Parsippany, NJ - Parsippany, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
1 | KOMAR Sofia | - | 6% | 27% | 41% | 22% | 3% |
2 | LIN Jessica Y. | - | - | 2% | 16% | 42% | 40% |
3 | LAWSON Marie A. | 9% | 31% | 37% | 19% | 4% | - |
3 | NI Emma | 1% | 9% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 4% |
5 | GAO Emily L. | - | - | 4% | 19% | 42% | 34% |
6 | SZTAN Maria | 1% | 10% | 30% | 37% | 19% | 3% |
7 | DROVETSKY Alexandra M. | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 42% | 26% |
8 | KIM Diane E. | 12% | 35% | 35% | 15% | 3% | - |
9 | GANDHI Sedna S. | - | 1% | 9% | 32% | 43% | 16% |
10 | PATURU Meghana | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 34% | 13% |
11 | HAN Jaewon(Leah) | - | 5% | 22% | 39% | 28% | 6% |
12 | LIN Katie Y. | - | 1% | 5% | 24% | 45% | 25% |
13 | YOON Julia J. | 4% | 20% | 37% | 30% | 9% | |
14 | BINDAS Blodwen S. | 1% | 6% | 25% | 40% | 24% | 5% |
15 | IGOE Nirali B. | 3% | 18% | 36% | 32% | 10% | |
16 | SMUK Daria A. | 1% | 7% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 5% |
17 | KULKARNI Diya | - | - | - | 5% | 31% | 63% |
18 | ZHANG Maya | 2% | 13% | 32% | 35% | 16% | 3% |
19 | SHOATES Jacqueline A. | - | - | 1% | 10% | 40% | 49% |
20 | DESAMOURS Sabine I. | - | - | 2% | 17% | 44% | 37% |
20 | WANG Yumin | 1% | 6% | 22% | 36% | 28% | 8% |
22 | MARCHANT Sandra M. | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 41% | 21% |
23 | LONG Cindy | - | - | 4% | 26% | 52% | 18% |
24 | SAFKO Liubov V. | - | 6% | 25% | 40% | 25% | 5% |
25 | KOWALSKY Rachel A. | 1% | 14% | 41% | 36% | 8% | - |
26 | KANG Dahyun | - | 5% | 19% | 35% | 31% | 10% |
27 | HUH Anna | 6% | 26% | 39% | 24% | 5% | |
28 | ZHAO Yingying | 7% | 29% | 40% | 21% | 4% | - |
29 | SIDDIQUI Ammna K. | 4% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 12% | 2% |
30 | MINASSIAN Arianna M. | 13% | 34% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - |
31 | BENATER Lauren | 2% | 19% | 37% | 29% | 11% | 1% |
32 | RABEL Brenna V. | 19% | 41% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - |
33 | YAO Jillian | 1% | 10% | 29% | 37% | 19% | 3% |
34 | SIBLEY Elisabeth J. | 3% | 26% | 41% | 24% | 5% | - |
35 | YU Claire | 24% | 45% | 25% | 5% | - | - |
36 | GANSER Yuliya | 6% | 25% | 38% | 25% | 6% | |
37 | QUINLAN Nicole P. | 3% | 20% | 38% | 30% | 9% | 1% |
38 | MIDGLEY Janice M. | 5% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
39 | TOMASELLO Olivia E. | 12% | 36% | 36% | 14% | 2% | - |
39 | MA Laura | 21% | 44% | 28% | 7% | - | - |
41 | XU Amy | 39% | 41% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
42 | MCGEE Sophia | - | 5% | 24% | 42% | 26% | 2% |
43 | SLACKMAN Valerie | 9% | 30% | 36% | 20% | 5% | - |
44 | DOUGLAS Julia F. | 2% | 14% | 37% | 34% | 12% | 1% |
45 | SAAL Anna | 2% | 16% | 37% | 33% | 11% | 1% |
46 | TOLBA Salma | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 41% | 19% |
47 | NICOU Nicole | 14% | 36% | 34% | 14% | 2% | |
48 | LEE Olive | 1% | 9% | 30% | 40% | 19% | 1% |
49 | ROWLAND May | 45% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
50 | CHAN Elizabeth | 2% | 13% | 32% | 35% | 16% | 3% |
51 | SHI Angela L. | 19% | 41% | 30% | 9% | 1% | - |
52 | HERNANDEZ Christy | 24% | 44% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
53 | NIEMEYER Jennifer A. | - | 9% | 30% | 38% | 20% | 4% |
54 | PARTE Isabella B. | 7% | 29% | 38% | 21% | 5% | - |
55 | MAO Amy | 16% | 41% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - |
56 | ADVINCULA Anabella E. | 13% | 44% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - |
57 | MASTRONARDI Laura | 4% | 22% | 38% | 28% | 8% | 1% |
58 | MOK Chloe R. | 29% | 46% | 21% | 3% | - | - |
59 | LONGSTREET Olivia | 41% | 44% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.