Austin Challenge SYC and RCC

Youth 10 Men’s Saber (Y10MS)

Saturday, December 20, 2025 at 3:30 PM

Register

Round Rock Sports Center - Round Rock, TX

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 1814 1916 - 1670
5 - 8 1538 1593 - 1474
9 - 16 1376 1688 - 1231
17 - 24 865 1341 - 601

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 Ye, Aaron LA Fencing Academy of Pomona U 1916 1638.20
2 Ghim, Ethan Charlotte Sabers Fencing Academy U 1835 1521.48
3 Horikawa, Xander West Coast Fencing Academy U 1834 1386.75
4 Constantine, Leonidas Tim Morehouse Fencing Club U 1670 1367.74
5 Kwon, Joon Nazlymov Fencing Foundation U 1593 1281.74
6 Zhang, Ethan Tim Morehouse Fencing Club (Port Chester) U 1535 1174.22
7 Jiao, Lawrence LA Fencing Academy of Pomona U 1548 1146.94
8 Wang, Thomas Charlotte Sabers Fencing Academy U 1474 1093.86
9 Qiao, Jason LA Fencing Academy of Pomona U 1401 1073.89
10 Guo, Aiden Globus Fencing Academy U 1358 1005.31
11 Lakkaraju, Prathik Globus Fencing Academy U 1688 852.34
12 Jiang, Hardy Southern California Fencing Academy (SOCALFA) U 1415 770.74
13 Tam, Ethan West Coast Fencing Academy U 1261 737.80
14 Liang, Henry Nellya Fencers U 1231 718.83
15 Xie, Andy Sigma Fencing Academy U 1297 637.05
16 Nakamura, Haruki Globus Fencing Academy U 1356 586.11
17 Lin, Rongcheng Noah Bay Area Fencing Club U 863 368.08
18 Lakkaraju, Dhishan Globus Fencing Academy U 1341 270.56
19 Qiu, Lucas Globus Fencing Academy U 805 141.58
20 Khan, Zorayz Globus Fencing Academy U 1001 112.01
21 Jiang, Harry Southern California Fencing Academy (SOCALFA) U 952 17.33
22 Gupta, Abir Globus Fencing Academy U 664 < 0
23 Anup, Abhay Sabio Fencing Academy U 691 < 0
24 Shen, Aaron Lone Star Fencing Center U 601 < 0

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!