Indianapolis Fencing Club - Indianapolis, IN, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | RIPLEY Ian | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 37% | 15% | |
2 | BOLARIN Oluwatosin N. | - | - | - | 2% | 12% | 39% | 47% |
3 | PAMERLEAU Ian | 2% | 14% | 33% | 33% | 16% | 3% | |
3 | TARR Robert | - | 3% | 18% | 39% | 32% | 8% | |
5 | KRAJ Pawel | - | 3% | 18% | 36% | 32% | 10% | |
6 | SON Eric | - | 2% | 12% | 33% | 38% | 16% | |
7 | GUILFORD Corey | - | 3% | 18% | 38% | 32% | 9% | |
8 | SOARE Maria Elena | 7% | 24% | 34% | 25% | 9% | 1% | - |
9 | THOMAS Samuel | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 40% | 19% | |
10 | KRAVITZ Sarah | 6% | 23% | 34% | 25% | 10% | 2% | - |
11 | STENNIS Brendan | 1% | 13% | 36% | 34% | 14% | 2% | |
12 | BRENNEMAN Adam | - | 8% | 28% | 38% | 20% | 4% | - |
13 | REED Dusty (Allen) | - | 3% | 16% | 37% | 34% | 11% | |
14 | LAUER Michael | - | 1% | 10% | 33% | 40% | 16% | |
15 | SORG Jacqueline C. | 6% | 27% | 38% | 23% | 6% | 1% | |
16 | MILLER Brent | - | 5% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 9% | 1% |
17 | WANG Peter | 1% | 9% | 32% | 39% | 17% | 3% | |
18 | LAI Yat Hay Casper | 2% | 22% | 40% | 27% | 8% | 1% | |
19 | FANG Samuel | - | 9% | 45% | 35% | 10% | 1% | |
20 | DVORAK Ryan | - | 1% | 9% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 5% |
21 | YANG Seung Joo | 60% | 33% | 6% | 1% | - | - | |
22 | MILLER Hayden | 3% | 25% | 43% | 23% | 5% | - | |
23 | BESEL Natalie | 59% | 35% | 5% | - | - | - | |
24 | SWEETS Aidan | 81% | 17% | 1% | - | - | - | |
25 | DAWES Isabel | 8% | 38% | 42% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.