SportsPlex At Metuchen - Metuchen, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LEE Sophia | - | - | - | 3% | 16% | 41% | 40% |
| 2 | KANDADAI Lara | - | 2% | 16% | 39% | 33% | 9% | |
| 3 | ZENG Sarah | - | 2% | 10% | 24% | 33% | 23% | 7% |
| 3 | ZHANG Chenfei | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 32% | 12% | |
| 5 | REN Xinling | - | - | 5% | 20% | 37% | 30% | 7% |
| 6 | LEUNG Ashlyn K. | 3% | 16% | 33% | 31% | 14% | 3% | |
| 7 | MANKOVA Varvara | 2% | 11% | 26% | 31% | 21% | 7% | 1% |
| 8 | SCHAIBLE Sofia L. | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 34% | 27% | 8% |
| 9 | WANG yining | - | - | 3% | 13% | 31% | 36% | 17% |
| 10 | FAVO Isabella | - | - | 4% | 22% | 44% | 29% | |
| 11 | BARROSO Isabela | 12% | 32% | 34% | 17% | 5% | 1% | < 1% |
| 12 | YOUNG Charlotte G. | - | 1% | 6% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 8% |
| 13 | CRAINE Alexandra E. | 1% | 7% | 21% | 31% | 26% | 12% | 2% |
| 14 | MCSWEENEY Kylie | 1% | 8% | 23% | 33% | 25% | 9% | 1% |
| 15 | GUGALA Hanna | - | 2% | 18% | 40% | 32% | 8% | |
| 16 | BUSH Bethany | - | 3% | 13% | 29% | 33% | 19% | 4% |
| 17 | BERNSTEIN Aiden S. | - | 2% | 11% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 5% |
| 18 | MYAT Chloe | 4% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 12% | 2% | |
| 19 | YEN Natalie | - | 4% | 26% | 42% | 24% | 5% | |
| 20 | FREEMAN Armine | - | 6% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 7% | 1% |
| 21 | TREACY Aisling | - | 5% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 11% | 2% |
| 22 | MARGULIAN Maria | 1% | 8% | 21% | 31% | 26% | 11% | 2% |
| 23 | NAYAK Esha | 1% | 6% | 22% | 35% | 28% | 8% | |
| 24 | KNOBEL Sophia | 1% | 8% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
| 25 | MERCHANT Aishwarya | - | 3% | 17% | 35% | 31% | 12% | 1% |
| 26 | NAYAK Anika | - | 7% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 6% | 1% |
| 27 | HU Anna | 2% | 17% | 34% | 30% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 28 | DAVIS Jordan | - | 5% | 21% | 34% | 28% | 11% | 2% |
| 29 | ONG Lauren | 16% | 59% | 22% | 3% | - | - | |
| 30 | FLATT Sophia | - | 4% | 16% | 31% | 31% | 15% | 3% |
| 31 | CHOU Amy R. | 2% | 13% | 27% | 31% | 19% | 6% | 1% |
| 32 | WOTZAK Kaia | 5% | 31% | 39% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 33 | AKULA Roszlynn | 20% | 39% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 34 | BIRNSTILL Reese | 6% | 22% | 33% | 25% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 35 | NEUMAN Ella | 9% | 29% | 35% | 21% | 6% | 1% | |
| 36 | CHOU Zoe | 1% | 9% | 23% | 32% | 24% | 10% | 2% |
| 37 | CHAMPAGNE Valentine | 70% | 28% | 2% | - | - | - | |
| 38 | JUDICKE Sophia | 7% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 7% | 1% | |
| 39 | MORGAN Lily | 65% | 30% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
| 40 | NAYAK Antara | 58% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.