Austin Challenge SYC and RCC

Youth 10 Men’s Saber (Y10MS)

Saturday, December 20, 2025 at 3:30 PM

Register

Round Rock Sports Center - Round Rock, TX

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 1723 1871 - 1550
5 - 8 1554 1712 - 1460
9 - 16 1403 1704 - 1197
17 - 26 949 1428 - 639

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 Ye, Aaron LA Fencing Academy of Pomona U 1871 1574.19
2 Ghim, Ethan Charlotte Sabers Fencing Academy U 1859 1500.56
3 Kwon, Joon Nazlymov Fencing Foundation U 1613 1274.33
4 Constantine, Leonidas Tim Morehouse Fencing Club U 1550 1198.42
5 Zhang, Ethan Tim Morehouse Fencing Club (Port Chester) U 1535 1141.66
6 Horikawa, Xander West Coast Fencing Academy U 1712 1067.63
7 Qiao, Jason LA Fencing Academy of Pomona U 1460 1066.84
8 Jiao, Lawrence LA Fencing Academy of Pomona U 1511 1040.48
9 Guo, Aiden Globus Fencing Academy U 1322 934.43
10 Wang, Thomas Charlotte Sabers Fencing Academy U 1309 798.39
11 Liang, Henry Nellya Fencers U 1342 787.40
12 Jiang, Hardy Southern California Fencing Academy (SOCALFA) U 1704 663.50
13 Nakamura, Haruki Globus Fencing Academy U 1493 645.57
14 Lakkaraju, Prathik Globus Fencing Academy U 1560 529.50
15 Tam, Ethan West Coast Fencing Academy U 1197 519.70
16 Cheng, Daniel West Coast Fencing Academy U 1298 462.33
17 Xie, Andy Sigma Fencing Academy U 1190 405.17
18 Lakkaraju, Dhishan Globus Fencing Academy U 1428 279.70
19 Lin, Rongcheng Noah Bay Area Fencing Club U 832 276.62
20 Chang, Allen Eagle Blade Fencers Club U 864 269.18
21 Qiu, Lucas Globus Fencing Academy U 713 9.75
22 Jiang, Harry Southern California Fencing Academy (SOCALFA) U 1155 < 0
23 Khan, Zorayz Globus Fencing Academy U 959 < 0
24 Anup, Abhay Sabio Fencing Academy U 886 < 0
25 Shen, Aaron Lone Star Fencing Center U 826 < 0
26 Gupta, Abir Globus Fencing Academy U 639 < 0

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!