Indianapolis Fencing Club - Indianapolis, IN, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | RIPLEY Ian | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 15% | |
2 | BOLARIN Oluwatosin N. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 47% |
3 | PAMERLEAU Ian | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 18% | 3% | |
3 | TARR Robert | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 40% | 8% | |
5 | KRAJ Pawel | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 42% | 10% | |
6 | SON Eric | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 16% | |
7 | GUILFORD Corey | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 41% | 9% | |
8 | SOARE Maria Elena | 100% | 93% | 69% | 35% | 10% | 1% | - |
9 | THOMAS Samuel | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 19% | |
10 | KRAVITZ Sarah | 100% | 94% | 71% | 37% | 12% | 2% | - |
11 | STENNIS Brendan | 100% | 99% | 86% | 50% | 16% | 2% | |
12 | BRENNEMAN Adam | 100% | 100% | 92% | 63% | 25% | 5% | - |
13 | REED Dusty (Allen) | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 44% | 11% | |
14 | LAUER Michael | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 55% | 16% | |
15 | SORG Jacqueline C. | 100% | 94% | 67% | 29% | 6% | 1% | |
16 | MILLER Brent | 100% | 100% | 94% | 73% | 38% | 10% | 1% |
17 | WANG Peter | 100% | 99% | 90% | 58% | 20% | 3% | |
18 | LAI Yat Hay Casper | 100% | 98% | 76% | 36% | 9% | 1% | |
19 | FANG Samuel | 100% | 100% | 90% | 45% | 11% | 1% | |
20 | DVORAK Ryan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 28% | 5% |
21 | YANG Seung Joo | 100% | 40% | 7% | 1% | - | - | |
22 | MILLER Hayden | 100% | 97% | 71% | 29% | 5% | - | |
23 | BESEL Natalie | 100% | 41% | 6% | - | - | - | |
24 | SWEETS Aidan | 100% | 19% | 1% | - | - | - | |
25 | DAWES Isabel | 100% | 92% | 54% | 12% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.