GRAFA RYC\RJCC\ROC- Third Coast Cup

Division III Men’s Foil (DV3MF)

Saturday, November 8, 2025 at 3:30 PM

Register

MSA Fieldhouse - GRAND RAPIDS, MI

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 1988 2161 - 1865
5 - 8 1771 1800 - 1707
9 - 16 1572 1880 - 1471
17 - 22 1271 1780 - 1047

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 Arata, Connor Cleveland State Univ. NCAA D25 2161 1834.87
2 McMillian, Harrison Heartland Fencing Academy D25 2006 1688.45
3 Heyboer, Jason Grand Rapids Fencing Academy D24 1920 1623.23
4 Nazario, Dominic Plymouth/Ann Arbor Fencing Academy D25 1865 1560.78
5 Zhao, Jason Grand Rapids Fencing Academy D25 1778 1498.14
6 Zinser, James South YEL Fencing Alliance D25 1799 1474.10
7 Symmank, Callen Twin Cities Fencing Club D25 1707 1396.48
8 Hastings, Alex Heartland Fencing Academy E25 1800 1371.45
9 Davis, Benjamin Bronzeville Fencing Academy E25 1606 1219.54
10 Wang, Freyr Renaissance Fencing Club U 1504 1162.43
11 Feehan, Conor Youth Enrichment League Fencing Club E25 1508 1160.23
12 DiFrank, Tae Youth Enrichment League Fencing Club E25 1471 1130.49
13 Ryan, Nash Royal Arts Fencing Academy D25 1570 1128.30
14 Ni, Aaric Grand Rapids Fencing Academy E25 1548 1100.60
15 Chase, Crosby Grand Rapids Fencing Academy U 1491 1089.00
16 Williams, Christopher Grand Rapids Fencing Academy U 1880 1050.27
17 Misioura, Mark Fencing Center Of Chicago U 1780 751.98
18 Hickner, Gabe U. Of Minnesota E25 1236 735.30
19 Deng, Albert Plymouth/Ann Arbor Fencing Academy U 1095 639.85
20 Kolacki, Gabriel Grand Rapids Fencing Academy U 1052 608.32
21 Terpstra, Clive Grand Rapids Fencing Academy U 1047 7.94
22 Ungemah, Joseph Twin Cities Fencing Club U 1416 < 0

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!