GRAFA RYC\RJCC\ROC- Third Coast Cup

Cadet Men’s Epee (CDTME)

Saturday, November 8, 2025 at 12:00 PM

Register

MSA Fieldhouse - GRAND RAPIDS, MI

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 2176 2549 - 2000
5 - 8 1953 2418 - 1711
9 - 16 1588 1766 - 1396
17 - 27 1468 2500 - 874

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 Kim, Gene Olympian Fencing Club B25 2549 2285.93
2 zhang, jonathan Ataba Fencing Club C25 2130 1841.61
3 Ellis, IV, Floyd NKY Fencing Academy (NKFA) E25 2023 1726.93
4 Bagdonas, Olivier Windy City Fencing-Chicago B25 2000 1712.81
5 Perry, Noah Escrime Du Lac E25 1891 1594.65
6 Wychulis, Tristan Red Door Fencing U 2418 1593.82
7 Purushotham, Neil Peoria Fencing Academy U 1711 1407.50
8 Streeter, Oliver Grand Rapids Fencing Academy E25 1792 1394.31
9 D'Sa, Thomas Peoria Fencing Academy E25 1766 1381.04
10 Larson, Vaughn Grand Rapids Fencing Academy E25 1751 1353.96
11 Goodman, Liam Windy City Fencing-Chicago E25 1682 1336.31
12 Shaffer, Tyler Windy City Fencing-Chicago D25 1523 1210.50
13 Painter, Landon Peoria Fencing Academy D25 1624 1059.86
14 Saylor, Henry Traverse City Fencing Club D25 1529 965.88
15 Lee, Wilson Center for Blade Arts U 1433 912.84
16 Frank, Luke Indianapolis Fencing Club U 1396 884.19
17 Brougham, Brice Grand Rapids Fencing Academy U 1460 850.00
18 Zalpuri, Zorin Indianapolis Fencing Club U 1265 826.02
19 Jerdee, Colton Traverse City Fencing Club C25 1308 780.95
20 Sanford, Wesley Center for Blade Arts E24 1376 774.87
21 Peng, Ethan U 1350 668.54
22 Drawz, Chase Center for Blade Arts E25 1393 564.21
23 Shi, Yeyu U 1800 482.66
24 Yates, Graeme Center for Blade Arts D25 1502 372.77
25 Nelson, Langston Royal Arts Fencing Academy U 1321 194.16
26 Ungemah, Edison Twin Cities Fencing Club U 2500 < 0
27 Meiser, Charlie Grand Rapids Fencing Academy U 874 < 0

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!