53
2 Sheynkman, Leon Blue Ridge Fencing Center D25 2345 1930.05
3 Derby, Joshua Rockville Fencing Academy C25 2430 1896.14
4 Tomasi, John Smokey Mountain Fencing D25 2104 1753.41
5 Rusanov, Oleg Royal Fencing Academy D22 1915 1620.42
6 Frenzinger, Douglas AZ United Fencing Club D25 2366 1455.72
7 Mahnken, Thomas Fencing Sports Academy, Inc. C25 1658 1351.98
8 Newell, Tim Bayou City Fencing Academy E25 1373 1065.96
9 Lee, Hans OnTarget Fencing Club D25 1391 1004.11
10 Stadther, Christopher Rockville Fencing Academy U 1916 966.62
11 Crowe, Nathan Rockville Fencing Academy E25 1581 905.97
12 Bazzle, Christopher Charlotte Fencing Academy U 1527 890.71
13 Wu, Geoffrey OnTarget Fencing Club U 1475 776.18
14 Lung, Po nam Research Triangle Fencing U 1737 729.63
15 Buchanan, Jonah Rockville Fencing Academy E25 1648 710.66
16 Chao, Pierre Rockville Fencing Academy U 1099 613.57
17 Zaidi, Sohail OnTarget Fencing Club U 1141 478.96
18 Dover, Felix Forge Fencing Teams DUR U 1728 470.11
19 Rogers, Windell Nova Fencing Club U 1102 277.23
20 Galvan, Ivan OnTarget Fencing Club U 1129 53.73
21 Chandlee, Thomas Rockville Fencing Academy U 966 < 0
22 Jenkins, Michael Fencers Club Inc. U 575 < 0
23 Chandlee, Richard (Rick) Calvert-Arundel Fencers U 1257 < 0
24 Botwinick, Nelson Fencers Club Inc. U 1211 < 0

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!