Austin Challenge SYC and RCC

Youth 10 Men’s Saber (Y10MS)

Saturday, December 20, 2025 at 3:30 PM

Register

Round Rock Sports Center - Round Rock, TX

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 1708 1871 - 1545
5 - 8 1555 1712 - 1458
9 - 16 1403 1704 - 1190
17 - 24 936 1428 - 639

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 Ye, Aaron LA Fencing Academy of Pomona U 1871 1574.19
2 Ghim, Ethan Charlotte Sabers Fencing Academy U 1857 1489.16
3 Kwon, Joon Nazlymov Fencing Foundation U 1560 1192.65
4 Constantine, Leonidas Tim Morehouse Fencing Club U 1545 1184.30
5 Zhang, Ethan Tim Morehouse Fencing Club (Port Chester) U 1532 1129.35
6 Horikawa, Xander West Coast Fencing Academy U 1712 1067.63
7 Qiao, Jason LA Fencing Academy of Pomona U 1458 1054.83
8 Jiao, Lawrence LA Fencing Academy of Pomona U 1517 1029.85
9 Guo, Aiden Globus Fencing Academy U 1327 937.79
10 Wang, Thomas Charlotte Sabers Fencing Academy U 1285 760.06
11 Liang, Henry Nellya Fencers U 1347 759.42
12 Jiang, Hardy Southern California Fencing Academy (SOCALFA) U 1704 663.50
13 Nakamura, Haruki Globus Fencing Academy U 1493 645.57
14 Lakkaraju, Prathik Globus Fencing Academy U 1560 529.50
15 Cheng, Daniel West Coast Fencing Academy U 1317 471.05
16 Xie, Andy Sigma Fencing Academy U 1190 405.17
17 Lakkaraju, Dhishan Globus Fencing Academy U 1428 279.70
18 Chang, Allen Eagle Blade Fencers Club U 864 269.18
19 Lin, Rongcheng Noah Bay Area Fencing Club U 781 195.16
20 Qiu, Lucas Globus Fencing Academy U 780 35.99
21 Jiang, Harry Southern California Fencing Academy (SOCALFA) U 1155 < 0
22 Khan, Zorayz Globus Fencing Academy U 959 < 0
23 Anup, Abhay Sabio Fencing Academy U 886 < 0
24 Gupta, Abir Globus Fencing Academy U 639 < 0

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!