GRAFA RYC\RJCC\ROC- Third Coast Cup

Junior Men’s Foil (JNRMF)

Sunday, November 9, 2025 at 8:00 AM

Register

MSA Fieldhouse - GRAND RAPIDS, MI

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 2217 2280 - 2141
5 - 8 2072 2161 - 1898
9 - 16 1736 1920 - 1504
17 - 24 1241 1570 - 655

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 VanOyen, Dominick Plymouth/Ann Arbor Fencing Academy B24 2280 2022.09
2 Ge, Felix Fei Renaissance Fencing Club C25 2255 2000.99
3 Diepstra, Jeremy Bay Regional Fencing Alliance C25 2192 1894.17
4 Fang, Haoyu Renaissance Fencing Club C25 2141 1888.24
5 Kue, Temujin Grand Rapids Fencing Academy B24 2133 1871.39
6 Arata, Connor Cleveland State Univ. NCAA D25 2161 1834.87
7 Toews, Jackson Youth Enrichment League Fencing Club B25 2098 1819.33
8 LaTorre, Leonardo Renaissance Fencing Club D25 1898 1635.94
9 Heyboer, Jason Grand Rapids Fencing Academy D24 1920 1623.23
10 Nazario, Dominic Plymouth/Ann Arbor Fencing Academy D25 1865 1560.78
11 Mavani, Krishna Renaissance Fencing Club C24 1832 1552.71
12 Dunlap, Ian Ohio Fencing Center C24 1855 1542.87
13 Zinser, James South YEL Fencing Alliance D25 1799 1474.10
14 Davis, Benjamin Bronzeville Fencing Academy E25 1606 1219.54
15 Wang, Freyr Renaissance Fencing Club U 1504 1162.43
16 Feehan, Conor Youth Enrichment League Fencing Club E25 1508 1160.23
17 DiFrank, Tae Youth Enrichment League Fencing Club E25 1471 1130.49
18 Ryan, Nash Royal Arts Fencing Academy D25 1570 1128.30
19 Ni, Aaric Grand Rapids Fencing Academy E25 1548 1100.60
20 Chase, Crosby Grand Rapids Fencing Academy U 1491 1089.00
21 Deng, Albert Plymouth/Ann Arbor Fencing Academy U 1095 639.85
22 Kolacki, Gabriel Grand Rapids Fencing Academy U 1052 608.32
23 Terpstra, Clive Grand Rapids Fencing Academy U 1047 7.94
24 Untereker, Billy Youth Enrichment League Fencing Club U 655 < 0

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!