Madison, NJ - Madison, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | PAK Kaitlyn | - | - | - | 5% | 33% | 61% | |
2 | BLUM Leah I. | - | - | 1% | 9% | 43% | 48% | |
3 | WEBER Juliana I. | - | 3% | 13% | 29% | 33% | 19% | 4% |
3 | LI Amanda C. | - | - | 3% | 19% | 52% | 26% | |
5 | KATZ Anat | - | - | - | 4% | 20% | 42% | 33% |
6 | STONE Hava S. | - | - | 6% | 29% | 50% | 15% | |
7 | GORMLEY Arwen E. | 1% | 6% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
8 | SCALAMONI-GOLDSTEIN Charlotte S. | - | - | 2% | 14% | 33% | 36% | 14% |
9 | SHOMAN Miriam | - | - | 3% | 14% | 35% | 36% | 12% |
10 | NI Sharon | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 36% | 19% | 3% |
11 | RIZKALA Joanna | - | 1% | 8% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 7% |
12 | CANNON Sophia E. | - | 1% | 11% | 35% | 42% | 10% | |
13 | HILD Nisha | - | 6% | 28% | 45% | 18% | 2% | |
14 | SHOMAN Jenna | - | - | - | 7% | 36% | 57% | |
15 | SHIH Christina | 2% | 15% | 36% | 32% | 13% | 2% | - |
16 | DOVE Tyanna | - | 5% | 21% | 34% | 28% | 11% | 2% |
17 | LUKASHENKO Angelina | - | 2% | 12% | 28% | 33% | 20% | 5% |
18 | WANG Jianning | 6% | 28% | 41% | 22% | 3% | - | |
19 | LEE Sophia | 3% | 19% | 39% | 30% | 8% | - | |
20 | CHIANG Emily | 2% | 17% | 39% | 32% | 9% | 1% | |
21 | DANK Dina | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 35% | 17% | 3% |
22 | LEVITIS Danielle | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 5% |
23 | SLOBODSKY Sasha L. | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 33% | 13% | 2% |
24 | BAKER Audrey C. | 1% | 8% | 23% | 33% | 24% | 9% | 1% |
25 | SHEN Jamie | 29% | 48% | 20% | 3% | - | - | |
26 | GUZMAN Claudia | 4% | 24% | 46% | 23% | 4% | - | |
27 | BROWN Delaney | - | 5% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 9% | 1% |
28 | YEPEZ Olivia R. | 33% | 43% | 20% | 4% | - | - | - |
29 | MEDVEDEVA Alexandra | 21% | 44% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
30 | O'HARA Eimile J. | 5% | 27% | 42% | 22% | 4% | - | |
31 | COLTER Aurora | 22% | 46% | 27% | 5% | - | - | |
32 | LEUNG Ashlyn K. | 7% | 33% | 39% | 17% | 3% | - | |
33 | WALSHE Kira | 11% | 34% | 37% | 16% | 2% | - | |
34 | NAYAK Anika | 15% | 41% | 32% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
35 | REN Xinling | 34% | 41% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
36 | KRYLOVA Valery | 3% | 17% | 32% | 30% | 14% | 3% | - |
37 | CHU Laura | 29% | 46% | 21% | 3% | - | - | |
38 | HAQ Nylah | 46% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - | - | |
39 | YI Felicia | 28% | 44% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.