Parsippany, NJ - Parsippany, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
2 | KASI Sanjay | - | - | 4% | 20% | 44% | 31% | |
3 | JOSEPH Dominic | - | 4% | 18% | 33% | 29% | 13% | 2% |
3 | LIN Richard W. | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 42% | 22% | |
5 | DENYSE Jameson | - | - | 3% | 16% | 33% | 34% | 13% |
6 | HO Ryan J. | - | 6% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
7 | BALL James T. | 2% | 11% | 28% | 35% | 20% | 5% | |
8 | IVARSSON Oliver | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 39% | 15% | |
10 | MCCLAIN Bryce C. | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 32% | 10% | |
11 | HEWES Thomas G. | - | 1% | 9% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 5% |
12 | CORTIZAS John (Jack) | 2% | 15% | 33% | 32% | 15% | 3% | - |
13 | BAE Kevin | 1% | 9% | 27% | 36% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
14 | GOGUEN-COMPAGNONI Nicholas | - | - | 1% | 10% | 30% | 40% | 19% |
15 | RINEHART Conner M. | 3% | 16% | 35% | 33% | 12% | 1% | |
16 | TSAI Philip W. | 2% | 13% | 32% | 35% | 16% | 2% | |
17 | MA Alexander | - | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 41% | 21% |
18 | ZHANG Henry C. | - | 3% | 14% | 30% | 32% | 17% | 3% |
19 | TIAN Yuzhe (Charlie) | - | 2% | 11% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 5% |
20 | DESOLA Damian C. | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 4% |
21 | WANG Michael | - | 5% | 26% | 40% | 23% | 4% | |
22 | MATHEWS Rocco J. | 14% | 39% | 35% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
23 | HERGERT Benito | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 15% | 2% |
24 | FRITZ Ayden R. | - | 1% | 8% | 22% | 34% | 27% | 8% |
25 | XIE Javah | 2% | 12% | 29% | 33% | 18% | 5% | 1% |
26 | BROOKES Scott L. | - | 3% | 15% | 31% | 32% | 16% | 3% |
27 | ISRAELIAN Marat | - | 3% | 21% | 41% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
28 | FERRARO Peter M. | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 35% | 31% | 10% |
29 | HU Robin | 1% | 9% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 4% | |
30 | WEINKOPF William O. | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 35% | 15% | |
31 | LEE Daniel C. | - | - | 3% | 18% | 43% | 36% | |
32 | MCGRATH Sean L. | 9% | 28% | 34% | 21% | 7% | 1% | - |
33 | KITAGAWA Eric S. | 8% | 33% | 37% | 18% | 4% | - | |
34 | YEROKHIN Michael N. | - | - | 6% | 26% | 43% | 21% | 3% |
35 | HEALY Griffen | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 7% |
36 | MACRAE Harrison A. | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 37% | 28% | 6% |
37 | ONIK Elijah T. | 1% | 7% | 24% | 35% | 24% | 8% | 1% |
38 | CAI Oliver K. | 1% | 6% | 23% | 38% | 27% | 6% | |
39 | LE Vyn A. | 1% | 12% | 32% | 35% | 17% | 3% | |
40 | REZNICK Nicholas J. | - | 2% | 13% | 32% | 37% | 16% | |
41 | MILLER Trent D. | 1% | 10% | 31% | 37% | 18% | 3% | |
42 | ENGEL Henry R. | 7% | 34% | 38% | 18% | 4% | - | |
43 | MONTALVO-ZOTTER Gabriel M. | - | 6% | 28% | 41% | 22% | 4% | |
44 | KWON Ethan | - | 3% | 13% | 29% | 33% | 18% | 4% |
45 | SCHICKER Glenn | - | 1% | 9% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 6% |
46 | KAZA Nitish | - | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 38% | 18% |
47 | SWADDIPONG Diego P. | 2% | 11% | 27% | 32% | 20% | 7% | 1% |
48 | COSTELLO Chaissen F. | 1% | 6% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
49 | ORR Aidan | - | 2% | 15% | 35% | 33% | 14% | 2% |
50 | FURST Matthew C. | 4% | 21% | 39% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - |
51 | MAGIDSON Gabriel | 11% | 35% | 37% | 15% | 2% | - | |
52 | DAUM Charlie | 6% | 23% | 35% | 25% | 9% | 1% | |
53 | ST. CLAIR Regan A. | 2% | 13% | 31% | 33% | 17% | 3% | |
54 | WANG Gerald Y. | 13% | 36% | 34% | 14% | 2% | - | |
55 | NAGER Noah | - | - | 2% | 9% | 28% | 40% | 22% |
56 | ALDRICH Peter | - | 3% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 2% |
57 | BOOTSMA Shawn-Ryan V. | 4% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 12% | 2% | - |
58 | MUNDAHL Brandon D. | 12% | 33% | 34% | 16% | 4% | - | |
59 | HAN Lawrence | 1% | 11% | 32% | 36% | 17% | 3% | - |
60 | TSAI Max W. | 1% | 9% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
61 | BELLUOMO David C. | 6% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
62 | TAKLE Douglas | 26% | 41% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
63 | DYCKMAN Andrew P. | 26% | 42% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
64 | BAO Wenyuan | 32% | 45% | 20% | 3% | - | - | |
65 | MUNDAHL Morgan K. | 2% | 14% | 33% | 33% | 15% | 3% | |
66 | BOUSSY Luciano | 2% | 14% | 34% | 34% | 14% | 2% | |
67 | BOOTSMA Shane-Anson | 5% | 23% | 39% | 26% | 7% | 1% | |
68 | DESOLA Aidan J. | 4% | 20% | 34% | 27% | 11% | 2% | - |
69 | STURGIS Zachary C. | 9% | 32% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
70 | SHEIKH Arham | 50% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
71 | ESTEVES Dionel L. | 14% | 36% | 34% | 14% | 3% | - | |
72 | WOHLERS Casey | 10% | 29% | 34% | 20% | 6% | 1% | - |
73 | HILMER Michael | 17% | 37% | 31% | 12% | 3% | - | - |
74 | WADE Grayson | 8% | 27% | 34% | 22% | 7% | 1% | - |
75 | QUINTEROS AMAT Tomas | 20% | 42% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - | |
76 | MONTALBINE Aidan | 45% | 41% | 12% | 2% | - | - | - |
77 | SHADPOOR Ryan | 21% | 44% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
78 | ZHAO Jesse | 5% | 25% | 39% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
79 | DEGEORGES Kip L. | 25% | 46% | 24% | 4% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.