Austin Challenge SYC and RCC

Youth 12 Men’s Saber (Y12MS)

Friday, December 19, 2025 at 8:00 AM

Register

Round Rock Sports Center - Round Rock, TX

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 1840 1984 - 1740
5 - 8 1684 1739 - 1639
9 - 16 1317 1695 - 974
17 - 29 1200 2500 - 639

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 CAO, HAOTIAN Alpha Fencing Academy U 1984 1692.41
2 Wang, David Avant Garde Fencers Club, Inc (CA) (AGFC) U 1789 1516.84
3 Kuang, Cyrus Globus Fencing Academy U 1845 1499.12
4 Duff, Michael Globus Fencing Academy U 1740 1475.20
5 Favo, Christopher Alpha Fencing Academy U 1739 1424.65
6 Lu, Simon Lone Star Fencing Center U 1693 1402.42
7 Zhang, Caleb Globus Fencing Academy U 1667 1379.84
8 Su, Eric Spartak U 1639 1360.82
9 Qi, Zach West Coast Fencing Academy U 1537 1263.76
10 DeGuzman, Miguel Javier U 1695 1163.14
11 Oh, Caleb Globus Fencing Academy U 1498 1121.84
12 Zhang, Hanzhi The Fencing Center U 1215 879.51
13 Chen, Harrison Globus Fencing Academy U 1351 838.75
14 Lei, Isaac LA Fencing Academy of Pomona U 974 617.60
15 Wu, Allen South Bay Fencing Academy U 1046 525.54
16 Yuen, Travis Globus Fencing Academy U 1219 485.51
17 Xie, Andy Sigma Fencing Academy U 1208 301.07
18 Jain, Aarambh Sabio Fencing Academy U 1012 288.35
19 Lin, Rongcheng Noah Bay Area Fencing Club U 845 238.99
20 Chidambaram, Nivedh Sabio Fencing Academy U 725 196.17
21 Poles, Lucas Texas Fencing Academy U 1687 61.89
22 Hadfield, Gavin Oregon Fencing Alliance U 801 43.36
23 Qiu, Lucas Globus Fencing Academy U 780 35.99
24 Vadlamani, Anirudh Dhir Sabio Fencing Academy U 2500 < 0
25 Meagher, Fionn U 2500 < 0
26 Sampat, Arjun Globus Fencing Academy U 879 < 0
27 Shi, Mark West Coast Fencing Academy (Austin) U 1064 < 0
28 Khan, Zorayz Globus Fencing Academy U 959 < 0
29 Gupta, Abir Globus Fencing Academy U 639 < 0

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!