Indianapolis Fencing Club - Indianapolis, IN, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
1 | PAI Lakshan K. | - | 2% | 13% | 41% | 45% | |
2 | PALMA Matthew Dominic | - | - | 2% | 13% | 41% | 44% |
3 | WANG Eric J. | - | - | 3% | 16% | 42% | 40% |
3 | VAN BUREN Brett J. | - | - | 2% | 16% | 42% | 40% |
5 | FORTUNE Alexander J. | - | - | 1% | 6% | 34% | 59% |
6 | NYKAMP Caleb | - | 3% | 22% | 46% | 26% | 3% |
7 | CLAYPOOL Conner | - | 1% | 11% | 36% | 42% | 10% |
8 | SANTOS Carlos R. | - | 1% | 16% | 41% | 34% | 8% |
9 | PINKERTON Joseph H. | - | 1% | 8% | 36% | 45% | 10% |
10 | ROBINSON-LEVANT Bryson | - | 2% | 23% | 44% | 27% | 4% |
11 | SORRENTINO Salvatore | 7% | 30% | 40% | 20% | 3% | |
12 | SON Eric | - | 1% | 14% | 47% | 33% | 5% |
13 | BOYKO Miles | - | 7% | 34% | 42% | 16% | 1% |
14 | LIM Lance Jeremiah | 7% | 29% | 40% | 20% | 4% | |
15 | MARCUS Peter | 1% | 10% | 34% | 38% | 16% | 2% |
16 | WANG Jim | 1% | 11% | 38% | 39% | 11% | 1% |
17 | DENMAN Matthew L. | - | 1% | 12% | 37% | 39% | 11% |
18 | DUNLAP Ian | 17% | 46% | 30% | 6% | - | - |
19 | SOARE Maria Elena | 39% | 49% | 12% | - | - | - |
20 | DVORAK Ryan | 22% | 49% | 24% | 5% | - | - |
21 | NIMMO Joshua | 6% | 28% | 42% | 22% | 2% | |
22 | KOZINSKI Allison E. | 4% | 23% | 38% | 27% | 7% | 1% |
23 | BERNWANGER Phillip | 33% | 52% | 14% | 1% | - | - |
24 | BAILEY Lauren | 4% | 29% | 48% | 17% | 2% | - |
25 | LEE Claire L. | 23% | 43% | 27% | 7% | - | |
26 | FENG Lauren | 39% | 46% | 14% | 1% | - | - |
27 | MALVESTUTO Evelyn | 26% | 42% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - |
28 | HAAS Zane | 12% | 53% | 30% | 5% | - | - |
29 | LEVANT Briea | 45% | 44% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.