Miami University Phillips Hall - oxford, OH, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1 | LI Wangjie | - | - | - | 1% | 20% | 79% |
| 2 | ZHAO Sophie | - | - | 4% | 28% | 68% | |
| 3 | CULLIVAN Justice | - | - | - | - | 7% | 93% |
| 3 | PALMA Matthew Dominic | - | 3% | 17% | 40% | 32% | 7% |
| 5 | CHAN Matthew | - | - | 2% | 25% | 62% | 10% |
| 6 | SANTOS Carlos | - | 4% | 23% | 45% | 27% | 1% |
| 7 | DIEPSTRA Jeremy | 3% | 28% | 51% | 16% | 1% | - |
| 8 | BLAKEMAN Michael J. | - | 16% | 43% | 35% | 6% | |
| 9 | CHEREDNICHENKO Ihor | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 42% | 27% |
| 10 | BASSIK Eva | - | 20% | 49% | 29% | 2% | |
| 11 | GNEUHS Sam | 2% | 20% | 43% | 28% | 6% | - |
| 12 | BIESIADA Jan | 12% | 35% | 35% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 14 | KEMNITZER John | 8% | 28% | 36% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
| 15 | ALLEN Henry | - | 3% | 23% | 56% | 18% | 1% |
| 16 | DENMAN Matthew L L. | 1% | 8% | 26% | 38% | 22% | 4% |
| 17 | ZHAO Zhiyong | - | 4% | 22% | 46% | 27% | 1% |
| 18 | JAMES John | 59% | 34% | 6% | - | - | - |
| 19 | LEE Chan | 4% | 35% | 43% | 17% | 1% | |
| 20 | KIM John | 21% | 50% | 26% | 3% | - | - |
| 21 | RYAN Ben | 10% | 43% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 22 | HAAS Zane | 84% | 16% | 1% | - | - | |
| 23 | DENIHAN John | 51% | 41% | 7% | - | - | - |
| 24 | BLACKLEDGE Michael | 13% | 39% | 35% | 12% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.