Parsippany, NJ - Parsippany, NJ, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1 | KOMAR Sofia | 100% | 100% | 93% | 66% | 25% | 3% |
| 2 | LIN Jessica Y. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 40% |
| 3 | LAWSON Marie A. | 100% | 91% | 60% | 23% | 4% | - |
| 3 | NI Emma | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 26% | 4% |
| 5 | GAO Emily L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 34% |
| 6 | SZTAN Maria | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 22% | 3% |
| 7 | DROVETSKY Alexandra M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 26% |
| 8 | KIM Diane E. | 100% | 88% | 53% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 9 | GANDHI Sedna S. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 59% | 16% |
| 10 | PATURU Meghana | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 47% | 13% |
| 11 | HAN Jaewon(Leah) | 100% | 100% | 94% | 73% | 34% | 6% |
| 12 | LIN Katie Y. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 70% | 25% |
| 13 | YOON Julia J. | 100% | 96% | 76% | 39% | 9% | |
| 14 | BINDAS Blodwen S. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 28% | 5% |
| 15 | IGOE Nirali B. | 100% | 97% | 79% | 43% | 10% | |
| 16 | SMUK Daria A. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 28% | 5% |
| 17 | KULKARNI Diya | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 63% |
| 18 | ZHANG Maya | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 19% | 3% |
| 19 | SHOATES Jacqueline A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 49% |
| 20 | DESAMOURS Sabine I. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 81% | 37% |
| 20 | WANG Yumin | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 36% | 8% |
| 22 | MARCHANT Sandra M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 21% |
| 23 | LONG Cindy | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 70% | 18% |
| 24 | SAFKO Liubov V. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 69% | 30% | 5% |
| 25 | KOWALSKY Rachel A. | 100% | 99% | 85% | 44% | 8% | - |
| 26 | KANG Dahyun | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 41% | 10% |
| 27 | HUH Anna | 100% | 94% | 68% | 30% | 5% | |
| 28 | ZHAO Yingying | 100% | 93% | 64% | 24% | 4% | - |
| 29 | SIDDIQUI Ammna K. | 100% | 96% | 79% | 44% | 14% | 2% |
| 30 | MINASSIAN Arianna M. | 100% | 87% | 53% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 31 | BENATER Lauren | 100% | 98% | 78% | 41% | 12% | 1% |
| 32 | RABEL Brenna V. | 100% | 81% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 33 | YAO Jillian | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 22% | 3% |
| 34 | SIBLEY Elisabeth J. | 100% | 97% | 70% | 29% | 5% | - |
| 35 | YU Claire | 100% | 76% | 31% | 6% | - | - |
| 36 | GANSER Yuliya | 100% | 94% | 69% | 31% | 6% | |
| 37 | QUINLAN Nicole P. | 100% | 97% | 77% | 39% | 10% | 1% |
| 38 | MIDGLEY Janice M. | 100% | 95% | 70% | 32% | 8% | 1% |
| 39 | TOMASELLO Olivia E. | 100% | 88% | 53% | 17% | 2% | - |
| 39 | MA Laura | 100% | 79% | 35% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 41 | XU Amy | 100% | 61% | 20% | 3% | - | - |
| 42 | MCGEE Sophia | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 28% | 2% |
| 43 | SLACKMAN Valerie | 100% | 91% | 61% | 25% | 5% | - |
| 44 | DOUGLAS Julia F. | 100% | 98% | 84% | 47% | 13% | 1% |
| 45 | SAAL Anna | 100% | 98% | 82% | 45% | 13% | 1% |
| 46 | TOLBA Salma | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 19% |
| 47 | NICOU Nicole | 100% | 86% | 50% | 16% | 2% | |
| 48 | LEE Olive | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 20% | 1% |
| 49 | ROWLAND May | 100% | 55% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 50 | CHAN Elizabeth | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 19% | 3% |
| 51 | SHI Angela L. | 100% | 81% | 40% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 52 | HERNANDEZ Christy | 100% | 76% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 53 | NIEMEYER Jennifer A. | 100% | 100% | 91% | 61% | 23% | 4% |
| 54 | PARTE Isabella B. | 100% | 93% | 64% | 26% | 6% | - |
| 55 | MAO Amy | 100% | 84% | 42% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 56 | ADVINCULA Anabella E. | 100% | 87% | 43% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 57 | MASTRONARDI Laura | 100% | 96% | 74% | 36% | 9% | 1% |
| 58 | MOK Chloe R. | 100% | 71% | 25% | 4% | - | - |
| 59 | LONGSTREET Olivia | 100% | 59% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.